6 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cream Top Creamery v. Dean Milk Companygreen2 sentences1991And in Cream Top Creamery v. Dean Milk Company, Inc., 383 F.2d 358, 362 (6th Cir.1967), the United States Court of Appeals determined that the related doctrine of collateral estoppel, also known as the “issue preclusion” doctrine, is applicable in the following situation: [W]here the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. 1991And in Cream Top Creamery v. Dean Milk Company, Inc., 383 F.2d 358, 362 (6th Cir.1967), the United States Court of Appeals determined that the related doctrine of collateral estoppel, also known as the “issue preclusion” doctrine, is applicable in the following situation: [W]here the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. | 2 | 2 |
Lawrence v. Bingham, Greenebaum, Doll, L.L.P.green1 sentence2024See Lawrence v. Bingham, Greenebaum, Doll, L.L.P., 567 S.W.3d 133, 141 (Ky. 2018). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Carmine Tramuntigreen2 sentences1999“Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant.” United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F,2d 492, 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). 1999"Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant." United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F.2d 492 , 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ciuzio v. United States
green
2 sentences1999“Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant.” United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F,2d 492, 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). 1999"Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant." United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F.2d 492 , 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
United States v. Pasquale Cioffi and Eugene Robert Ciuzio
green
1 sentence1999"Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant." United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F.2d 492 , 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Graziani v. Committee on Legal Ethics
green
2 sentences1999“Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant.” United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F,2d 492, 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). 1999“Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant.” United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F,2d 492, 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Von Clemm v. Banuelos
green
2 sentences1999“Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant.” United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F,2d 492, 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). 1999“Since it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which the collateral estoppel defense will be available to a defendant.” United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1346 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974); United States v. Cioffi, 487 F,2d 492, 498 and n. 8 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied sub nom., Ciuzio v. United States, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2410 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
City of Louisville v. Louisville Professional Firefighters Ass'n, Local Union No. 345 Ex Rel. Gnagie
green
1 sentence1996City of Louisville, supra, 813 S.W.2d at 807 (quoting Lawlor v. National Screen Serv. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Sedley v. City of West Buechel
green
1 sentence1995However, under the analysis required by Sedley, supra, the doctrine does not apply to appellant’s claims for lost wages, pain and suffering, emotional distress and loss of enjoyment of life as they are distinct elements of damage immaterial to the determination of the criminal proceeding. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.