7 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wintergreen1 sentence2025“That balancing is highly discretionary,” State v. Winter, 162 Vt. 388, 399 (1994), and the court need not “specify the 2 Under Rule 609, a prior conviction that does not involve untruthfulness or falsification is admissible to attack the credibility of a witness if it was a felony conviction, occurred within the past fifteen years, and the court determines that its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect. | 1 | 1 |
Hamilton, Superintendent v. Verdowgreen2 sentences2002As noted in Hamilton v. Verdow, 287 Md. 544 , 414 A.2d 914, 925-26 (1980) (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted): However, material cannot always "easily be separated into fact finding and decision making categories." Moreover, some factual material is entitled to a degree of protection under the privilege, although not to the same extent as opinions and recommendations. 2002As noted in Hamilton v. Verdow, 287 Md. 544 , 414 A.2d 914, 925-26 (1980) (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted): However, material cannot always "easily be separated into fact finding and decision making categories." Moreover, some factual material is entitled to a degree of protection under the privilege, although not to the same extent as opinions and recommendations. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a Corporation
green
1 sentence2020As he was not under oath and the evidence was closed, the court cannot consider such an offhand statement. 15 necessary, be restrained.” Diapulse, 457 F.2d at 28 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In Re LA
green
2 sentences2016In re L.A., 2006 VT 118, ¶ 10 , 181 Vt. 34 , 912 A.2d 977 (emphasis added). 2016In re L.A., 2006 VT 118, ¶ 10 , 181 Vt. 34 , 912 A.2d 977 (emphasis added). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
In re L.A.
green
1 sentence2016In re L.A., 2006 VT 118, ¶ 10 , 181 Vt. 34 , 912 A.2d 977 (emphasis added). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Allen
green
1 sentence2012There is 2 In his cross-motion for summary judgment, Mr. Allen also contends that the sentencing judge was clearly prejudiced by the allegation of penetration because of: (1) the judge’s appearance and demeanor, and (2) the fact that the judge remanded Mr. Allen to custody even before the end of the hearing. 7 no basis for petitioner’s suggestion that the sentencing court was so offended by the penetration allegations that it ignored potentially mitigating evidence.3 As the Supreme Court noted, the sentencing court “adequately considered all of the relevant factors in this case.” Allen, 2010 V | 1 | 2012–2012 |
United States v. Salerno
green
2 sentences1993Salerno requires that pretrial detention be a "carefully limited exception." 481 U.S. at 755 , 107 S.Ct. at 2105 . 1993Salerno requires that pretrial detention be a "carefully limited exception." 481 U.S. at 755 , 107 S.Ct. at 2105 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Letourneau v. Citizens Utilities Company
green
2 sentences1977This procedure was recognized in Letourneau v. Citizens Utilities Co., *119 128 Vt. 129 , 259 A.2d 21 (1969). 1977This procedure was recognized in Letourneau v. Citizens Utilities Co., *119 128 Vt. 129 , 259 A.2d 21 (1969). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.