Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hornecker v. Stategreen2 sentences2006"The plain language of the rule gives the district court judge discretion to include any information which may aid him in his task of imposing a fair sentence in light of all the *596 available facts without limitation." Hornecker v. State, 977 P.2d 1289, 1292 (Wyo.1999). 2000Hornecker v. State, 977 P.2d 1289, 1292 (Wyo.1999). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Jesus Quiroz-Cortezgreen1 sentence2003United States v. Quiroz-Cortez, 960 F.2d 418, 420 (5th Cir.1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cuevasgreen2 sentences1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. 1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In the Matter of the Estate of Robert S. Meeker, Robin Meeker Gaston, Misty S. Oxborrow, and Dustin D. Meeker v. Carole L. Wagner
green
2 sentences2025Corp., ¶ 26, 471 P.3d at 299 (citing Estate of Meeker, ¶ 8, 397 P.3d at 186 ). [¶36] W.R.C.P. 3 is clear and unambiguous. 2020Id. “‘We begin by making an inquiry respecting the ordinary and obvious meaning of the words employed, according to their arrangement and connection. | 2 | 2020–2025 |
Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A Welldog v. New Horizon Ventures Pty Ltd, as Trustee of the Linklater Family Trust and Ewan Meldrum, as Trustee of the Meldrum Family Trust
green
1 sentence2025Corp., ¶ 26, 471 P.3d at 299 (citing Estate of Meeker, ¶ 8, 397 P.3d at 186 ). [¶36] W.R.C.P. 3 is clear and unambiguous. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Busch v. HORTON AUTOMATICS, INC.
green
1 sentence2015Id. [¶9] Rule 41(d) states: If a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant, the court may make such order for the payment of costs of the action previously dismissed as it may deem proper and may stay the proceedings in the action until the plaintiff has complied with the order. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Marquess v. State
green
2 sentences2012Any suggestion in Lancaster to the contrary is dict@ and inconsistent with the plain language of the rule and our precedent." Marquess, 2011 WY 95 , 1 16 n. 5, 256 P.3d at 512 n. 5. [T14]) At trial, the thrust of the appellant's argument in his opening statement was that the appellant reasonably believed that MY had consented to sexual activity. 2012Any suggestion in Lancaster to the contrary is dict@ and inconsistent with the plain language of the rule and our precedent." Marquess, 2011 WY 95 , 1 16 n. 5, 256 P.3d at 512 n. 5. [T14]) At trial, the thrust of the appellant's argument in his opening statement was that the appellant reasonably believed that MY had consented to sexual activity. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Glover v. Crayk
green
1 sentence2008In other words, provided the district court's action involves only correction of a clerical mistake, no due process violation occurs when that correction is made without giving the parties the opportunity to be heard. [117] In Glover, ¶9, 122 P.3d at 958 , this Court stated that in reviewing a district court's application of Rule 60(a), we apply a two-part process. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Tome v. United States
green
2 sentences1999In reaching its conclusion, the United States Supreme Court noted that "[t]he Rule speaks of a party rebutting an alleged motive, not bolstering the veracity of the story told." Tome, 513 U.S. at 157-58 , 115 S.Ct. at 701 . 1999In reaching its conclusion, the United States Supreme Court noted that "[t]he Rule speaks of a party rebutting an alleged motive, not bolstering the veracity of the story told." Tome, 513 U.S. at 157-58 , 115 S.Ct. at 701 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Kelly
green
2 sentences1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. 1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Bryant
green
2 sentences1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. 1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Jent
neutral
2 sentences1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. 1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Cooke
green
2 sentences1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. 1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Hansen
green
2 sentences1976To what extent the jury relied on the presumption in returning its verdict, "[we] can only assume that the jurors were intelligent and practical people who took the court at its word and were guided by the plain language of the instruction." State v. Hansen, 203 N.W.2d 216 (Ia. 1972) holds that that part of one instruction which quotes the statutory language that the presence of a stipulated percentage of alcohol in defendant's blood is "presumptive evidence" of intoxication, is permissible, but that it is erroneous when it converts it into a conclusive presumption if evidence is not produced 1976To what extent the jury relied on the presumption in returning its verdict, “[we] can only assume that the jurors were intelligent and practical people who took the court at its word and were guided by the plain language of the instruction.” State v. Hansen, 203 N.W.2d 216 (Ia.1972) holds that that part of one instruction which quotes the statutory language that the presence of a stipulated percentage of alcohol in defendant’s blood is “presumptive evidence” of intoxication, is permissible, but that it is erroneous when it converts it into a conclusive presumption if evidence is not produced t | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Brady
green
2 sentences1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. 1976See also State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110 , 488 P.2d 322 (1971); State v. Jent, 270 N.C. 652 , 155 S.E.2d 171 (1967); State v. Cooke, 270 N.C. 644 , 155 S.E.2d 165 (1967); State v. Bryant, 245 N.C. 645 , 97 S.E.2d 264 (1957); State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N.W.2d 554 , 162 A.L.R. 477 (1944); State v. Brady, 121 Ia. 561 , 97 N.W. 62 (1903); and an annotation in 16 A.L.R.3d 748 on statutes creating inferences and presumptions of intoxication. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.