Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pittman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Divisiongreen1 sentence2001Wyoming Workers' Compensation Diviston, 917 P.2d 614, 617 (Wyo.1996). [T18] To meet the preponderance standard, the claimant must present evidence which leads the trier of fact to find that the existence of the contested fact is more probable than its non-existence. | 1 | 1 |
Bourjaily v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1987Finally, we do not express an opinion on the proper order of proof that trial courts should follow in concluding that the preponderance standard has been satisfied in an on-going trial." Bourjaily v. United States, supra, 107 S.Ct. at 2779, n. 1 . 1987Finally, we do not express an opinion on the proper order of proof that trial courts should follow in concluding that the preponderance standard has been satisfied in an on-going trial.” Bourjaily v. United States, supra, 107 S.Ct. at 2779, n. 1 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Borchert
green
2 sentences2004Shenwin-Williams Company, 994 P.2d at 963 . 2004Sherwin-Williams Company, 994 P.2d at 963 . | 3 | 2001–2004 |
Santosky v. Kramer
green
2 sentences2002Evaluation of the three Eldridge factors compels the conclusion that use of a 'fair preponderance of the evidence' standard in such proceedings is inconsistent with due process." 455 U.S. at 758 , 102 S.Ct. at 1397 . 3 [114] Turning now to our review of the instant case, as a consequence of Father's failure to comply with W.R.A.P. 3.03, this court cannot consider the agreed statement of proceedings submitted by the parties or any facts contained therein in rendering our decision. 2002Evaluation of the three Eldridge factors compels the conclusion that use of a 'fair preponderance of the evidence' standard in such proceedings is inconsistent with due process." 455 U.S. at 758 , 102 S.Ct. at 1397 . 3 [114] Turning now to our review of the instant case, as a consequence of Father's failure to comply with W.R.A.P. 3.03, this court cannot consider the agreed statement of proceedings submitted by the parties or any facts contained therein in rendering our decision. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Lego v. Twomey
green
2 sentences1987In Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477 , 92 S.Ct. 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972), Justice White defined the test for admission of a confession as a preponderance of the evidence in considering a Jackson-Denno hearing. 1987In Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477 , 92 S.Ct. 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972), Justice White defined the test for admission of a confession as a preponderance of the evidence in considering a Jackson-Denno hearing. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.