20 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schmerber v. Californiagreen2 sentences2020See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770-71 (holding the warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect was valid because the law enforcement officer, dealing with a car accident, could "reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant, under the circumstances, threatened 'the destruction of evidence'"); McNeely, 569 U.S. at 165 (holding the determination of whether a warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect qualifies as an exigent circumstance involves a case-by-case analysis of the totality of the circumstances and that the natural dissipation 2020See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770-71 (holding the warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect was valid because the law enforcement officer, dealing with a car accident, could "reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant, under the circumstances, threatened 'the destruction of evidence'"); McNeely, 569 U.S. at 165 (holding the determination of whether a warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect qualifies as an exigent circumstance involves a case-by-case analysis of the totality of the circumstances and that the natural dissipation | 3 | 3 |
Missouri v. McNeelygreen2 sentences2020See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770-71 (holding the warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect was valid because the law enforcement officer, dealing with a car accident, could "reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant, under the circumstances, threatened 'the destruction of evidence'"); McNeely, 569 U.S. at 165 (holding the determination of whether a warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect qualifies as an exigent circumstance involves a case-by-case analysis of the totality of the circumstances and that the natural dissipation 2020See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770-71 (holding the warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect was valid because the law enforcement officer, dealing with a car accident, could "reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant, under the circumstances, threatened 'the destruction of evidence'"); McNeely, 569 U.S. at 165 (holding the determination of whether a warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect qualifies as an exigent circumstance involves a case-by-case analysis of the totality of the circumstances and that the natural dissipation | 3 | 3 |
Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernardgreen2 sentences2020See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770-71 (holding the warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect was valid because the law enforcement officer, dealing with a car accident, could "reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant, under the circumstances, threatened 'the destruction of evidence'"); McNeely, 569 U.S. at 165 (holding the determination of whether a warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect qualifies as an exigent circumstance involves a case-by-case analysis of the totality of the circumstances and that the natural dissipation 2020See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770-71 (holding the warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect was valid because the law enforcement officer, dealing with a car accident, could "reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant, under the circumstances, threatened 'the destruction of evidence'"); McNeely, 569 U.S. at 165 (holding the determination of whether a warrantless blood draw of a DUI suspect qualifies as an exigent circumstance involves a case-by-case analysis of the totality of the circumstances and that the natural dissipation | 3 | 3 |
State v. Gatesgreen2 sentences1984Shaw, supra, while approving the standards set out in Chapman, supra, for evaluating whether a Doyle violation is reversible error, holds that the determination must be made on a case-by-case analysis, citing Davis, supra. Our Court has held that testimony concerning a defendant’s refusal to give a statement to an officer, if error, would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where defendant’s “uncorroborated version of his part in the robbery was obviously incredible and the jury understandably did not believe him.” State v. Gates, supra 269 S. C. at 561, 238 S. E. (2d) 680 . 1984Shaw, supra, while approving the standards set out in Chapman, supra, for evaluating whether a Doyle violation is reversible error, holds that the determination must be made on a case-by-case analysis, citing Davis, supra. Our Court has held that testimony concerning a defendant’s refusal to give a statement to an officer, if error, would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where defendant’s “uncorroborated version of his part in the robbery was obviously incredible and the jury understandably did not believe him.” State v. Gates, supra 269 S. C. at 561, 238 S. E. (2d) 680 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Dostergreen2 sentences2019See Doster , 276 S.C. at 651 , 284 S.E.2d at 220 ("The public policy protecting confidential communications must be balanced against the public interest in the proper administration of justice." (emphasis added)). *715 Third, some jurisdictions take a middle-ground approach and find the answer depends on a case-by-case analysis of the facts. 7 This is the general approach we adopt when determining if the attorney-client privilege has been waived in a tort action against an insurer for bad faith refusal to deny coverage. 2019See Doster , 276 S.C. at 651 , 284 S.E.2d at 220 ("The public policy protecting confidential communications must be balanced against the public interest in the proper administration of justice." (emphasis added)). *715 Third, some jurisdictions take a middle-ground approach and find the answer depends on a case-by-case analysis of the facts. 7 This is the general approach we adopt when determining if the attorney-client privilege has been waived in a tort action against an insurer for bad faith refusal to deny coverage. | 1 | 1 |
Milliken & Co. v. South Carolina Employment Security Commissiongreen2 sentences2013Comm'n, 315 S.C. 492, 497 , 445 S.E.2d 640, 644 (Ct. App. 1994), rev'd on other grounds, 321 S.C. 349 , 468 S.E.2d 638 (1996) ("[T]he question of whether conduct is connected with work necessitates a case by case analysis."). 4. 2013Comm'n, 315 S.C. 492, 497 , 445 S.E.2d 640, 644 (Ct. App. 1994), rev'd on other grounds, 321 S.C. 349 , 468 S.E.2d 638 (1996) ("[T]he question of whether conduct is connected with work necessitates a case by case analysis."). 4. | 1 | 1 |
Milliken & Co. v. South Carolina Employment Security Commissiongreen2 sentences2013Comm'n, 315 S.C. 492, 497 , 445 S.E.2d 640, 644 (Ct. App. 1994), rev'd on other grounds, 321 S.C. 349 , 468 S.E.2d 638 (1996) ("[T]he question of whether conduct is connected with work necessitates a case by case analysis."). 4. 2013Comm'n, 315 S.C. 492, 497 , 445 S.E.2d 640, 644 (Ct. App. 1994), rev'd on other grounds, 321 S.C. 349 , 468 S.E.2d 638 (1996) ("[T]he question of whether conduct is connected with work necessitates a case by case analysis."). 4. | 1 | 1 |
Lloyd v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See, e.g., Lloyd v. State, 258 Ga. 645 , 373 S.E.2d 1, 3 (1988) (finding defendant was not prejudiced by counsel’s deficient performance, and stating “[w]e prefer to examine the facts of each case and grant relief where there is at least an inference from the evidence that the defendant would have accepted the offer as made or something similar”); Hanzelka v. State, 682 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Tex. Ct.App.1984) (“This Court has concluded further that counsel’s *613 deficient performance prejudiced Hanzelka in that under the terms of the plea bargain he would not have served any time in jail.”). 2009See, e.g., Lloyd v. State, 258 Ga. 645 , 373 S.E.2d 1, 3 (1988) (finding defendant was not prejudiced by counsel’s deficient performance, and stating “[w]e prefer to examine the facts of each case and grant relief where there is at least an inference from the evidence that the defendant would have accepted the offer as made or something similar”); Hanzelka v. State, 682 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Tex. Ct.App.1984) (“This Court has concluded further that counsel’s *613 deficient performance prejudiced Hanzelka in that under the terms of the plea bargain he would not have served any time in jail.”). | 1 | 1 |
Hanzelka v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See, e.g., Lloyd v. State, 258 Ga. 645 , 373 S.E.2d 1, 3 (1988) (finding defendant was not prejudiced by counsel’s deficient performance, and stating “[w]e prefer to examine the facts of each case and grant relief where there is at least an inference from the evidence that the defendant would have accepted the offer as made or something similar”); Hanzelka v. State, 682 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Tex. Ct.App.1984) (“This Court has concluded further that counsel’s *613 deficient performance prejudiced Hanzelka in that under the terms of the plea bargain he would not have served any time in jail.”). | 1 | 1 |
In re the Marriage of Cargillgreen1 sentence2001See generally Love, supra, at 289; In re Marriage of Cargill, 843 P.2d 1335, 1341 (Colo.1993); Peters v. Peters, 214 N.W.2d 151, 157 (Iowa 1974). | 1 | 1 |
Peters v. Petersgreen2 sentences2001See generally Love, supra, at 289; In re Marriage of Cargill, 843 P.2d 1335, 1341 (Colo.1993); Peters v. Peters, 214 N.W.2d 151, 157 (Iowa 1974). 2001Fry, 85 Cal.Rptr. at 128 ; Peters, 214 N.W.2d at 156 ; Richards, 353 A.2d at 144 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. Wisconsin
green
2 sentences2020In Mitchell, the United States Supreme Court held the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement "almost always" justifies the warrantless drawing of blood from unconscious DUI suspects. 139 S. Ct. at 2531 . 2020In Mitchell, the United States Supreme Court held the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement "almost always" justifies the warrantless drawing of blood from unconscious DUI suspects. 139 S. Ct. at 2531 . | 3 | 2020–2020 |
Fickett v. Superior Court of Pima County
green
2 sentences2019In Fickett v. Superior Court of Pima County , 27 Ariz.App. 793 , 558 P.2d 988 (1976), another case we relied on in Fabian , the court similarly recognized the factors **163 are for use in a specific case-by-case analysis, 558 P.2d at 990 , and in particular in cases in which a person's liability to the beneficiary of an estate is in question, 558 P.2d at 989 -90 . 2019In Fickett v. Superior Court of Pima County , 27 Ariz.App. 793 , 558 P.2d 988 (1976), another case we relied on in Fabian , the court similarly recognized the factors **163 are for use in a specific case-by-case analysis, 558 P.2d at 990 , and in particular in cases in which a person's liability to the beneficiary of an estate is in question, 558 P.2d at 989 -90 . | 3 | 2018–2019 |
State v. Powers
green
2 sentences2005The Court of Appeals of Washington, in State v. Powers, 124 Wash.App. 92 , 99 P.3d 1262 (2004), rejected a bright line rule that all 911 recordings are nontestimonial, opting instead to employ a case-by-case analysis into whether statements contained on a 911 recording originated from interrogation. 2005The Court of Appeals of Washington, in State v. Powers , 99 P.3d 1262 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004), rejected a bright line rule that all 911 recordings are nontestimonial, opting instead to employ a case-by-case analysis into whether statements contained on a 911 recording originated from interrogation. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Moore v. Moore
green
2 sentences2020"The rebuttable presumption standard requires a case by case analysis." Moore, 300 S.C. at 80 , 386 S.E.2d at 458 . 2020"The rebuttable presumption standard requires a case by case analysis." Moore, 300 S.C. at 80 , 386 S.E.2d at 458 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In Re Kunstler.
green
1 sentence2018The party seeking sanctions may avoid such problems by notifying his opponent and the court of his intention to pursue sanctions at the earliest possible date." Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Wickham v. Equity Fire & Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences2010Instead, the court held that “the determination of whether the policy definition of ‘occupying’ is satisfied should be left to a case-by-case analysis, depending on the circumstances of the accident, the use of the vehicle, the relevant terms of the coverage at issue, and any underlying public policy considerations.” Id. 2010Therefore, the court found a man who was struck by another car while fixing the tire on a car was “occupying” the vehicle. 10 Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Kiriakides v. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006Code Ann. § 33-14-300 310 (2006) (delineating grounds and procedures for judicial dissolution of a corporation); Kiriakides v. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. , 343 S.C. 587 , 541 S.E.2d 257 (2001) (articulating that the definition of oppression is best left to judicial construction based on a case-by-case analysis of the fact-specific circumstances in each case). 2006Code Ann. § 33-14-300 310 (2006) (delineating grounds and procedures for judicial dissolution of a corporation); Kiriakides v. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. , 343 S.C. 587 , 541 S.E.2d 257 (2001) (articulating that the definition of oppression is best left to judicial construction based on a case-by-case analysis of the fact-specific circumstances in each case). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Powers
green
1 sentence2005The Court of Appeals of Washington, in State v. Powers, 124 Wash.App. 92 , 99 P.3d 1262 (2004), rejected a bright line rule that all 911 recordings are nontestimonial, opting instead to employ a case-by-case analysis into whether statements contained on a 911 recording originated from interrogation. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Peirson v. Calhoun
green
2 sentences2001Splawn, 311 S.C. at 425 , 429 S.E.2d at 807 ; Peirson v. Calhoun, 308 S.C. 246 , 417 S.E.2d 604 (Ct.App.1992). 2001Splawn, 311 S.C. at 425 , 429 S.E.2d at 807 ; Peirson v. Calhoun, 308 S.C. 246 , 417 S.E.2d 604 (Ct.App.1992). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Fry v. Fry
green
1 sentence2001Fry, 85 Cal.Rptr. at 128 ; Peters, 214 N.W.2d at 156 ; Richards, 353 A.2d at 144 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Richards v. Richards
green
1 sentence2001Fry, 85 Cal.Rptr. at 128 ; Peters, 214 N.W.2d at 156 ; Richards, 353 A.2d at 144 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Splawn v. Splawn
green
2 sentences2001Splawn, 311 S.C. at 425 , 429 S.E.2d at 807 ; Peirson v. Calhoun, 308 S.C. 246 , 417 S.E.2d 604 (Ct.App.1992). 2001Splawn, 311 S.C. at 425 , 429 S.E.2d at 807 ; Peirson v. Calhoun, 308 S.C. 246 , 417 S.E.2d 604 (Ct.App.1992). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State in Interest of KAW
green
2 sentences1991State In Interest of K.A.W., 104 N.J. 112 , 515 A. (2d) 1217 (1986); People v. Morris, 61 N.Y. (2d) 290, 473 N.Y.S. (2d) 769, 461 N.E. (2d) 1256 (1984). 1991State In Interest of K.A.W. , 104 N.J. 112 , 515 A. (2d) 1217 (1986); People v. Morris , 61 N.Y. (2d) 290, 473 N.Y.S. (2d) 769, 461 N.E. (2d) 1256 (1984). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State Ex Rel. McLeod v. McInnis
green
1 sentence1987Case-by-case analysis is necessary because “there is tolerated in complex areas of government of necessity from time to time some overlap of authority and some encroachment to a limited degree.” Id. at 313, 295 S. E. (2d) at 636 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.