11 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.green2 sentences2001In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 L. 2001In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 L. | 1 | 2 |
City of Chicago v. Powellgreen2 sentences2001City of Chicago v. Powell, 315 Ill. 2001City of Chicago v. Powell, 315 Ill.App.3d 1136, 1146 , 248 Ill.Dec. 799 , 735 N.E.2d 119, 127 (2000). | 1 | 2 |
City of Chicago v. Moralesgreen1 sentence2021See People v. Givens, 237 Ill. 2d 311, 323-24 (2010) (“[A]s a general rule, [o]ur adversary system is designed around the premise that the parties know what is best for them, and are responsible for - 10 - advancing the facts and arguments entitling them to relief.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)). ¶ 29 Regarding their third point, the objectors attempt without explanation to transplant the void-for-vagueness doctrine, which generally applies only to criminal statutes (see City of Chicago v. Morales, 177 Ill. 2d 440, 448-49 (1997)), to the context of this case. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Givensgreen1 sentence2021See People v. Givens, 237 Ill. 2d 311, 323-24 (2010) (“[A]s a general rule, [o]ur adversary system is designed around the premise that the parties know what is best for them, and are responsible for - 10 - advancing the facts and arguments entitling them to relief.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)). ¶ 29 Regarding their third point, the objectors attempt without explanation to transplant the void-for-vagueness doctrine, which generally applies only to criminal statutes (see City of Chicago v. Morales, 177 Ill. 2d 440, 448-49 (1997)), to the context of this case. | 1 | 1 |
Stanley v. Illinoisgreen2 sentences2001In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 27 , 101 S.Ct. 2153, 2159-60 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640, 649-50 (1981), quoting Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 , 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1212 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551, 558 (1972), the Supreme Court wrote: "This Court's decisions have by now made plain beyond the need for multiple citation that a parent's desire for and right to `the companionship, care, custody, and management of his or her children' is an important interest that `undeniably warrants deference and, absent a powerful counterveiling interest, protection.'" Our own supreme court recognized 2001In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 27 , 101 S.Ct. 2153, 2159-60 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640, 649-50 (1981), quoting Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 , 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1212 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551, 558 (1972), the Supreme Court wrote: "This Court's decisions have by now made plain beyond the need for multiple citation that a parent's desire for and right to `the companionship, care, custody, and management of his or her children' is an important interest that `undeniably warrants deference and, absent a powerful counterveiling interest, protection.'" Our own supreme court recognized | 1 | 1 |
In Re Paulgreen2 sentences2001In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 27 , 101 S.Ct. 2153, 2159-60 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640, 649-50 (1981), quoting Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 , 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1212 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551, 558 (1972), the Supreme Court wrote: "This Court's decisions have by now made plain beyond the need for multiple citation that a parent's desire for and right to `the companionship, care, custody, and management of his or her children' is an important interest that `undeniably warrants deference and, absent a powerful counterveiling interest, protection.'" Our own supreme court recognized 2001In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 27 , 101 S.Ct. 2153, 2159-60 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640, 649-50 (1981), quoting Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 , 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1212 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551, 558 (1972), the Supreme Court wrote: "This Court's decisions have by now made plain beyond the need for multiple citation that a parent's desire for and right to `the companionship, care, custody, and management of his or her children' is an important interest that `undeniably warrants deference and, absent a powerful counterveiling interest, protection.'" Our own supreme court recognized | 1 | 1 |
Grayned v. City of Rockfordgreen2 sentences1997Kolender, 461 U.S. at 357 , 103 S.Ct. at 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 909 ; Grayned, 408 U.S. at 108, 92 S.Ct. at 2298-99 , 33 L.Ed.2d at 227 ; Bailey, 167 Ill.2d at 228 , 212 Ill.Dec. 608 , 657 N.E.2d 953 . 1997Kolender, 461 U.S. at 357 , 103 S.Ct. at 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 909 ; Grayned, 408 U.S. at 108, 92 S.Ct. at 2298-99 , 33 L.Ed.2d at 227 ; Bailey, 167 Ill.2d at 228 , 212 Ill.Dec. 608 , 657 N.E.2d 953 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kolender v. Lawson
green
2 sentences1995The void-for-vagueness doctrine requires that a penal statute define the criminal offense (1) with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and (2) in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. ( Kolender v. Lawson (1983), 461 U.S. 352, 357 , 103 S.Ct. 1855, 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903, 909 .) Although the doctrine focuses on both actual notice to citizens and arbitrary enforcement, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that the more important aspect of the vagueness doctrine "`is not actual notice, but the other 1995The void-for-vagueness doctrine requires that a penal statute define the criminal offense (1) with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and (2) in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. ( Kolender v. Lawson (1983), 461 U.S. 352, 357 , 103 S.Ct. 1855, 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903, 909 .) Although the doctrine focuses on both actual notice to citizens and arbitrary enforcement, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that the more important aspect of the vagueness doctrine "`is not actual notice, but the other | 4 | 1988–1997 |
Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation
green
2 sentences2003In Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, 154 Ill. 2d 138 , this court considered the void for vagueness doctrine in a disciplinary action brought against a dentist for violation of the advertising provisions of the Dental Practice Act. 2003In Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, 154 Ill.2d 138 , 180 Ill.Dec. 713 , 607 N.E.2d 1226 , this court considered the void for vagueness doctrine in a disciplinary action brought against a dentist for violation of the advertising provisions of the Dental Practice Act. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Steele
green
1 sentence2001In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 27 , 101 S.Ct. 2153, 2159-60 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640, 649-50 (1981), quoting Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 , 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1212 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551, 558 (1972), the Supreme Court wrote: "This Court's decisions have by now made plain beyond the need for multiple citation that a parent's desire for and right to `the companionship, care, custody, and management of his or her children' is an important interest that `undeniably warrants deference and, absent a powerful counterveiling interest, protection.'" Our own supreme court recognized | 1 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Bailey
green
2 sentences1997Kolender, 461 U.S. at 357 , 103 S.Ct. at 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 909 ; Grayned, 408 U.S. at 108, 92 S.Ct. at 2298-99 , 33 L.Ed.2d at 227 ; Bailey, 167 Ill.2d at 228 , 212 Ill.Dec. 608 , 657 N.E.2d 953 . 1997Kolender, 461 U.S. at 357 , 103 S.Ct. at 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 909 ; Grayned, 408 U.S. at 108, 92 S.Ct. at 2298-99 , 33 L.Ed.2d at 227 ; Bailey, 167 Ill.2d at 228 , 212 Ill.Dec. 608 , 657 N.E.2d 953 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Smith v. Goguen
green
2 sentences1995The void-for-vagueness doctrine requires that a penal statute define the criminal offense (1) with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and (2) in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. ( Kolender v. Lawson (1983), 461 U.S. 352, 357 , 103 S.Ct. 1855, 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903, 909 .) Although the doctrine focuses on both actual notice to citizens and arbitrary enforcement, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that the more important aspect of the vagueness doctrine "`is not actual notice, but the other 1995The void-for-vagueness doctrine requires that a penal statute define the criminal offense (1) with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and (2) in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. ( Kolender v. Lawson (1983), 461 U.S. 352, 357 , 103 S.Ct. 1855, 1858 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903, 909 .) Although the doctrine focuses on both actual notice to citizens and arbitrary enforcement, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that the more important aspect of the vagueness doctrine "`is not actual notice, but the other | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Lowe
green
1 sentence1992App. 3d 648, 653 , 560 N.E.2d 438, 441 , this court further explained the void-for-vagueness doctrine as follows: “Criminal statutes are inherently limited to words as their medium. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
In Re GAULT
green
2 sentences1978Moreover, insofar as the ultimate consequences of the respondent’s violation of the conditions of his supervision so closely parallel those of an adult’s violation of a penal statute (see In re Gault (1967), 387 U.S. 1, 27 , 18 L. 1978Moreover, insofar as the ultimate consequences of the respondent’s violation of the conditions of his supervision so closely parallel those of an adult’s violation of a penal statute (see In re Gault (1967), 387 U.S. 1, 27 , 18 L. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
green
1 sentence1978Ed. 2d 647 , 91 S. Ct. 1976 ), we nevertheless are of the opinion that the principles of due process encompassed within the void-for-vagueness doctrine are so fundamental that there can be no doubt as to their applicability to juveniles. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.