Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bettencourt v. Bettencourtgreen2 sentences2025See Bettencourt v. Bettencourt, 80 Hawai#i 225, 230, 909 P.2d 553, 558 (1995) ("The burden is upon appellant in an appeal to show error by reference to matters in the record, and [they have] the responsibility of providing an adequate transcript." (quoting Union Bldg. 2025See Bettencourt v. Bettencourt, 80 Hawai#i 225, 230, 909 P.2d 553, 558 (1995) ("The burden is upon appellant in an appeal to show error by reference to matters in the record, and [they have] the responsibility of providing an adequate transcript." (quoting Union Bldg. | 2 | 2 |
In the Interest of Doegreen2 sentences2007See, e.g., In the Interest of John Doe, born on August 3, 1977, 73 Haw. 89, 94 , 828 P.2d 272, 275 (1992) ("[T]he construction of [a] statute by the agency charged with its administration is entitled to substantial deference.... 2007See, e.g., In the Interest of John Doe, born on August 3, 1977, 73 Haw. 89, 94 , 828 P.2d 272, 275 (1992) ("[T]he construction of [a] statute by the agency charged with its administration is entitled to substantial deference.... | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Malmingreen2 sentences1996See e.g., In re Fee, 182 Ariz. 597 , 898 P.2d 975, 979 (1995) (failure to disclose separate fee agreement to settlement judge to avoid jeopardizing settlement proceeding constituted violation of disciplinary rule prohibiting lawyers from knowingly making false statements of material fact to a tribunal and from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation; “system cannot function as intended if attorneys, sworn officers of the court, can ... mislead judges in the guise of serving their clients”); Di Sabatino v. State Bar of California, 27 Cal.3d 159 , 162 Cal.Rptr. 458 1996See e.g., In re Fee, 182 Ariz. 597 , 898 P.2d 975, 979 (1995) (failure to disclose separate fee agreement to settlement judge to avoid jeopardizing settlement proceeding constituted violation of disciplinary rule prohibiting lawyers from knowingly making false statements of material fact to a tribunal and from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation; “system cannot function as intended if attorneys, sworn officers of the court, can ... mislead judges in the guise of serving their clients”); Di Sabatino v. State Bar of California, 27 Cal.3d 159 , 162 Cal.Rptr. 458 | 1 | 1 |
In Re Feegreen2 sentences1996See e.g., In re Fee, 182 Ariz. 597 , 898 P.2d 975, 979 (1995) (failure to disclose separate fee agreement to settlement judge to avoid jeopardizing settlement proceeding constituted violation of disciplinary rule prohibiting lawyers from knowingly making false statements of material fact to a tribunal and from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation; “system cannot function as intended if attorneys, sworn officers of the court, can ... mislead judges in the guise of serving their clients”); Di Sabatino v. State Bar of California, 27 Cal.3d 159 , 162 Cal.Rptr. 458 1996See e.g., In re Fee, 182 Ariz. 597 , 898 P.2d 975, 979 (1995) (failure to disclose separate fee agreement to settlement judge to avoid jeopardizing settlement proceeding constituted violation of disciplinary rule prohibiting lawyers from knowingly making false statements of material fact to a tribunal and from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation; “system cannot function as intended if attorneys, sworn officers of the court, can ... mislead judges in the guise of serving their clients”); Di Sabatino v. State Bar of California, 27 Cal.3d 159 , 162 Cal.Rptr. 458 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maui Lani Neighbors v. State
green
2 sentences2025Therefore, because exhaustion and the related doctrine of primary jurisdiction are judicially created, “they do not limit enforcement of article XI, section 9 claims.” Id. 2025Therefore, because exhaustion and the related doctrine of primary jurisdiction are judicially created, “they do not limit enforcement of article XI, section 9 claims.” Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Deleon
green
2 sentences2019Although we did not hold that the OTCs were travel agencies for all purposes, the Director does not dispute the OTCs' status as travel agencies in the transactions in this case. 31 As discussed infra , canons of statutory construction may in some instances justify departing from the plain meaning of this type of "catch-all" residual clause. 32 Related , Dictionary.com Unabridged , http://www.dictionary.com/browse/related (last visited Feb. 20, 2019). 33 This court has also employed a related doctrine, noscitur a sociis (literally, "it is known by its associates") which we have freely translate 2019Although we did not hold that the OTCs were travel agencies for all purposes, the Director does not dispute the OTCs' status as travel agencies in the transactions in this case. 31 As discussed infra , canons of statutory construction may in some instances justify departing from the plain meaning of this type of "catch-all" residual clause. 32 Related , Dictionary.com Unabridged , http://www.dictionary.com/browse/related (last visited Feb. 20, 2019). 33 This court has also employed a related doctrine, noscitur a sociis (literally, "it is known by its associates") which we have freely translate | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In Re Peterson v. Hawaii Electric Light Co.
green
2 sentences2019The doctrine "provides that the meaning of words may be determined by reference to their relationship with other associated words and phrases." Peterson , 85 Hawai'i at 328 , 944 P.2d at 1271 . 2019The doctrine "provides that the meaning of words may be determined by reference to their relationship with other associated words and phrases." Peterson , 85 Hawai'i at 328 , 944 P.2d at 1271 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Kona Old Hawaiian Trails Group Ex Rel. Serrano v. Lyman
green
2 sentences2012In Kona Old Hawaiian Trails Group v. Lyman, 69 Haw. 81 , 734 P.2d 161 (1987), the Hawaii Supreme Court explained the doctrine of primary jurisdiction and the related doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies: Courts have “developed two principal doctrines to enable the question of timing of requests for judicial intervention in the administrative process to be answered: (1) primary jurisdiction; and (2) exhaustion of administrative remedies.” B. 2012In Kona Old Hawaiian Trails Group v. Lyman, 69 Haw. 81 , 734 P.2d 161 (1987), the Hawaii Supreme Court explained the doctrine of primary jurisdiction and the related doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies: Courts have “developed two principal doctrines to enable the question of timing of requests for judicial intervention in the administrative process to be answered: (1) primary jurisdiction; and (2) exhaustion of administrative remedies.” B. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Di Sabatino v. State Bar
green
2 sentences1996See e.g., In re Fee, 182 Ariz. 597 , 898 P.2d 975, 979 (1995) (failure to disclose separate fee agreement to settlement judge to avoid jeopardizing settlement proceeding constituted violation of disciplinary rule prohibiting lawyers from knowingly making false statements of material fact to a tribunal and from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation; “system cannot function as intended if attorneys, sworn officers of the court, can ... mislead judges in the guise of serving their clients”); Di Sabatino v. State Bar of California, 27 Cal.3d 159 , 162 Cal.Rptr. 458 1996See e.g., In re Fee, 182 Ariz. 597 , 898 P.2d 975, 979 (1995) (failure to disclose separate fee agreement to settlement judge to avoid jeopardizing settlement proceeding constituted violation of disciplinary rule prohibiting lawyers from knowingly making false statements of material fact to a tribunal and from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation; “system cannot function as intended if attorneys, sworn officers of the court, can ... mislead judges in the guise of serving their clients”); Di Sabatino v. State Bar of California, 27 Cal.3d 159 , 162 Cal.Rptr. 458 | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Glover v. Fong
green
2 sentences1994The “law of the case” doctrine does not present as formidable an obstacle to reconsideration as the doetime of stare decisis or the related doctrine of res judicata. 4 This court has explicitly recognized that the “law of the case” doctrine “is akin to res judicata ... but is not subject to the inflexibility of res judicata.” Robinson, 65 Haw. at 652 n. 9, 658 P.2d at 297 n. 9 (quoting Glover, 42 Haw. at 578 ). 1994The "law of the case" doctrine does not present as formidable an obstacle to reconsideration as the doctrine of stare decisis or the related doctrine of res judicata. [4] This court has explicitly recognized that the "law of the case" doctrine "is akin to res judicata... but is not subject to the inflexibility of res judicata." Robinson, 65 Haw. at 652 n. 9, 658 P.2d at 297 n. 9 (quoting Glover, 42 Haw. at 578 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Robinson v. Ariyoshi
green
2 sentences1994The “law of the case” doctrine does not present as formidable an obstacle to reconsideration as the doetime of stare decisis or the related doctrine of res judicata. 4 This court has explicitly recognized that the “law of the case” doctrine “is akin to res judicata ... but is not subject to the inflexibility of res judicata.” Robinson, 65 Haw. at 652 n. 9, 658 P.2d at 297 n. 9 (quoting Glover, 42 Haw. at 578 ). 1994The “law of the case” doctrine does not present as formidable an obstacle to reconsideration as the doetime of stare decisis or the related doctrine of res judicata. 4 This court has explicitly recognized that the “law of the case” doctrine “is akin to res judicata ... but is not subject to the inflexibility of res judicata.” Robinson, 65 Haw. at 652 n. 9, 658 P.2d at 297 n. 9 (quoting Glover, 42 Haw. at 578 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Hata v. Dean Witter
neutral
1 sentence1990Hata v. Dean Witter, 32 Haw. 760 (1933); DeFreitas v. Trustees of the Campbell Estate, 46 Haw. 425 , 380 P.2d 762 (1963). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
De Freitas v. Coke
green
2 sentences1990Hata v. Dean Witter, 32 Haw. 760 (1933); DeFreitas v. Trustees of the Campbell Estate, 46 Haw. 425 , 380 P.2d 762 (1963). 1990Hata v. Dean Witter, 32 Haw. 760 (1933); DeFreitas v. Trustees of the Campbell Estate, 46 Haw. 425 , 380 P.2d 762 (1963). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.