Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1936–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.green2 sentences2009See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613 , 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (holding an appellate court need not review remaining issues when its determination of a prior issue is dispositive of the appeal). 2009See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613 , 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (holding an appellate court need not review remaining issues when its determination of a prior issue is dispositive of the appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Otten v. Ottengreen2 sentences2004Rule 203(b)(1), SCACR, clearly states the time for serving the notice of appeal “shall run from receipt of written notice of entry of the order granting or denying [the timely post-trial motion].” The supreme court reiterated, “Under Rule 59(f), when such a motion is made, the time for appeal from the judgment begins to run from the time of the order granting or denying the motion.” Otten v. Otten , 287 S.C. 166, 167 , 337 S.E.2d 207, 208 (1985). 2004Rule 203(b)(1), SCACR, clearly states the time for serving the notice of appeal “shall run from receipt of written notice of entry of the order granting or denying [the timely post-trial motion].” The supreme court reiterated, “Under Rule 59(f), when such a motion is made, the time for appeal from the judgment begins to run from the time of the order granting or denying the motion.” Otten v. Otten , 287 S.C. 166, 167 , 337 S.E.2d 207, 208 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Elk & Jacobs Drywall v. Town Contractors, Inc.
green
2 sentences2023Our supreme court rejected this interpretation and held the clause did not "create[] a condition precedent but rather only postponed payment by [the general contractor] for a reasonable time so as to afford [it] an opportunity to obtain funds from the owner." Id. at 418 , 229 S.E.2d at 262 . 2023Our supreme court rejected this interpretation and held the clause did not "create[] a condition precedent but rather only postponed payment by [the general contractor] for a reasonable time so as to afford [it] an opportunity to obtain funds from the owner." Id. at 418 , 229 S.E.2d at 262 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Covell v. Heyman
green
2 sentences1951In Covell v. Heyman, 111 U. S. 176 , 4 S. Ct. 355, 358 , 28 L. 1951In Covell v. Heyman, 111 U. S. 176 , 4 S. Ct. 355, 358 , 28 L. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Sirgany v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
neutral
1 sentence1936Applying Rule 58 of the Circuit Court (this rule being also applicable to the Orangeburg County Court), and the interpretation of the rule as laid down in Addison v. Duncan, supra, Beckham v. Southern Railway Co., supra, and Sirgany v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, supra, upon a careful analysis of the pleadings in this case, the writer hereof is of the opinion that appellant was entitled to open and reply. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Addison v. Duncan
neutral
1 sentence1936Applying Rule 58 of the Circuit Court (this rule being also applicable to the Orangeburg County Court), and the interpretation of the rule as laid down in Addison v. Duncan, supra, Beckham v. Southern Railway Co., supra, and Sirgany v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, supra, upon a careful analysis of the pleadings in this case, the writer hereof is of the opinion that appellant was entitled to open and reply. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.