Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1969–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bryant v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Bryant v. State, 794 N.E.2d 1135, 1142-43 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003), trans. denied; Ind. Evidence Rule 804(b)(3). | 1 | 1 |
Popovich v. Indiana Department of State Revenuegreen1 sentence2016See Popovich I, 7 N.E.3d at 418-19 , Thus, even if practitioners commonly respond to discovery requests by raising blanket objections, that common practice cannot satisfy the substantial justification requirement of Indiana Trial. | 1 | 1 |
Nill v. Martingreen2 sentences2002Cf. Martin, 686 N.E.2d at 118-19 (Boehm, J., dissenting) (arguing that the rationale for the rule requiring court pre-approval of child support modifications "disappears where both parents agree," and advocating for an exception to the rule where the custodial and non-custodial parents agree to a reduction in support after the death or emancipation of a child). 2002Cf Martin, 686 N.E.2d at 118-19 (Boehm, J., dissenting) (arguing that the rationale for the rule requiring court pre-approval of child support modifications "disappears where both parents agree," and advocating for an exception to the rule where the custodial and non-custodial parents agree to a reduction in support after the death or emancipation of a child). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Estate of Garwood
green
2 sentences2020The justification for this rule was stated by the Indiana Supreme Court in Matter of Garwood’s Estate, 272 Ind. 519 , 400 N.E.2d 758 , (1980): “It matters not that there was no fraud contemplated and no injury done. 2020The justification for this rule was stated by the Indiana Supreme Court in Matter of Garwood’s Estate, 272 Ind. 519 , 400 N.E.2d 758 , (1980): “It matters not that there was no fraud contemplated and no injury done. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Blatchford v. State
green
1 sentence2012“As a result, the burden of proving the defense remains on the defendant.” Blatchford, 673 N.E.2d at 783 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
McCormick v. State
green
2 sentences2005McCormick, 803 N.E.2d at 1110 . 2005McCormick, 803 N.E.2d at 1110 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opper v. United States
green
2 sentences1969The justification for such a rule was well expressed in Opper v. United States, note 4, supra, where it was said: ‘In our country the doubt persists that the zeal of the agencies of prosecution to protect the peace, the self-interest of the accomplice, the maliciousness of an enemy or the aberration or weakness of the accused under the strain of suspicion may tinge or warp the facts of the confession.’ 348 U. S. 84, 89-90 , 75 S. Ct. 158, 162 . 1969The justification for such a rule was well expressed in Opper v. United States, note 4, supra, where it was said: ‘In our country the doubt persists that the zeal of the agencies of prosecution to protect the peace, the self-interest of the accomplice, the maliciousness of an enemy or the aberration or weakness of the accused under the strain of suspicion may tinge or warp the facts of the confession.’ 348 U. S. 84, 89-90 , 75 S. Ct. 158, 162 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.