sound rule in Indiana

22 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1859–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
Horn v. Hendricksongreen indctapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015Horn v. Hendrickson, 824 N.E.2d 690, 695 (Ind.Ct.App.2005). [44] Moreover, the Indiana Supreme Court’s holding in Hancock Superi- or Couri is a sound rule.	1	1
Reynolds v. Stategreen ind · 1984 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1
Burnett v. Stategreen ind · 1981 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1
Wallace v. Stategreen ind · 1981 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1
Crowdus v. Stategreen ind · 1982 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1
Cabell v. Stategreen ind · 1984 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1
Alexander v. Stategreen ind · 1983 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1
Mellott v. Stategreen ind · 1986 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (39)

Case	Cited	Years
Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer green indctapp · 1939 2 sentences 1970Meeker, Guardian v. Decker (1938), 104 Ind. App. 594 , 10 N. E. (2d) 416; Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher (1938), 105 Ind. App. 558 , 12 N. E. (2d) 1005; Jay v. Holman (1939), 106 Ind. App. 413 , 20 N. E. (2d) 656; Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer (1939), 106 Ind. App. 613 , 21 N. E. (2d) 436.” At this point, we wish to commend the trial judge, and note that he was firmly in control of the proceedings at all times. 1942Meeker, Guardian v. Decker (1938), 104 Ind. App. 594 , 10 N. E. (2d) 416; Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher (1938), 105 Ind. App. 558 , 12 N. E. (2d) 1005; Jay v. Holman (1939), 106 Ind. App. 413 ; 20 N. E. (2d) 656; Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer (1939), 106 Ind. App. 613 , 21 N. E. (2d) 436.	2	1942–1970
Jay v. Holman green indctapp · 1939 2 sentences 1970Meeker, Guardian v. Decker (1938), 104 Ind. App. 594 , 10 N. E. (2d) 416; Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher (1938), 105 Ind. App. 558 , 12 N. E. (2d) 1005; Jay v. Holman (1939), 106 Ind. App. 413 , 20 N. E. (2d) 656; Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer (1939), 106 Ind. App. 613 , 21 N. E. (2d) 436.” At this point, we wish to commend the trial judge, and note that he was firmly in control of the proceedings at all times. 1942Meeker, Guardian v. Decker (1938), 104 Ind. App. 594 , 10 N. E. (2d) 416; Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher (1938), 105 Ind. App. 558 , 12 N. E. (2d) 1005; Jay v. Holman (1939), 106 Ind. App. 413 ; 20 N. E. (2d) 656; Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer (1939), 106 Ind. App. 613 , 21 N. E. (2d) 436.	2	1942–1970
Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher neutral indctapp · 1938 2 sentences 1970Meeker, Guardian v. Decker (1938), 104 Ind. App. 594 , 10 N. E. (2d) 416; Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher (1938), 105 Ind. App. 558 , 12 N. E. (2d) 1005; Jay v. Holman (1939), 106 Ind. App. 413 , 20 N. E. (2d) 656; Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer (1939), 106 Ind. App. 613 , 21 N. E. (2d) 436.” At this point, we wish to commend the trial judge, and note that he was firmly in control of the proceedings at all times. 1942Meeker, Guardian v. Decker (1938), 104 Ind. App. 594 , 10 N. E. (2d) 416; Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher (1938), 105 Ind. App. 558 , 12 N. E. (2d) 1005; Jay v. Holman (1939), 106 Ind. App. 413 ; 20 N. E. (2d) 656; Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer (1939), 106 Ind. App. 613 , 21 N. E. (2d) 436.	2	1942–1970
Meeker, Guardian v. Decker green indctapp · 1937 2 sentences 1970Meeker, Guardian v. Decker (1938), 104 Ind. App. 594 , 10 N. E. (2d) 416; Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher (1938), 105 Ind. App. 558 , 12 N. E. (2d) 1005; Jay v. Holman (1939), 106 Ind. App. 413 , 20 N. E. (2d) 656; Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer (1939), 106 Ind. App. 613 , 21 N. E. (2d) 436.” At this point, we wish to commend the trial judge, and note that he was firmly in control of the proceedings at all times. 1942Meeker, Guardian v. Decker (1938), 104 Ind. App. 594 , 10 N. E. (2d) 416; Richmond Insurance Co. v. Boetticher (1938), 105 Ind. App. 558 , 12 N. E. (2d) 1005; Jay v. Holman (1939), 106 Ind. App. 413 ; 20 N. E. (2d) 656; Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. Elischer (1939), 106 Ind. App. 613 , 21 N. E. (2d) 436.	2	1942–1970
Harrison v. State green indctapp · 1991 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1996–1996
Cornett v. State green ind · 1982 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1996–1996
Mosley v. State neutral indctapp · 1996 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1996–1996
Lewis v. State green ind · 1981 2 sentences 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . .	1	1996–1996
Cavendish v. State green ind · 1986 1 sentence 1996We recommend that this instruction be given to the jury in all trials." Lewis, 424 N.E.2d at 111 . [7] See, e.g., Cavendish v. State, 496 N.E.2d 46 (Ind.1986); Mellott v. State, 496 N.E.2d 396, 399 (Ind.1986); Cabell v. State, 461 N.E.2d 1101, 1102 (Ind.1984); Reynolds v. State, 460 N.E.2d 506, 508 (Ind.1984); Alexander v. State, 449 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.1983); Cornett v. State, 436 N.E.2d 765 , 766 (Ind.1982); Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796, 798 (Ind.1982); Wallace v. State, 426 N.E.2d 34, 36-37 (Ind.1981); Burnett v. State, 426 N.E.2d 1314, 1315 (Ind.1981); Mosley v. State, 660 N.E.2d 58	1	1996–1996
Billman v. Hensel green indctapp · 1979 2 sentences 1991Id. at 274-75 , 391 N.E.2d at 673 . 1991Id. at 274-75 , 391 N.E.2d at 673 .	1	1991–1991
House v. Hanson green minn · 1955 2 sentences 1985Wright, Handbook of the Law of Federal Courts, See. 79, at 347 (2d ed. 1970), quoting from House v. Hanson (1955), 245 Minn. 466, 470 , 72 N.W.2d 874, 877 ), failure to comply with TR. 13(A) bars the assertion of the counterclaim in a subsequent action between the parties. 1985Wright, Handbook of the Law of Federal Courts, See. 79, at 347 (2d ed. 1970), quoting from House v. Hanson (1955), 245 Minn. 466, 470 , 72 N.W.2d 874, 877 ), failure to comply with TR. 13(A) bars the assertion of the counterclaim in a subsequent action between the parties.	1	1985–1985
Batchelder v. Haxby green indctapp · 1975 2 sentences 1981In Batchelder, Judge Garrard examined this sound rule, observing that its justification lies in the very purpose of the notice requirement, namely, to enable the governmental body to inquire into the occurrence “in the context that one is claiming municipal liability for injury.” 167 Ind.App. at 85 , 337 N.E.2d at 890 . 1981In Batchelder, Judge Garrard examined this sound rule, observing that its justification lies in the very purpose of the notice requirement, namely, to enable the governmental body to inquire into the occurrence “in the context that one is claiming municipal liability for injury.” 167 Ind.App. at 85 , 337 N.E.2d at 890 .	1	1981–1981
Gulf Oil Corporation v. American Louisiana Pipe Line Company green ca6 · 1960 1 sentence 1979See 5 Williston On Contracts (3rd Ed.) § 677, p. 224; Gulf Oil Corp. v. American Louisiana Pipeline Co. (6th Cir. 1960), 282 F.2d 401 .	1	1979–1979
Chatard v. O'Donovan green ind · 1881 1 sentence 1974It seems to be a sound rule and should be applied in this case.” (Id. at 315.) Whether on the rationale of Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. Temperly, supra ( 159 Ind. 651 ) and Chatard, Bishop v. O’ Donovan, supra ( 80 Ind. 20 ) or of §§ 315 and 317, Restatement 2d Torts, quoted ante, owners were using apartment No. 2 in a manner which created an unreasonable risk of injury to McDade.	1	1974–1974
Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. Temperly green ind · 1902 1 sentence 1974It seems to be a sound rule and should be applied in this case.” (Id. at 315.) Whether on the rationale of Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. Temperly, supra ( 159 Ind. 651 ) and Chatard, Bishop v. O’ Donovan, supra ( 80 Ind. 20 ) or of §§ 315 and 317, Restatement 2d Torts, quoted ante, owners were using apartment No. 2 in a manner which created an unreasonable risk of injury to McDade.	1	1974–1974
Thompson v. Norton green ind · 1860 2 sentences 1951Law Dic., supra.' See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N.E. 176 ." I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case. 1951Law Dic., supra.’ See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N. E. 176 .” I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case.	1	1951–1951
Caldwell v. Bank of Salem neutral ind · 1863 2 sentences 1951Law Dic., supra.' See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N.E. 176 ." I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case. 1951Law Dic., supra.’ See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N. E. 176 .” I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case.	1	1951–1951
Broker v. Scobey neutral ind · 1877 2 sentences 1951Law Dic., supra.' See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N.E. 176 ." I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case. 1951Law Dic., supra.’ See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N. E. 176 .” I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case.	1	1951–1951
Wiseman v. Beckwith neutral · 1883 2 sentences 1951Law Dic., supra.' See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N.E. 176 ." I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case. 1951Law Dic., supra.’ See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N. E. 176 .” I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case.	1	1951–1951
Webster v. Major green indctapp · 1904 2 sentences 1951Law Dic., supra.’ See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N. E. 176 .” I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case. 1951Law Dic., supra.’ See also, Wiseman v. Beckwith (1883), 90 Ind. 185, 190 ; Thompson v. Norton (1860), 14 Ind. 187 ; Broker v. Scobey (1877), 56 Ind. 588, 593 ; Caldwell v. Bank of Salem (1860), 20 Ind. 294, 296 ; Webster v. Major (1904), 33 Ind. App. 202, 213 , 71 N. E. 176 .” I take it, therefore, that this must be accepted as the sound doctrine to be applied to the facts in this case.	1	1951–1951
State ex rel. Harkness v. Gleason green ind · 1918 2 sentences 1945We should get back to the sound rule of State ex rel. v. Gleason (1918), 187 Ind. 297 , 119 N. E. 9 . 1945We should get back to the sound rule of State ex rel. v. Gleason (1918), 187 Ind. 297 , 119 N. E. 9 .	1	1945–1945
Carey v. Gundlefinger neutral indctapp · 1895 1 sentence 1913The case of Carey v. Gundlefinger (1895), 12 Ind. App. 645 , 40 N. E. 312 , is in its facts almost identical with the ease at bar.	1	1913–1913
Norton v. Shelby County green scotus · 1886	1	1908–1908
Richardson's v. Green green scotus · 1890	1	1903–1903
Newsom v. Board of Commissioners green ind · 1885	1	1903–1903
Parks v. Satterthwaite green ind · 1892	1	1903–1903
Jones v. Henderson neutral ind · 1898	1	1903–1903
Raymond v. Simonson green ind · 1835	1	1898–1898
Woodbury v. Woodbury green mass · 1886	1	1895–1895
M'Cormick v. Malin green ind · 1841	1	1895–1895
Ikerd v. Beavers green ind · 1886	1	1895–1895
Ewing v. Wilson green ind · 1892	1	1895–1895
Smith v. Calloway neutral ind · 1844	1	1885–1885
Musselman v. Kent green ind · 1870	1	1885–1885
Ephraims v. Murdock neutral ind · 1843	1	1882–1882
Wilson v. Brumfield neutral ind · 1846	1	1882–1882
Ross v. Thompson green ind · 1881	1	1881–1881
Foust v. Moorman neutral ind · 1850	1	1864–1864
Borden v. Fitch green · 1818	1	1859–1859

Where else courts name it

GA 125 (1891–2025) NY 110 (1826–2023) TX 106 (1899–2026) PA 87 (1834–2026) CA 86 (1886–2023) TN 70 (1874–2021) AL 68 (1857–2014) IL 57 (1870–2025) NJ 53 (1828–2026) SC 44 (1942–2026) MA 42 (1892–2026) LA 42 (1882–2024) MI 41 (1884–2026) FL 37 (1881–2013) KY 35 (1865–2023) MO 32 (1870–1994) NC 29 (1896–2018) OH 28 (1849–2026) OK 28 (1898–2016) WA 25 (1914–2018) IA 24 (1887–2023) NE 24 (1890–2023) MD 22 (1853–2024) IN 22 (1859–2015) HI 21 (1889–2025) AR 21 (1872–1990) AZ 19 (1931–1999) MS 18 (1855–2019) KS 16 (1911–2022) DC 14 (1894–2016) UT 14 (1943–2025) WI 14 (1867–2016) CT 13 (1839–1994) CO 13 (1875–2002) WV 13 (1925–1995) WY 11 (1933–2003) DE 11 (1913–2022) ME 10 (1830–1987) MT 10 (1912–2023) SD 10 (1907–1968) ID 10 (1914–2014) MN 10 (1901–2026) VA 9 (1878–1994) NM 9 (1881–1994) ND 8 (1908–1967) RI 8 (1868–1972) VT 7 (1849–2015) PR 7 (1904–1970) NV 6 (1925–1994) OR 5 (1945–1983) NH 3 (1836–1978)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check