Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Kluggreen2 sentences2005In Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Klug , we stated that whether "an accident arises out of the use or maintenance of an automobile is a recurring question which defies a simple test." 415 N.W.2d 876, 877 (Minn.1987). 2005In Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Klug, we stated that whether “an accident arises out of the use or maintenance of an automobile is a recurring question which defies a simple test.” 415 N.W.2d 876, 877 (Minn.1987). | 3 | 4 |
Skillings v. Allengreen2 sentences1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). 1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). | 2 | 2 |
EARLE EX REL. EARLE v. Kuklogreen2 sentences1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). 1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). | 2 | 2 |
Kliegel v. Aitkengreen2 sentences1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). 1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Kelleygreen1 sentence2009Id. at 909, 911 . | 1 | 1 |
Jeanette Frocks, Inc. v. First Produce State Bankgreen2 sentences1974In dealing with a “fictitious payee” situation in Jeanette Frocks, Inc. v. First Produce State Bank, 272 Minn. 234, 242 , 137 N. W. 2d 205, 211 (1965), we said: “* * * The conduct of the bank under the circumstances is to be determined by the simple test of honesty and good faith and not by speculative claims of negligence or want of diligence. * * * “Mere negligence or want of diligence in failing to make inquiry is not sufficient to constitute want of good faith for purposes of qualifying as a holder in due course.” Aside from claims of negligence, defendant points to nothing in the record i 1974In dealing with a “fictitious payee” situation in Jeanette Frocks, Inc. v. First Produce State Bank, 272 Minn. 234, 242 , 137 N. W. 2d 205, 211 (1965), we said: “* * * The conduct of the bank under the circumstances is to be determined by the simple test of honesty and good faith and not by speculative claims of negligence or want of diligence. * * * “Mere negligence or want of diligence in failing to make inquiry is not sufficient to constitute want of good faith for purposes of qualifying as a holder in due course.” Aside from claims of negligence, defendant points to nothing in the record i | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cripps
green
2 sentences2017The supreme court determined that the request for identification was “more than a simple inquiry into [the defendant’s] identity, but a request “to prove . . . her innocence of the crime of underage consumption of alcohol.” Id. at 391 . 2017The supreme court held that the request constituted a seizure because “an objectively reasonable person would have believed that he or she was neither free to disregard the officer’s request nor free to terminate the encounter.” Id. | 2 | 1998–2017 |
Hendricks v. Butcher
green
2 sentences1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). 1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). | 2 | 1988–1988 |
Gilbert v. Hoffman
neutral
2 sentences1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). 1988See Skillings, 143 Minn. at 325-26 , 173 N.W. at 664 ; see also Earle v. Kuklo, 26 N.J.Super. 471 , 98 A.2d 107, 109 (1953) (tuberculosis); Hendricks v. Butcher, 144 Mo.App. 671 , 129 S.W. 431 (1910) (smallpox); Kliegel v. Aitken, 94 Wis. 432 , 69 N.W. 67, 68 (1896) (typhoid fever); Gilbert v. Hoffman, 66 Iowa 205 , 23 N.W. 632 (1885) (smallpox). | 2 | 1988–1988 |
Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences1989Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 393 U.S. 145, 149 , 89 S.Ct. 337, 339 , 21 L.Ed.2d 301 (1968). 1989Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 393 U.S. 145, 149 , 89 S.Ct. 337, 339 , 21 L.Ed.2d 301 (1968). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
City of Duluth v. Evans
green
2 sentences1984In City of Duluth v. Cerveny, 218 Minn. 511 , 16 N.W.2d 779 (1944), the Minnesota Supreme Court stated the simple rule: ‘A city ordinance, covering a subject also covered by a state law, is valid, if it is consistent with the state law and preserves the standard of regulation as moulded by such general law.’ Id. at 521 , 16 N.W.2d at 785 (quoting City of Duluth v. Evans, 158 Minn. 450 , 197 N.W. 737 (1924)). 1984In City of Duluth v. Cerveny, 218 Minn. 511 , 16 N.W.2d 779 (1944), the Minnesota Supreme Court stated the simple rule: ‘A city ordinance, covering a subject also covered by a state law, is valid, if it is consistent with the state law and preserves the standard of regulation as moulded by such general law.’ Id. at 521 , 16 N.W.2d at 785 (quoting City of Duluth v. Evans, 158 Minn. 450 , 197 N.W. 737 (1924)). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
City of Duluth v. Cerveny
green
2 sentences1984In City of Duluth v. Cerveny, 218 Minn. 511 , 16 N.W.2d 779 (1944), the Minnesota Supreme Court stated the simple rule: ‘A city ordinance, covering a subject also covered by a state law, is valid, if it is consistent with the state law and preserves the standard of regulation as moulded by such general law.’ Id. at 521 , 16 N.W.2d at 785 (quoting City of Duluth v. Evans, 158 Minn. 450 , 197 N.W. 737 (1924)). 1984In City of Duluth v. Cerveny, 218 Minn. 511 , 16 N.W.2d 779 (1944), the Minnesota Supreme Court stated the simple rule: ‘A city ordinance, covering a subject also covered by a state law, is valid, if it is consistent with the state law and preserves the standard of regulation as moulded by such general law.’ Id. at 521 , 16 N.W.2d at 785 (quoting City of Duluth v. Evans, 158 Minn. 450 , 197 N.W. 737 (1924)). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Credit Alliance Corp. v. Buffalo Linen Supply Co.
neutral
1 sentence1965As was said in Credit Alliance Corp. v. Buffalo Linen Supply Co. Inc. 238 App. Div. 18, 19 , 263 N. Y. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Susnik v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
green
2 sentences1964Co. 205 Minn. 325, 331 , 286 N. W. 249, 252 , we said: “* * * In denying validity for the two hypotheses for claimant, we have applied to opinion testimony, on which they were based, the simple rule that an affirmative finding cannot be sustained upon mere conjecture, as distinguished from real deduction. 1964Co. 205 Minn. 325, 331 , 286 N. W. 249, 252 , we said: “* * * In denying validity for the two hypotheses for claimant, we have applied to opinion testimony, on which they were based, the simple rule that an affirmative finding cannot be sustained upon mere conjecture, as distinguished from real deduction. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.