Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Scannelly, 1100226 (Ala. 6-30-2011)green1 sentence2025However, we noted that those doctrines, like other affirmative defenses, could be properly asserted in a motion to dismiss only if those defenses were "readily apparent from the face of the complaint." Scannelly, 74 So. 3d at 439. | 1 | 1 |
Sorrell v. Stategreen2 sentences1986The corroboration of an accomplice may be shown by circumstantial evidence.” These rules must also be considered along with the related principle set forth by the Alabama Supreme Court in Sorrell v. State, 249 Ala. 292, 293 , 31 So.2d 82, 83 (1947): “The corroboration necessary to support the testimony of an accomplice must be of some fact tending to prove the guilt of the accused. 1986The corroboration of an accomplice may be shown by circumstantial evidence.” These rules must also be considered along with the related principle set forth by the Alabama Supreme Court in Sorrell v. State, 249 Ala. 292, 293 , 31 So.2d 82, 83 (1947): “The corroboration necessary to support the testimony of an accomplice must be of some fact tending to prove the guilt of the accused. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Tony's Towing, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003We recognized in Tony's Towing that, within the context of the doctrine of intertwining, the "the doctrine of estoppel operates to prevent a signatory to an arbitration agreement from frustrating arbitration of a related claim against a nonsignatory where the nonsignatory seeks arbitration. " 825 So.2d at 98 . 2002The arbitration provision explicitly stated that the director's decision "shall be final, binding and conclusive on the parties to the contract ." (Emphasis added.) "[T]he doctrine of estoppel operates to prevent a signatory to an arbitration agreement from frustrating arbitration of a related claim against a nonsignatory where the nonsignatory seeks arbitration ." Ex parte Tony's Towing, Inc. , 825 So.2d 96 , 98 (Ala. 2002). | 2 | 2002–2003 |
Roselle Park Trust Co. v. Ward Baking Corp.
green
2 sentences2024Trust Co. v. Ward Baking Corp., [ 177 Md. 212 ,] 220, 9 A.2d 228 [1939)] (' "A statute that directs a thing to be done in a particular manner ordinarily 5 CR-2023-0812 implies that it shall not be done otherwise." '); 2A Sutherland, supra, §§ 57.14-57.18." Office & Pro. 2024Trust Co. v. Ward Baking Corp., [ 177 Md. 212 ,] 220, 9 A.2d 228 [1939)] (' "A statute that directs a thing to be done in a particular manner ordinarily 5 CR-2023-0812 implies that it shall not be done otherwise." '); 2A Sutherland, supra, §§ 57.14-57.18." Office & Pro. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Jenkins v. Atelier Homes, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014Jenkins v. Atelier Homes, Inc., 62 So.3d 504 (Ala.2010). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State Ex Rel. Foshee v. Butler
neutral
2 sentences1953Foshee v. Butler, 225 Ala. 194, 195 , 142 So. 533, 534 . 1953Foshee v. Butler, 225 Ala. 194, 195 , 142 So. 533, 534 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.