Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 MP opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by MP courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chester Oglesby v. Southern Pacific Transportation Companygreen2 sentences1994Because Nansay alleges that the court failed to give certain instructions, we review all the instructions given as a whole under an abuse of discretion standard “to determine if they are misleading or inadequate.” Id. (citing Oviatt v. Pearce, 954 F.2d 1470 , 1481 (9th Cir. 1992)). 2 No error injury instructions will require a reversal of the judgment on a jury verdict where the verdict “is more probably than not untainted by the error.” Glover v. BIC Corp., 6 F.3d 1318, 1327 (9th Cir. 1993); see also Oglesby, 6 F.3d at 606 (applying harmless error doctrine) (citing Caballero v. City of Concor 1994Because Nansay alleges that the court failed to give certain instructions, we review all the instructions given as a whole under an abuse of discretion standard “to determine if they are misleading or inadequate.” Id. (citing Oviatt v. Pearce, 954 F.2d 1470 , 1481 (9th Cir. 1992)). 2 No error injury instructions will require a reversal of the judgment on a jury verdict where the verdict “is more probably than not untainted by the error.” Glover v. BIC Corp., 6 F.3d 1318, 1327 (9th Cir. 1993); see also Oglesby, 6 F.3d at 606 (applying harmless error doctrine) (citing Caballero v. City of Concor | 1 | 1 |
cluster 654627green1 sentence1994Because Nansay alleges that the court failed to give certain instructions, we review all the instructions given as a whole under an abuse of discretion standard “to determine if they are misleading or inadequate.” Id. (citing Oviatt v. Pearce, 954 F.2d 1470 , 1481 (9th Cir. 1992)). 2 No error injury instructions will require a reversal of the judgment on a jury verdict where the verdict “is more probably than not untainted by the error.” Glover v. BIC Corp., 6 F.3d 1318, 1327 (9th Cir. 1993); see also Oglesby, 6 F.3d at 606 (applying harmless error doctrine) (citing Caballero v. City of Concor | 1 | 1 |
United States v. James G. Blackwoodgreen1 sentence1994Cf. United States v. Blackwood, 878 F.2d 1200, 1202 (9th Cir. 1989) (lower court’s decision regarding sufficiency of the authentication of admitted handwriting reviewed for abuse of discretion). | 1 | 1 |
Philip Caballero v. City of Concord Concord Police Dept. R. Perryman R. MacCarogreen1 sentence1994Because Nansay alleges that the court failed to give certain instructions, we review all the instructions given as a whole under an abuse of discretion standard “to determine if they are misleading or inadequate.” Id. (citing Oviatt v. Pearce, 954 F.2d 1470 , 1481 (9th Cir. 1992)). 2 No error injury instructions will require a reversal of the judgment on a jury verdict where the verdict “is more probably than not untainted by the error.” Glover v. BIC Corp., 6 F.3d 1318, 1327 (9th Cir. 1993); see also Oglesby, 6 F.3d at 606 (applying harmless error doctrine) (citing Caballero v. City of Concor | 1 | 1 |
Julsen v. Julsengreen1 sentence1990Accord, Julsen v. Julsen, 741 P.2d 642 (Alas. 1987); Sholby v. Sherrill, 632 P.2d 270 (Ariz. 1981); Gilbert v. Warren, 594 P.2d 696 (Nev. 1979); Slade v, Dennis, 594 P.2d 898 (Ut, 1979); and Yee v. Yee, 404 P.2d-370 (Haw. 1965). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in MP. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. David Williams
green
1 sentence2025Williams, 68 F.4th at 571 . ¶ 70 In re San Nicolas allows for the disqualification of the entire OAG office “under narrow circumstances” when the OAG has had notice and a hearing. 2013 MP 8 ¶¶ 20–21. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
cluster 576712
green
1 sentence1994Because Nansay alleges that the court failed to give certain instructions, we review all the instructions given as a whole under an abuse of discretion standard “to determine if they are misleading or inadequate.” Id. (citing Oviatt v. Pearce, 954 F.2d 1470 , 1481 (9th Cir. 1992)). 2 No error injury instructions will require a reversal of the judgment on a jury verdict where the verdict “is more probably than not untainted by the error.” Glover v. BIC Corp., 6 F.3d 1318, 1327 (9th Cir. 1993); see also Oglesby, 6 F.3d at 606 (applying harmless error doctrine) (citing Caballero v. City of Concor | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Sinclair v. Sinclair
green
1 sentence1992Sinclair v. Sinclair, 718 P.2d 396 (Utah 1986). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
green
1 sentence1992Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Selas Corp. of America, 902 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1990); United States v. Hamilton, 792 F.2d 337 (9th Cir. 1986). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Booker v. Midpac Lumber Co., Ltd.
green
1 sentence1992Booker v. Midpac Lumber Co., Ltd., 649 P.2d 376 (Haw. 1982). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Gilbert v. Warren
green
1 sentence1990Accord, Julsen v. Julsen, 741 P.2d 642 (Alas. 1987); Sholby v. Sherrill, 632 P.2d 270 (Ariz. 1981); Gilbert v. Warren, 594 P.2d 696 (Nev. 1979); Slade v, Dennis, 594 P.2d 898 (Ut, 1979); and Yee v. Yee, 404 P.2d-370 (Haw. 1965). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Slade v. Dennis
green
1 sentence1990Accord, Julsen v. Julsen, 741 P.2d 642 (Alas. 1987); Sholby v. Sherrill, 632 P.2d 270 (Ariz. 1981); Gilbert v. Warren, 594 P.2d 696 (Nev. 1979); Slade v, Dennis, 594 P.2d 898 (Ut, 1979); and Yee v. Yee, 404 P.2d-370 (Haw. 1965). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.