Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nebraska opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Graham v. Floridagreen2 sentences2017See, also, Mantich, supra note 8 . 31 Mantich, supra note 29 . 32 Mantich, supra note 8 . 33 Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 , 130 S. Ct. 2011 , 176 L. 2017See, also, Mantich, supra note 8 . 31 Mantich, supra note 29 . 32 Mantich, supra note 8 . 33 Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 , 130 S. Ct. 2011 , 176 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jackson
green
1 sentence2017Ed. 2d 825 (2010). 14 Nollen, supra note 12 , 296 Neb. at 118 , 892 N.W.2d at 97 , quoting Graham, supra note 13 . - 38 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports STATE v. JACKSON Cite as 297 Neb. 22 [5,6] We also noted that in Miller,15 the Court declined to extend a categorical bar of no life-without-parole sentences to juveniles convicted of homicide. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Nollen
green
2 sentences2017Ed. 2d 825 (2010). 14 Nollen, supra note 12 , 296 Neb. at 118 , 892 N.W.2d at 97 , quoting Graham, supra note 13 . - 38 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports STATE v. JACKSON Cite as 297 Neb. 22 [5,6] We also noted that in Miller,15 the Court declined to extend a categorical bar of no life-without-parole sentences to juveniles convicted of homicide. 2017Ed. 2d 825 (2010). 14 Nollen, supra note 12 , 296 Neb. at 118 , 892 N.W.2d at 97 , quoting Graham, supra note 13 . - 38 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports STATE v. JACKSON Cite as 297 Neb. 22 [5,6] We also noted that in Miller,15 the Court declined to extend a categorical bar of no life-without-parole sentences to juveniles convicted of homicide. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. El-Tabech
green
2 sentences2014The issue decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Graham was “whether the Constitution permits a juvenile offender to be sentenced to life in prison without parole for a nonhomicide 18 Graham, supra note 3 . 19 State v. Boppre, 280 Neb. 774 , 790 N.W.2d 417 (2010). 20 See State v. El-Tabech, 259 Neb. 509 , 610 N.W.2d 737 (2000). 2014The issue decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Graham was “whether the Constitution permits a juvenile offender to be sentenced to life in prison without parole for a nonhomicide 18 Graham, supra note 3 . 19 State v. Boppre, 280 Neb. 774 , 790 N.W.2d 417 (2010). 20 See State v. El-Tabech, 259 Neb. 509 , 610 N.W.2d 737 (2000). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Arizona v. Evans
green
2 sentences2005Thus, the Court concluded that “ [application of the Leon framework supports a categorical exception to the exclusionary rule for clerical *76 errors of court employees.” 514 U.S. at 16 . 2005However, the Court specifically declined to address the question of whether a similar analysis would be applied “in order to determine whether the evidence should be suppressed if police personnel were responsible for the error.” 514 U.S. at 16 n.5. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Neubauer v. Hostetter
green
1 sentence2004Co., supra; Neubauer, supra; Britton v. Wooten, 817 S.W.2d 443 (Ky. 1991); Page, supra; Zoppi, supra. A greater number, however, reject the aforementioned categorical rule and favor a case-by-case approach. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Britton v. Wooten
green
1 sentence2004Co., supra; Neubauer, supra; Britton v. Wooten, 817 S.W.2d 443 (Ky. 1991); Page, supra; Zoppi, supra. A greater number, however, reject the aforementioned categorical rule and favor a case-by-case approach. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Walton v. Arizona
red
2 sentences2003The Court reiterated its prior statements to the effect that a state “has considerable freedom to structure its capital sentencing system as it sees fit” and that there is no “ ‘one right way’ ” to accomplish this task. 474 U.S. at 386-87 , quoting Spaziano, supra. The U.S. Supreme Court first considered a challenge to Arizona’s capital sentencing scheme in Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S. Ct. 3047 , 111 L. 2003The Court reiterated its prior statements to the effect that a state “has considerable freedom to structure its capital sentencing system as it sees fit” and that there is no “ ‘one right way’ ” to accomplish this task. 474 U.S. at 386-87 , quoting Spaziano, supra. The U.S. Supreme Court first considered a challenge to Arizona’s capital sentencing scheme in Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S. Ct. 3047 , 111 L. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Cabana v. Bullock
green
2 sentences2003The Court concluded that the categorical rule of Enmund is a “substantive limitation on sentencing, and like other such limits it need not be enforced by the jury.” Cabana, 474 U.S. at 386 . 2003The Court reiterated its prior statements to the effect that a state “has considerable freedom to structure its capital sentencing system as it sees fit” and that there is no “ ‘one right way’ ” to accomplish this task. 474 U.S. at 386-87 , quoting Spaziano, supra. The U.S. Supreme Court first considered a challenge to Arizona’s capital sentencing scheme in Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 , 110 S. Ct. 3047 , 111 L. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.