7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Urserygreen1 sentence2019Id. at 622 n.14; see United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267, 287 (1996) (noting that Austin’s approach is “wholly distinct from” a case- by-case analysis). | 1 | 1 |
Charles W. Cooper v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2016In 1971, the Seventh Circuit held that “[i]n certain instances, the critical date [for the statute of limitations] is the point at which the injury becomes ap parent.” Cooper v. U.S., 442 F.2d 908, 911 (7th Cir.1971) (emphasis added). 2016In 1971, the Seventh Circuit held that “[i]n certain instances, the critical date [for the statute of limitations] is the point at which the injury becomes apparent.” Cooper v. U.S., 442 F.2d 908, 911 (7th Cir. 1971) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Lucas v. U.S. Bank, N.A.green2 sentences2011Id. at 244. 2011Id. at 244. | 1 | 1 |
O'CONNOR v. Stategreen2 sentences2004Recently, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Sullivan and Chief Justice Shepard also rejected the Halper "rationally related" analysis in their dissent from a denial of a petition to transfer, see State v. Klein, 719 N.E.2d 386 (Ind.1999), as did another panel of this Court in O'Connor v. State, 789 N.E.2d 504, 509-10 (Ind.Ct.App.2003), trans. denied. 2004Recently, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Sullivan and Chief Justice Shepard also rejected the Halper "rationally related" analysis in their dissent from a denial of a petition to transfer, see State v. Klein, 719 N.E.2d 386 (Ind.1999), as did another panel of this Court in O'Connor v. State, 789 N.E.2d 504, 509-10 (Ind.Ct.App.2003), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dilullo v. Joseph
green
1 sentence2014The court recognized that under traditional rules of insurance law.and contract law, “a tenant is not considered a coinsured on his landlord’s fire policy simply because he has an *390 insurable interest in the premises and pays rent,” and “whether subrogation would apply would ordinarily depend, in large part, on a case-by-case analysis of the language of the insurance policies and leases involved.” Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rohde
green
1 sentence2014RAM, 820 N.W.2d at 15 -16 (citing Rausch, 882 A.2d at 814 .) Such evidence could include, among other things, the types of insurance purchased by each party as evidence of each party’s expectations with respect to its responsibility for particular losses. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Rausch v. Allstate Insurance
green
1 sentence2014RAM, 820 N.W.2d at 15 -16 (citing Rausch, 882 A.2d at 814 .) Such evidence could include, among other things, the types of insurance purchased by each party as evidence of each party’s expectations with respect to its responsibility for particular losses. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Klein
green
2 sentences2004Recently, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Sullivan and Chief Justice Shepard also rejected the Halper "rationally related" analysis in their dissent from a denial of a petition to transfer, see State v. Klein, 719 N.E.2d 386 (Ind.1999), as did another panel of this Court in O'Connor v. State, 789 N.E.2d 504, 509-10 (Ind.Ct.App.2003), trans. denied. 2004Recently, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Sullivan and Chief Justice Shepard also rejected the Halper "rationally related" analysis in their dissent from a denial of a petition to transfer, see State v. Klein, 719 N.E.2d 386 (Ind.1999), as did another panel of this Court in O'Connor v. State, 789 N.E.2d 504, 509-10 (Ind.Ct.App.2003), trans. denied. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Holbrook v. Flynn
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 569 , 106 S.Ct. 1340 . 2003Id. at 569 , 106 S.Ct. 1340 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Cox v. Cox
green
2 sentences1993In Cox v. Cox (1991), Ind.App., 580 N.E.2d 344 , trans. denied, a majority of the court agreed that a 56-44 split amounting to a deviation from equality in excess of $25,-000.00 was substantial. 3 A case-by-case analysis of mere percentage disparity is not determinative. 1993In Cox, id., Judge Hoffman stated that a 56-44 division was insubstantial in a marital estate worth in excess of $400,000.00. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.