8 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1908–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sims v. Ins. Unlimited of West Monroegreen2 sentences2000Louisiana has a very simple rule: "Insurance policy exclusions are not valid unless clearly communicated to the insured.” Sims v. Insurance Unlimited of West Monroe, 669 So.2d 709, 711 (La.App.1996). 2000Louisiana has a very simple rule: "Insurance policy exclusions are not valid unless clearly communicated to the insured." Sims v. Insurance Unlimited of West Monroe, 669 So.2d 709, 711 (La.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
La. Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of Londongreen2 sentences2000"Notice of any exclusionary provisions is essential because the insured will otherwise assume the desired coverage exists.” Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 616 So.2d 1250, 1252 (1993). 2000"Notice of any exclusionary provisions is essential because the insured will otherwise assume the desired coverage exists." Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, 616 So.2d 1250, 1252 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Donald Plummer v. Springfield Terminal Railway Companygreen1 sentence1996Accordingly, the requested inquiry went to what the jurors were thinking when they chose the number that they did and whether their thinking was sound. 5 F.3d at 4 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Karl, 880 F.2d at 75 (concluding that district court wrongly relied on jury affidavits regarding jury’s deduction of plaintiffs liability from award stating that “[f]ar from a simple error in transmission or in putting words or figures to paper, it is the jurors’ mental processes that gave rise to the concerns at issue”). | 1 | 1 |
Betty Karl v. Burlington Northern Railroad Companygreen1 sentence1996Accordingly, the requested inquiry went to what the jurors were thinking when they chose the number that they did and whether their thinking was sound. 5 F.3d at 4 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Karl, 880 F.2d at 75 (concluding that district court wrongly relied on jury affidavits regarding jury’s deduction of plaintiffs liability from award stating that “[f]ar from a simple error in transmission or in putting words or figures to paper, it is the jurors’ mental processes that gave rise to the concerns at issue”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cowan v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences2007Quite simply, “[t]he court need merely inform the defendant in some fashion that the charge is, or may be, time-barred, and elicit a simple waiver of the bar.” Id. at 441 . 2007Quite simply, "[t]he court need merely inform the defendant in some fashion that the charge is, or may be, time-barred, and elicit a simple waiver of the bar." Id. at 441 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Bragg v. C. I. Whitten Transfer Co.
green
1 sentence1961For instance, in Bragg v. Whitten Transfer Co., 125 W. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Lange & Crist Box & Lumber Co. v. Haught
green
2 sentences1953If we had before us a simple exception of the timber, without specification of time for removal, and nothing more, it might be said that, under the rule announced in the cases above considered, the defendants had lost title thereto; * * *." In contrast is the agreement between the parties in Lange & Crist Box & Lumber Co., Inc., v. Haught, 132 W.Va. 530 , 52 S.E.2d 695, 696 , which provided that the purchaser would "log and remove all timber covered and conveyed by this deed on or before the 18th day of November, 1946", the deed having been executed on July 11, 1945. 1953If we had before us a simple exception of the timber, without specification of time for removal, and nothing more, it might be said that, under the rule announced in the cases above considered, the defendants had lost title thereto; * * *." In contrast is the agreement between the parties in Lange & Crist Box & Lumber Co., Inc., v. Haught, 132 W.Va. 530 , 52 S.E.2d 695, 696 , which provided that the purchaser would "log and remove all timber covered and conveyed by this deed on or before the 18th day of November, 1946", the deed having been executed on July 11, 1945. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Maier
neutral
1 sentence1950State v. Maier, 36 W. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
State v. Harrison
green
1 sentence1950Va. 729, 742 , et seq., 15 S. E. 982 , after an extended review of the decided cases, Judge Brannon rejects the doctrine of irresistible *125 impulse as a defense to crime, and ably maintains that the true and simple principle for determining the responsibility of a person for crime is: Did the accused at the. time of committing the crime know right from wrong? | 1 | 1950–1950 |
State v. Murphy
neutral
1 sentence1937State v. Murphy, 106 W. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
State v. Bowyer
neutral
1 sentence1908As said in Bowyers' Case, 43 W. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.