Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Nebraska opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wormgreen2 sentences2009Simnick argues that the district court's order pursuant to § 83-174.03 that upon his release from incarceration or civil commitment he be subject to lifetime community supervision by the Office of Parole Administration is error because "such statute violates the ex post facto clause." In support of this argument, Simnick cites us to State v. Worm, 268 Neb. 74, 82 , 680 N.W.2d 151, 159 (2004), where the court held that "[a] law which purports to apply to events that occurred before the law's enactment, and which disadvantages a defendant by creating or enhancing penalties that did not exist whe 2009Simnick argues that the district court's order pursuant to § 83-174.03 that upon his release from incarceration or civil commitment he be subject to lifetime community supervision by the Office of Parole Administration is error because "such statute violates the ex post facto clause." In support of this argument, Simnick cites us to State v. Worm, 268 Neb. 74, 82 , 680 N.W.2d 151, 159 (2004), where the court held that "[a] law which purports to apply to events that occurred before the law's enactment, and which disadvantages a defendant by creating or enhancing penalties that did not exist whe | 1 | 3 |
Weaver v. Grahamgreen2 sentences1983Concerning the ex post facto claim made by Luxford, the U.S. Supreme Court in Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24 , 101 S. Ct. 960 , 67 L. 1983Concerning the ex post facto claim made by Luxford, the U.S. Supreme Court in Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24 , 101 S. Ct. 960 , 67 L. | 1 | 2 |
Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2026See, Starkey v. Oklahoma Dept. of Corrections, 305 P.3d 1004 (Okla. 2013); State v. Letalien, 985 A.2d 5 (Me. 2009); Doe v. State, 189 P.3d 999 (Alaska 2008). [27] We conclude that all the Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez factors weigh in favor of § 29-4005(1) being a civil statute. 2026See, Starkey v. Oklahoma Dept. of Corrections, 305 P.3d 1004 (Okla. 2013); State v. Letalien, 985 A.2d 5 (Me. 2009); Doe v. State, 189 P.3d 999 (Alaska 2008). [27] We conclude that all the Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez factors weigh in favor of § 29-4005(1) being a civil statute. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Davidsongreen2 sentences2026See State v. Davidson, 314 Kan. 88, 495 P.3d 9 (2021). 2026See State v. Davidson, 314 Kan. 88 , 495 P.3d 9 (2021). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Peiffergreen2 sentences1999See, State v. Peiffer, 212 Neb. 864 , 326 N.W.2d 844 (1982); State v. Crisp, 195 Neb. 833 , 241 N.W.2d 129 (1976). 1999See, State v. Peiffer, 212 Neb. 864 , 326 N.W.2d 844 (1982); State v. Crisp, 195 Neb. 833 , 241 N.W.2d 129 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
Doe v. Poritzgreen1 sentence1996See, e.g., Poritz , 662 A.2d 367 at 380-422; State v. Ward , 869 P.2d 1062 (Wash. 1994); Snyder v. State , 912 P.2d 1127 (Wyo. 1996); Artway v. Attorney General of State of New Jersey , 81 F.3d 1235 (3rd Cir. 1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Urbano
green
2 sentences2004Id. 2003Id. | 3 | 2000–2004 |
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
green
2 sentences2026Ultimately, the Supreme Court found that § 29-4004(9) was not an ex post facto violation and concluded that most of the Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 83 S. Ct. 554, 9 L. 2026Ultimately, the Supreme Court found that § 29-4004(9) was not an ex post facto violation and concluded that most of the Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 83 S. Ct. 554, 9 L. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Doe v. State
green
2 sentences2026See, Starkey v. Oklahoma Dept. of Corrections, 305 P.3d 1004 (Okla. 2013); State v. Letalien, 985 A.2d 5 (Me. 2009); Doe v. State, 189 P.3d 999 (Alaska 2008). [27] We conclude that all the Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez factors weigh in favor of § 29-4005(1) being a civil statute. 2026See, Starkey v. Oklahoma Dept. of Corrections, 305 P.3d 1004 (Okla. 2013); State v. Letalien, 985 A.2d 5 (Me. 2009); Doe v. State, 189 P.3d 999 (Alaska 2008). [27] We conclude that all the Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez factors weigh in favor of § 29-4005(1) being a civil statute. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Earhart
green
2 sentences2026EARHART Cite as 34 Neb. 2026EARHART Cite as 34 Neb. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Buggs v. Frakes
neutral
1 sentence2018Buggs v. Frakes, 298 Neb. 432 , 904 N.W.2d 664 (2017). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Interest of DV
green
2 sentences2018In re Interest of D.V., 277 Neb. 586 , 763 N.W.2d 717 (2009); In re Interest of J.R., 277 Neb. 362 , 762 N.W.2d 305 (2009). 2018In re Interest of D.V., 277 Neb. 586 , 763 N.W.2d 717 (2009); In re Interest of J.R., 277 Neb. 362 , 762 N.W.2d 305 (2009). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Interest of JR
green
2 sentences2018In re Interest of D.V., 277 Neb. 586 , 763 N.W.2d 717 (2009); In re Interest of J.R., 277 Neb. 362 , 762 N.W.2d 305 (2009). 2018In re Interest of D.V., 277 Neb. 586 , 763 N.W.2d 717 (2009); In re Interest of J.R., 277 Neb. 362 , 762 N.W.2d 305 (2009). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Castaneda
green
1 sentence2014Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. CASTANEDA 319 Cite as 287 Neb. 289 Dobbert makes it clear that the effect of Miller on Nebraska law is not a factor in the ex post facto analysis of whether a later-enacted statute increases punishment for a crime. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Payan
green
2 sentences2009However, the assignment of error now under discussion in the instant case involves the lifetime community supervision required for aggravated sexual offenses under § 83-174.03, and since the parties completed their briefing, the Nebraska Supreme Court has decided State v. Payan, 277 Neb. 663 , 765 N.W.2d 192 (2009). 2009However, the assignment of error now under discussion in the instant case involves the lifetime community supervision required for aggravated sexual offenses under § 83-174.03, and since the parties completed their briefing, the Nebraska Supreme Court has decided State v. Payan, 277 Neb. 663 , 765 N.W.2d 192 (2009). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Schreiner
green
2 sentences2009In this regard, State v. Schreiner, 276 Neb. 393 , 754 N.W.2d 742 (2008), informs our decision. 2009In this regard, State v. Schreiner, 276 Neb. 393 , 754 N.W.2d 742 (2008), informs our decision. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Moore v. Nebraska Board of Parole
green
1 sentence2008Id." 12 Neb.App at 534 , 679 N.W.2d at 435 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Smith v. Doe
green
2 sentences2004The U.S. Supreme Court recently considered an ex post facto challenge to Alaska’s sex offender registry in Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 , 123 S. Ct. 1140 , 155 L. 2004The U.S. Supreme Court recently considered an ex post facto challenge to Alaska’s sex offender registry in Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 , 123 S. Ct. 1140 , 155 L. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Grimm v. Lucera
neutral
1 sentence2003Because at the time the murder was committed the possible punishment for first degree murder was either life imprisonment or death, but the only possible punishment at the time defendant was tried was death, we determined that it was “evident that the law under which [defendant] was tried ‘inflicts a greater punishment than the law annexed to the crime when committed.’ ” Marion I, 16 Neb. at 354 , 20 N.W. at 291. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Crisp
green
2 sentences1999See, State v. Peiffer, 212 Neb. 864 , 326 N.W.2d 844 (1982); State v. Crisp, 195 Neb. 833 , 241 N.W.2d 129 (1976). 1999See, State v. Peiffer, 212 Neb. 864 , 326 N.W.2d 844 (1982); State v. Crisp, 195 Neb. 833 , 241 N.W.2d 129 (1976). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Snyder v. State
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Poritz , 662 A.2d 367 at 380-422; State v. Ward , 869 P.2d 1062 (Wash. 1994); Snyder v. State , 912 P.2d 1127 (Wyo. 1996); Artway v. Attorney General of State of New Jersey , 81 F.3d 1235 (3rd Cir. 1996). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
cluster 716733
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., Poritz , 662 A.2d 367 at 380-422; State v. Ward , 869 P.2d 1062 (Wash. 1994); Snyder v. State , 912 P.2d 1127 (Wyo. 1996); Artway v. Attorney General of State of New Jersey , 81 F.3d 1235 (3rd Cir. 1996). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Hirsch
green
1 sentence1995Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Parker
green
1 sentence1994State v. Creekpaum, 753 P.2d 1139 (Alaska 1988); Commonwealth v. Bargeron, 402 Mass. 589 , 524 N.E.2d 829 (1988); State v. Parker, 119 Or. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Creekpaum
green
1 sentence1994State v. Creekpaum, 753 P.2d 1139 (Alaska 1988); Commonwealth v. Bargeron, 402 Mass. 589 , 524 N.E.2d 829 (1988); State v. Parker, 119 Or. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Commonwealth v. Bargeron
green
2 sentences1994State v. Creekpaum, 753 P.2d 1139 (Alaska 1988); Commonwealth v. Bargeron, 402 Mass. 589 , 524 N.E.2d 829 (1988); State v. Parker, 119 Or. 1994State v. Creekpaum, 753 P.2d 1139 (Alaska 1988); Commonwealth v. Bargeron, 402 Mass. 589 , 524 N.E.2d 829 (1988); State v. Parker, 119 Or. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Kring v. Missouri
red
2 sentences1986This ruling was somewhat modified by a later decision in Kring v. Missouri, 107 U.S. 221 , 2 S. Ct. 443 , 27 L. 1986This ruling was somewhat modified by a later decision in Kring v. Missouri, 107 U.S. 221 , 2 S. Ct. 443 , 27 L. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Boston v. Black
green
1 sentence1983“The fact of the matter is that application of the law embodied in L.B. 1307 to determine offenders’ good time rights took place not at the time they were convicted of the subsequent offenses but at the time they began serving their initial sentences.” Boston v. Black, supra at 710 , 340 N.W.2d at 407-08 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.