60 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1924–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marques v. Rossgreen2 sentences1989See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 (200 *111 SE 184).’ Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ); NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. . . .” Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525, 526 (2) ( 136 SE2d 399 ). 1970As was held in Young v. Kickliter, 213 Ga. 42 , supra; Chattanooga Publishing Co. v. Fulton, 215 Ga. 880 (3), supra; Mason v. Powell, 92 Ga. App. 496 , supra; Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 , supra; Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 , supra; Roe *387 buck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525 (2), supra; Lee v. Swann, 111 Ga. App. 88 , supra, and others, knowledge of the driver’s incompetency is an essential element of the rule which holds an owner liable for furnishing his motor vehicle to an incompetent driver, and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. | 3 | 4 |
Holt v. Eastern Motor Companygreen2 sentences1989See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 (200 *111 SE 184).’ Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ); NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. . . .” Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525, 526 (2) ( 136 SE2d 399 ). 1989See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 (200 *111 SE 184).’ Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ); NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. . . .” Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525, 526 (2) ( 136 SE2d 399 ). | 3 | 3 |
Szurovy v. Oldermangreen2 sentences2018See Szurovy v. Olderman , 243 Ga. App. at 453 , 530 S.E.2d 783 . 2018See Szurovy v. Olderman , 243 Ga. App. at 453 , 530 S.E.2d 783 . | 2 | 2 |
Hardaway Co. v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc.green2 sentences2016The elements of a claim for negligent misrepresentation are: “(1) the defendant’s negligent supply of false information to foreseeable persons, known or unknown; (2) such persons’ reasonable reliance upon that false information; and (3) economic injury proximately resulting from such reliance.” (Footnote omitted.) Hardaway Co. v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., 267 Ga. 424, 426 (1) ( 479 SE2d 727 ) (1997). “[J]ustifiable reliance is an essential element of a claim asserting negligent misrepresentation.” (Footnote omitted.) Anderson v. Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games, 261 2016The elements of a claim for negligent misrepresentation are: “(1) the defendant’s negligent supply of false information to foreseeable persons, known or unknown; (2) such persons’ reasonable reliance upon that false information; and (3) economic injury proximately resulting from such reliance.” (Footnote omitted.) Hardaway Co. v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., 267 Ga. 424, 426 (1) ( 479 SE2d 727 ) (1997). “[J]ustifiable reliance is an essential element of a claim asserting negligent misrepresentation.” (Footnote omitted.) Anderson v. Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games, 261 | 2 | 2 |
Anderson v. Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games, Inc.green2 sentences2016The elements of a claim for negligent misrepresentation are: “(1) the defendant’s negligent supply of false information to foreseeable persons, known or unknown; (2) such persons’ reasonable reliance upon that false information; and (3) economic injury proximately resulting from such reliance.” (Footnote omitted.) Hardaway Co. v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., 267 Ga. 424, 426 (1) ( 479 SE2d 727 ) (1997). “[J]ustifiable reliance is an essential element of a claim asserting negligent misrepresentation.” (Footnote omitted.) Anderson v. Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games, 261 2016The elements of a claim for negligent misrepresentation are: “(1) the defendant’s negligent supply of false information to foreseeable persons, known or unknown; (2) such persons’ reasonable reliance upon that false information; and (3) economic injury proximately resulting from such reliance.” (Footnote omitted.) Hardaway Co. v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., 267 Ga. 424, 426 (1) ( 479 SE2d 727 ) (1997). “[J]ustifiable reliance is an essential element of a claim asserting negligent misrepresentation.” (Footnote omitted.) Anderson v. Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games, 261 | 2 | 2 |
Cowart v. Widenergreen2 sentences2015See Cowart, 287 Ga. at 623 (explaining that to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a defendant who will not bear the burden of proof at trial need not affirmatively disprove the plaintiff’s claim but may point out by reference to evidence in the record the absence of evidence to support an essential element of the claim). 2015See Cowart, 287 Ga. at 623 (explaining that to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a defendant who will not bear the burden of proof at trial need not affirmatively disprove the plaintiff’s claim but may point out by reference to evidence in the record the absence of evidence to support an essential element of the claim). | 2 | 2 |
Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of Transportationgreen2 sentences2014The Supreme Court of Georgia has held that “[e]ach party has a duty to present his best case on a motion for summary judgment.” Pfeiffer v. Ga. Dept. of Transp., 275 Ga. 827, 828 (2) ( 573 SE2d 389 ) (2002). 2014The Supreme Court of Georgia has held that “[e]ach party has a duty to present his best case on a motion for summary judgment.” Pfeiffer v. Ga. Dept. of Transp., 275 Ga. 827, 828 (2) ( 573 SE2d 389 ) (2002). | 2 | 2 |
BASHLOR v. Walkergreen2 sentences2014(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Bashlor v. Walker, 303 Ga. App. 478, 480 (1) (a) ( 693 SE2d 858 ) (2010); see also Jones v. Cloud, 119 Ga. App. 697, 699 ( 168 SE2d 598 ) (1969) (“Knowledge of the driver’s incompetency is an essential element of the rule which holds an owner liable for furnishing his automobile to an incompetent driver and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive”) (citations and punctuation omitted). 2014(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Bashlor v. Walker, 303 Ga. App. 478, 480 (1) (a) ( 693 SE2d 858 ) (2010); see also Jones v. Cloud, 119 Ga. App. 697, 699 ( 168 SE2d 598 ) (1969) (“Knowledge of the driver’s incompetency is an essential element of the rule which holds an owner liable for furnishing his automobile to an incompetent driver and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive”) (citations and punctuation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Jones v. Cloudgreen2 sentences2014(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Bashlor v. Walker, 303 Ga. App. 478, 480 (1) (a) ( 693 SE2d 858 ) (2010); see also Jones v. Cloud, 119 Ga. App. 697, 699 ( 168 SE2d 598 ) (1969) (“Knowledge of the driver’s incompetency is an essential element of the rule which holds an owner liable for furnishing his automobile to an incompetent driver and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive”) (citations and punctuation omitted). 2014(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Bashlor v. Walker, 303 Ga. App. 478, 480 (1) (a) ( 693 SE2d 858 ) (2010); see also Jones v. Cloud, 119 Ga. App. 697, 699 ( 168 SE2d 598 ) (1969) (“Knowledge of the driver’s incompetency is an essential element of the rule which holds an owner liable for furnishing his automobile to an incompetent driver and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive”) (citations and punctuation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Willis v. United Family Life Insurancegreen2 sentences2012See Willis v. United Family Life Ins., 226 Ga. App. 661, 662 (1) ( 487 SE2d 376 ) (1997). 2012See Willis v. United Family Life Ins., 226 Ga. App. 661, 662 (1) ( 487 SE2d 376 ) (1997). | 2 | 2 |
Mitchell v. BACKUS CADILLAC-PONTIAC, INC.green2 sentences2012“Proof that [a] car was defective when sold is an essential element of this claim.” Mitchell, 274 Ga. App. at 338-339 (6). 2012“Proof that [a] car was defective when sold is an essential element of this claim.” Mitchell, 274 Ga. App. at 338-339 (6). | 2 | 2 |
Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty Partnershipgreen2 sentences2000As the same principles apply to both fraud and negligent misrepresentation (Robert & Co. Assoc. v. Rhodes-Haverty Partnership, 250 Ga. 680, 681 ( 300 SE2d 503 ) [(1983)]; American Legion v. Foote & Davies, Inc., 193 Ga. App. 225 , *772 227 ( 387 SE2d 380 ) [(1989)]), justifiable reliance is also an essential element of a claim asserting negligent misrepresentation. 2000As the same principles apply to both fraud and negligent misrepresentation (Robert & Co. Assoc. v. Rhodes-Haverty Partnership, 250 Ga. 680, 681 ( 300 SE2d 503 ) [(1983)]; American Legion v. Foote & Davies, Inc., 193 Ga. App. 225 , *772 227 ( 387 SE2d 380 ) [(1989)]), justifiable reliance is also an essential element of a claim asserting negligent misrepresentation. | 2 | 2 |
Richard A. Naso & Associates, Inc. v. Diffusiongreen2 sentences1993Horst, for appellees. “[P]roof that [Wyle or Haraway] induced the employees to leave [Avnet and Hall-Mark] is an essential element of the claim. [Cit.]” Richard A. Naso &c. v. Diffusion, 194 Ga. App. 201, 204 ( 390 SE2d 106 ) (1990). 1993Horst, for appellees. “[P]roof that [Wyle or Haraway] induced the employees to leave [Avnet and Hall-Mark] is an essential element of the claim. [Cit.]” Richard A. Naso &c. v. Diffusion, 194 Ga. App. 201, 204 ( 390 SE2d 106 ) (1990). | 2 | 2 |
Roebuck v. Paynegreen2 sentences1989See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 (200 *111 SE 184).’ Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ); NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. . . .” Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525, 526 (2) ( 136 SE2d 399 ). 1970As was held in Young v. Kickliter, 213 Ga. 42 , supra; Chattanooga Publishing Co. v. Fulton, 215 Ga. 880 (3), supra; Mason v. Powell, 92 Ga. App. 496 , supra; Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 , supra; Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 , supra; Roe *387 buck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525 (2), supra; Lee v. Swann, 111 Ga. App. 88 , supra, and others, knowledge of the driver’s incompetency is an essential element of the rule which holds an owner liable for furnishing his motor vehicle to an incompetent driver, and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. | 1 | 4 |
American Legion v. Foote & Davies, Inc.green2 sentences2000As the same principles apply to both fraud and negligent misrepresentation (Robert & Co. Assoc. v. Rhodes-Haverty Partnership, 250 Ga. 680, 681 ( 300 SE2d 503 ) [(1983)]; American Legion v. Foote & Davies, Inc., 193 Ga. App. 225 , *772 227 ( 387 SE2d 380 ) [(1989)]), justifiable reliance is also an essential element of a claim asserting negligent misrepresentation. 2000As the same principles apply to both fraud and negligent misrepresentation (Robert & Co. Assoc. v. Rhodes-Haverty Partnership, 250 Ga. 680, 681 ( 300 SE2d 503 ) [(1983)]; American Legion v. Foote & Davies, Inc., 193 Ga. App. 225 , *772 227 ( 387 SE2d 380 ) [(1989)]), justifiable reliance is also an essential element of a claim asserting negligent misrepresentation. | 1 | 2 |
Lord v. Lowegreen2 sentences2025Even when a complaint is liberally construed, there still must be some legal basis for recovery.” Lord v. Lowe, 318 Ga. App. 222, 223 ( 741 SE2d 155 ) (2012) (citations and punctuation omitted). 2025Even when a complaint is liberally construed, there still must be some legal basis for recovery.” Lord v. Lowe, 318 Ga. App. 222, 223 ( 741 SE2d 155 ) (2012) (citations and punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Bullock v. Jeongreen2 sentences2022An essential element of this claim “is a showing of financial injury resulting from the alleged interference.” Bullock v. Jeon, 226 Ga. App. 875, 878 (3) ( 487 SE2d 692 ) (1997). 2022An essential element of this claim “is a showing of financial injury resulting from the alleged interference.” Bullock v. Jeon, 226 Ga. App. 875, 878 (3) ( 487 SE2d 692 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
MILLER v. FIBERLIGHT, LLC Et Al.green2 sentences2022See Miller v. FiberLight, 343 Ga. App. 593, 607 (4) ( 808 SE2d 75 ) (2017) (“‘[T]o state a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, a plaintiff must allege a specific obligation implied in the contract, a breach of that obligation, and resulting damages.’”) (applying Delaware law) (quoting CMS Investment Holdings v. Castle, No. 9468-VCP, 2015 Del. 2022See Miller v. FiberLight, 343 Ga. App. 593, 607 (4) ( 808 SE2d 75 ) (2017) (“‘[T]o state a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, a plaintiff must allege a specific obligation implied in the contract, a breach of that obligation, and resulting damages.’”) (applying Delaware law) (quoting CMS Investment Holdings v. Castle, No. 9468-VCP, 2015 Del. | 1 | 1 |
Niloy & Rohan, LLC v. Sechlergreen2 sentences2022See Niloy & Rohan, LLC v. Sechler, 335 Ga. App. 507, 510 (1) (a) ( 782 SE2d 293 ) (2016). 2022See Niloy & Rohan, LLC v. Sechler, 335 Ga. App. 507, 510 (1) (a) ( 782 SE2d 293 ) (2016). | 1 | 1 |
Hunting Aircraft, Inc. v. Peachtree City Airport Authoritygreen2 sentences2022Hunting Aircraft v. Peachtree City Airport Auth., 281 Ga. App. 450, 451-452 (1) ( 636 SE2d 139 ) (2006) (citations, punctuation, and emphasis omitted). 18 While research has revealed no Georgia appellate decisions addressing this issue, the jurisdictions that have addressed it agree that damage resulting from the breach is an essential element of a claim for a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. 2022Hunting Aircraft v. Peachtree City Airport Auth., 281 Ga. App. 450, 451-452 (1) ( 636 SE2d 139 ) (2006) (citations, punctuation, and emphasis omitted). 18 While research has revealed no Georgia appellate decisions addressing this issue, the jurisdictions that have addressed it agree that damage resulting from the breach is an essential element of a claim for a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. | 1 | 1 |
McAlister v. Cliftongreen1 sentence2022Proof of damages is an essential element to a claim for breach of contract, and a failure to prove damages is fatal to a plaintiff’s claim.” McAlister v. Clifton, 313 Ga. 737, 742 (2) ( 873 SE2d 178 ) (2022) (citations and punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Ezorgreen2 sentences2021Here, there is not an absence of testimony on the essential element of the standard of care; but instead, conflicts in an expert’s testimony that “go solely to the expert’s credibility, and are to be assessed by the jury when weighing the expert’s testimony.” Thompson v. Ezor, 272 Ga. 849, 852 (2) ( 536 SE2d 749 ) (2000). 2021Here, there is not an absence of testimony on the essential element of the standard of care; but instead, conflicts in an expert’s testimony that “go solely to the expert’s credibility, and are to be assessed by the jury when weighing the expert’s testimony.” Thompson v. Ezor, 272 Ga. 849, 852 (2) ( 536 SE2d 749 ) (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Swint v. Alphonsegreen2 sentences2021See also Swint v. Alphonse, 348 Ga. App. 199, 205 (1) ( 820 SE2d 312 ) (2018). 2021See also Swint v. Alphonse, 348 Ga. App. 199, 205 (1) ( 820 SE2d 312 ) (2018). | 1 | 1 |
| Sinclair v. Friedlandergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Rivera v. Washingtongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Eshleman v. Keygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Nebo Ventures, LLC v. Novapro Risk Solutions, L.P.green | 1 | 1 |
| Artzner v. a & a EXTERMINATORS, INC.green | 1 | 1 |
| Walden v. Smithgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Duke Galish, LLC v. Mantongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Carter v. Willowrun Condominium Ass'ngreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hathcock v. Hathcockgreen | 1 | 1 |
| White v. BDO Seidman, LLPgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Henderson v. Hamesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Graivier v. Dreger & McClellandgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Sherrill v. Stockelgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Jimenez v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Real Estate International, Inc. v. Buggaygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kitfield v. Henderson, Black & Greenegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hines v. Bell
green
2 sentences1970As was held in Young v. Kickliter, 213 Ga. 42 , supra; Chattanooga Publishing Co. v. Fulton, 215 Ga. 880 (3), supra; Mason v. Powell, 92 Ga. App. 496 , supra; Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 , supra; Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 , supra; Roe *387 buck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525 (2), supra; Lee v. Swann, 111 Ga. App. 88 , supra, and others, knowledge of the driver’s incompetency is an essential element of the rule which holds an owner liable for furnishing his motor vehicle to an incompetent driver, and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. 1969Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 (3b) ( 120 SE2d 892 ); Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525 ( 136 SE2d 399 ); Lee v. Swann, 111 Ga. App. 88 ( 140 SE2d 562 ); Saunders v. Vikers, 116 Ga. App. 733 ( 158 SE2d 324 ). | 4 | 1964–1970 |
Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins
green
2 sentences2012Again, in contravention of Lau's Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 , 405 S.E.2d 474 (1991), this Court refuses to consider the premises owner's right to summary judgment on the basis that there is an absence of evidence in the record to establish an essential element of the plaintiff's claim. 2012Again, in contravention of Lau's Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 , 405 S.E.2d 474 (1991), this Court refuses to consider the premises owner's right to summary judgment on the basis that there is an absence of evidence in the record to establish an essential element of the plaintiff's claim. | 3 | 2005–2012 |
Graham v. Cleveland
green
2 sentences1989See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 (200 *111 SE 184).’ Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ); NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. . . .” Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525, 526 (2) ( 136 SE2d 399 ). 1964See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 ( 200 SE 184 ).” Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ), NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive, Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 , supra, Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 (3b) ( 120 SE2d 892 ), disapproving language to the contrary in Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 , supra. “Constructive notice does not possess in its own essential nature the character assigned to it | 3 | 1961–1989 |
Lee v. Swann
neutral
2 sentences1970As was held in Young v. Kickliter, 213 Ga. 42 , supra; Chattanooga Publishing Co. v. Fulton, 215 Ga. 880 (3), supra; Mason v. Powell, 92 Ga. App. 496 , supra; Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 , supra; Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 , supra; Roe *387 buck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525 (2), supra; Lee v. Swann, 111 Ga. App. 88 , supra, and others, knowledge of the driver’s incompetency is an essential element of the rule which holds an owner liable for furnishing his motor vehicle to an incompetent driver, and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. 1969Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 (3b) ( 120 SE2d 892 ); Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525 ( 136 SE2d 399 ); Lee v. Swann, 111 Ga. App. 88 ( 140 SE2d 562 ); Saunders v. Vikers, 116 Ga. App. 733 ( 158 SE2d 324 ). | 3 | 1969–1970 |
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Legien
green
2 sentences1989See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 (200 *111 SE 184).’ Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ); NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. . . .” Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525, 526 (2) ( 136 SE2d 399 ). 1964See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 ( 200 SE 184 ).” Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ), NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive, Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 , supra, Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 (3b) ( 120 SE2d 892 ), disapproving language to the contrary in Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 , supra. “Constructive notice does not possess in its own essential nature the character assigned to it | 2 | 1964–1989 |
NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott
green
2 sentences1989See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 (200 *111 SE 184).’ Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ); NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive. . . .” Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525, 526 (2) ( 136 SE2d 399 ). 1964See Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 ( 15 SE2d 895 ); Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 ( 200 SE 184 ).” Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133, 139 ( 123 SE2d 412 ), NuGrape Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga. App. 539 (1) ( 171 SE 151 ); and such knowledge must be actual rather than constructive, Graham v. Cleveland, 58 Ga. App. 810 , supra, Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 (3b) ( 120 SE2d 892 ), disapproving language to the contrary in Holt v. Eastern Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 502, 508 , supra. “Constructive notice does not possess in its own essential nature the character assigned to it | 2 | 1964–1989 |
Saunders v. Vikers
green
2 sentences1969Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 (3b) ( 120 SE2d 892 ); Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525 ( 136 SE2d 399 ); Lee v. Swann, 111 Ga. App. 88 ( 140 SE2d 562 ); Saunders v. Vikers, 116 Ga. App. 733 ( 158 SE2d 324 ). 1969Hines v. Bell, 104 Ga. App. 76 (3b) ( 120 SE2d 892 ); Roebuck v. Payne, 109 Ga. App. 525 ( 136 SE2d 399 ); Lee v. Swann, 111 Ga. App. 88 ( 140 SE2d 562 ); Saunders v. Vikers, 116 Ga. App. 733 ( 158 SE2d 324 ). | 2 | 1969–1969 |
| Daniels v. Johnson green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Harmon v. Cunard green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Ajouelo v. Auto-Soler Co. green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Benham v. State green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Hicks v. McLain's Building Materials, Inc. green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Shepard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. neutral | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| Coffey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Scott Housing Systems, Inc. v. Hickox green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Parrish v. Ragsdale Realty Co. green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Management Search, Inc. v. Kinard green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| Chattanooga Pub. Co., Inc. v. Fulton green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Young v. Kickliter green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Mason v. Powell green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Harris v. Smith green | 1 | 1969–1969 |
| Bussey v. Bishop green | 1 | 1959–1959 |
| Zimmerman v. Harding green | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.