Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
34 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2026 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Nampa v. Swaynegreen2 sentences1993In regard to similar questions involving the theory of equitable estoppel, 5 this Court has rejected the adoption of rigid standards, relying rather on a case by case analysis, City of Nampa v. Swayne, 97 Idaho 530, 534 , 547 P.2d 1135, 1139 (1976); Dalton Highway Dist. of Kootenai County v. Sowder, 88 Idaho 556, 562 , 401 P.2d 813, 815-16 (1965), and we think that policy is prudent here. 5 Waiver arising out of conduct is in the nature of estoppel. 1993In regard to similar questions involving the theory of equitable estoppel, 5 this Court has rejected the adoption of rigid standards, relying rather on a case by case analysis, City of Nampa v. Swayne, 97 Idaho 530, 534 , 547 P.2d 1135, 1139 (1976); Dalton Highway Dist. of Kootenai County v. Sowder, 88 Idaho 556, 562 , 401 P.2d 813, 815-16 (1965), and we think that policy is prudent here. 5 Waiver arising out of conduct is in the nature of estoppel. | 3 | 4 |
Bessemer Trust Co., N.A. v. Braningreen2 sentences2025Bessemer Trust Co., N.A. v. Branin, 949 N.E.2d 462, 469 (N.Y. 2011). 2025Bessemer Trust Co., N.A. v. Branin, 949 N.E.2d 462, 469 (N.Y. 2011). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Cronicgreen2 sentences2021See Cronic, supra, at 658-659, 104 S.Ct. 2039 ; see also Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 91 , 96 S.Ct. 1330 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 344-345, 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). 2021See Cronic, supra, at 658-659, 104 S.Ct. 2039 ; see also Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 91 , 96 S.Ct. 1330 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 344-345, 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). | 2 | 2 |
Geders v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2021See Cronic, supra, at 658-659, 104 S.Ct. 2039 ; see also Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 91 , 96 S.Ct. 1330 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 344-345, 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). 2021See Cronic, supra, at 658-659, 104 S.Ct. 2039 ; see also Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 91 , 96 S.Ct. 1330 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 344-345, 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). | 2 | 2 |
Williams Lake Lands, Inc. v. LeMoyne Development, Inc.green2 sentences2011Accord Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc., 137 Idaho 352, 357 , 48 P.3d 1241, 1246 (2002) (noting quasiestoppel is a broadly remedial doctrine, often applied ad hoc to specific fact patterns); Williams Lake Lands, Inc. v. LeMoyne Dev., Inc., 108 Idaho 826, 830 , 702 P.2d 864, 868 (Ct.App.1985) ("Because quasi-estoppel is an equitable doctrine, its application depends upon a case by case analysis of the equities involved, rather than upon precise definitional standards.”). 2011Accord Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc., 137 Idaho 352, 357 , 48 P.3d 1241, 1246 (2002) (noting quasiestoppel is a broadly remedial doctrine, often applied ad hoc to specific fact patterns); Williams Lake Lands, Inc. v. LeMoyne Dev., Inc., 108 Idaho 826, 830 , 702 P.2d 864, 868 (Ct.App.1985) ("Because quasi-estoppel is an equitable doctrine, its application depends upon a case by case analysis of the equities involved, rather than upon precise definitional standards.”). | 2 | 2 |
Dalton Highway Dist. of Kootenai County v. Sowdergreen2 sentences1993In regard to similar questions involving the theory of equitable estoppel, 5 this Court has rejected the adoption of rigid standards, relying rather on a case by case analysis, City of Nampa v. Swayne, 97 Idaho 530, 534 , 547 P.2d 1135, 1139 (1976); Dalton Highway Dist. of Kootenai County v. Sowder, 88 Idaho 556, 562 , 401 P.2d 813, 815-16 (1965), and we think that policy is prudent here. 5 Waiver arising out of conduct is in the nature of estoppel. 1993In regard to similar questions involving the theory of equitable estoppel, 5 this Court has rejected the adoption of rigid standards, relying rather on a case by case analysis, City of Nampa v. Swayne, 97 Idaho 530, 534 , 547 P.2d 1135, 1139 (1976); Dalton Highway Dist. of Kootenai County v. Sowder, 88 Idaho 556, 562 , 401 P.2d 813, 815-16 (1965), and we think that policy is prudent here. 5 Waiver arising out of conduct is in the nature of estoppel. | 1 | 3 |
Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.green2 sentences2026Though the Supreme Court recognized a “presumption that an indigent litigant has a right to appointed counsel only when, if he loses, he may be deprived of his physical liberty,” id. at 26– 27, it held that the presumption may be overcome or rebutted when there are sufficiently weighty due process concerns, id. at 31 . 2026Instead, the Supreme Court held 8 that “the decision whether due process calls for the appointment of counsel for indigent parents in termination proceedings” involves a case-by-case inquiry that is “to be answered in the first instance by the trial court, subject, of course, to appellate review.” Id. at 31-32. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Muracogreen2 sentences2012State v. Muraco, 132 Idaho 130, 133 , 968 P.2d 225, 228 (1998). 2012State v. Muraco, 132 Idaho 130, 133 , 968 P.2d 225, 228 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc.green2 sentences2011Accord Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc., 137 Idaho 352, 357 , 48 P.3d 1241, 1246 (2002) (noting quasiestoppel is a broadly remedial doctrine, often applied ad hoc to specific fact patterns); Williams Lake Lands, Inc. v. LeMoyne Dev., Inc., 108 Idaho 826, 830 , 702 P.2d 864, 868 (Ct.App.1985) ("Because quasi-estoppel is an equitable doctrine, its application depends upon a case by case analysis of the equities involved, rather than upon precise definitional standards.”). 2011Accord Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc., 137 Idaho 352, 357 , 48 P.3d 1241, 1246 (2002) (noting quasiestoppel is a broadly remedial doctrine, often applied ad hoc to specific fact patterns); Williams Lake Lands, Inc. v. LeMoyne Dev., Inc., 108 Idaho 826, 830 , 702 P.2d 864, 868 (Ct.App.1985) ("Because quasi-estoppel is an equitable doctrine, its application depends upon a case by case analysis of the equities involved, rather than upon precise definitional standards.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lindsaygreen2 sentences2011We note that under Idaho law, the case-by-case analysis of Gagnon is inapplicable because our legislature has created an unequivocal statutory right to counsel that applies at “all stages of the matter beginning with the earliest time when a person providing his own counsel would be entitled to be represented by an attorney and including revocation of probation.” State v. Lindsay, 124 Idaho 825, 828 , 864 P.2d 663, 666 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Idaho Code § 19 - 852). 2011We note that under Idaho law, the case-by-case analysis of Gagnon is inapplicable because our legislature has created an unequivocal statutory right to counsel that applies at “all stages of the matter beginning with the earliest time when a person providing his own counsel would be entitled to be represented by an attorney and including revocation of probation.” State v. Lindsay, 124 Idaho 825, 828 , 864 P.2d 663, 666 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Idaho Code § 19 - 852). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Hackettgreen2 sentences2010This Court has said that “the admission of evidence of an alleged victim’s past sexual behavior is constitutionally required only in extraordinary circumstances.” State v. Peite, 122 Idaho 809, 815 , 839 P.2d 1223, 1229 (Ct.App.1992) (citing Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 47-48 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Williams, 21 Ohio St.3d 33 , 487 N.E.2d 560 (1986); People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338 , 365 N.W.2d 120, 128 (1984)). 2010This Court has said that “the admission of evidence of an alleged victim’s past sexual behavior is constitutionally required only in extraordinary circumstances.” State v. Peite, 122 Idaho 809, 815 , 839 P.2d 1223, 1229 (Ct.App.1992) (citing Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 47-48 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Williams, 21 Ohio St.3d 33 , 487 N.E.2d 560 (1986); People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338 , 365 N.W.2d 120, 128 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
Doe v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2010This Court has said that "the admission of evidence of an alleged victim's past sexual behavior is constitutionally required only in extraordinary circumstances." State v. Peite, 122 Idaho 809, 815 , 839 P.2d 1223, 1229 (Ct.App.1992) (citing Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 47-48 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Williams, 21 Ohio St.3d 33 , 487 N.E.2d 560 (1986); People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338 , 365 N.W.2d 120, 128 (1984)). 2010This Court has said that “the admission of evidence of an alleged victim’s past sexual behavior is constitutionally required only in extraordinary circumstances.” State v. Peite, 122 Idaho 809, 815 , 839 P.2d 1223, 1229 (Ct.App.1992) (citing Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 47-48 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Williams, 21 Ohio St.3d 33 , 487 N.E.2d 560 (1986); People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338 , 365 N.W.2d 120, 128 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Peitegreen2 sentences2010This Court has said that “the admission of evidence of an alleged victim’s past sexual behavior is constitutionally required only in extraordinary circumstances.” State v. Peite, 122 Idaho 809, 815 , 839 P.2d 1223, 1229 (Ct.App.1992) (citing Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 47-48 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Williams, 21 Ohio St.3d 33 , 487 N.E.2d 560 (1986); People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338 , 365 N.W.2d 120, 128 (1984)). 2010This Court has said that “the admission of evidence of an alleged victim’s past sexual behavior is constitutionally required only in extraordinary circumstances.” State v. Peite, 122 Idaho 809, 815 , 839 P.2d 1223, 1229 (Ct.App.1992) (citing Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 47-48 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Williams, 21 Ohio St.3d 33 , 487 N.E.2d 560 (1986); People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338 , 365 N.W.2d 120, 128 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pittgreen2 sentences2007See also People v. Daniels, 52 Cal.3d 815 , 277 Cal.Rptr. 122 , 802 P.2d 906, 915 (1991) (noting that automatic disqualification would hamper the ability of the public defender to represent indigents in criminal cases); State v. Pitt, 77 Hawaii 374 , 884 P.2d 1150, 1156 (App.1994) (applying a case-by-case analysis because a public defender’s office, as a government office, is different from a law firm). 2007See also People v. Daniels, 52 Cal.3d 815 , 277 Cal.Rptr. 122 , 802 P.2d 906, 915 (1991) (noting that automatic disqualification would hamper the ability of the public defender to represent indigents in criminal cases); State v. Pitt, 77 Hawaii 374 , 884 P.2d 1150, 1156 (App.1994) (applying a case-by-case analysis because a public defender’s office, as a government office, is different from a law firm). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Danielsgreen2 sentences2007See also People v. Daniels, 52 Cal.3d 815 , 277 Cal.Rptr. 122 , 802 P.2d 906, 915 (1991) (noting that automatic disqualification would hamper the ability of the public defender to represent indigents in criminal cases); State v. Pitt, 77 Hawaii 374 , 884 P.2d 1150, 1156 (App.1994) (applying a case-by-case analysis because a public defender’s office, as a government office, is different from a law firm). 2007See also People v. Daniels, 52 Cal.3d 815 , 277 Cal.Rptr. 122 , 802 P.2d 906, 915 (1991) (noting that automatic disqualification would hamper the ability of the public defender to represent indigents in criminal cases); State v. Pitt, 77 Hawaii 374 , 884 P.2d 1150, 1156 (App.1994) (applying a case-by-case analysis because a public defender’s office, as a government office, is different from a law firm). | 1 | 1 |
Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. v. Udomgreen1 sentence2005Clinic, 166 S.W.3d at 685 (Holder, J., dissenting) (calling for a case-by-case analysis of the enforceability of non-compete provisions between physicians). | 1 | 1 |
KTVB, INC. v. Boise Citygreen2 sentences2002See Williams Lake Lands, Inc. v. LeMoyne Dev., Inc., 108 Idaho 826, 830 , 702 P.2d 864, 868 (1985) (“Because quasi-estoppel is an equitable doctrine, its application depends upon a case by case analysis of the equities involved, rather than upon precise definitional standards.”); KTVB, Inc., 94 Idaho at 282 , 486 P.2d at 995 (“[T]he essence of the proper application of the doctrine of quasi estoppel is the focus of the Court’s attention upon the specific facts and circumstances of the ease at bar.”). 2002See Williams Lake Lands, Inc. v. LeMoyne Dev., Inc., 108 Idaho 826, 830 , 702 P.2d 864, 868 (1985) (“Because quasi-estoppel is an equitable doctrine, its application depends upon a case by case analysis of the equities involved, rather than upon precise definitional standards.”); KTVB, Inc., 94 Idaho at 282 , 486 P.2d at 995 (“[T]he essence of the proper application of the doctrine of quasi estoppel is the focus of the Court’s attention upon the specific facts and circumstances of the ease at bar.”). | 1 | 1 |
Empire Lumber Co. v. Washington Water Power Co.green2 sentences1996Empire Lumber Co. v. Washington Water Power Co., 114 Idaho 191, 192 , 755 P.2d 1229, 1230 (1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988). 1996Empire Lumber Co. v. Washington Water Power Co., 114 Idaho 191, 192 , 755 P.2d 1229, 1230 (1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
Idaho Bank of Commerce v. Chastaingreen2 sentences1993Idaho Bank of Commerce v. Chastain, 86 Idaho 146, 154 , 383 P.2d 849, 853-84 (1963). 1993Idaho Bank of Commerce v. Chastain, 86 Idaho 146, 154 , 383 P.2d 849, 853-84 (1963). | 1 | 1 |
| Zelenka v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Riley v. City of Chestergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Sandstromgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Sielgreen | 1 | 1 |
| William T. Farr v. Peter J. Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles Countygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Charboneau v. State
green
2 sentences2022Id. 2021Id. | 8 | 2015–2022 |
Gideon v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences2021See Cronic, supra, at 658-659, 104 S.Ct. 2039 ; see also Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 91 , 96 S.Ct. 1330 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 344-345, 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). 2021See Cronic, supra, at 658-659, 104 S.Ct. 2039 ; see also Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 91 , 96 S.Ct. 1330 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 344-345, 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Grist
green
1 sentence2026Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. Evans
green
2 sentences2023However, we 36 determined it was time to “partially abandon” the case-by-case approach as it provided “no neutral criteria” to reach a decision and “could give the appearance of result-oriented decision making.” Id. 2023Instead, we had used a case-by-case analysis of the nature of a right at issue, and had “stated in dicta that voting, procreation, and constitutional safeguards for persons accused of crimes are fundamental rights under the state constitution.” Id. (emphasis in original). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences2010This Court has said that “the admission of evidence of an alleged victim’s past sexual behavior is constitutionally required only in extraordinary circumstances.” State v. Peite, 122 Idaho 809, 815 , 839 P.2d 1223, 1229 (Ct.App.1992) (citing Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 47-48 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Williams, 21 Ohio St.3d 33 , 487 N.E.2d 560 (1986); People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338 , 365 N.W.2d 120, 128 (1984)). 2010This Court has said that “the admission of evidence of an alleged victim’s past sexual behavior is constitutionally required only in extraordinary circumstances.” State v. Peite, 122 Idaho 809, 815 , 839 P.2d 1223, 1229 (Ct.App.1992) (citing Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 47-48 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Williams, 21 Ohio St.3d 33 , 487 N.E.2d 560 (1986); People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338 , 365 N.W.2d 120, 128 (1984)). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Asch v. State
green
2 sentences2007Bolin, 137 P.3d at 145 ; Asch, 62 P.3d at 953 . 2007Similarly, in Bolin v. State, 137 P.3d 136 (Wyo.2006) and Asch v. State, 62 P.3d 945 (Wyo.2003), the court held that in the context of an alleged conflict of interest based on representation of co-defendants by separate attorneys from the public defender’s office, a case-by-case inquiry, rather than per se disqualification, was appropriate. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Bell
green
2 sentences2007In State v. Bell, 90 N.J. 163 , 447 A.2d 525 (1982), co-defendants were both represented by the public defender’s office, but the court held that the potential for conflict that exists in representation by members of a private firm does not exist with multiple representation by public defenders. 2007In State v. Bell, 90 N.J. 163 , 447 A.2d 525 (1982), co-defendants were both represented by the public defender’s office, but the court held that the potential for conflict that exists in representation by members of a private firm does not exist with multiple representation by public defenders. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Bolin v. State
green
2 sentences2007Bolin, 137 P.3d at 145 ; Asch, 62 P.3d at 953 . 2007Similarly, in Bolin v. State, 137 P.3d 136 (Wyo.2006) and Asch v. State, 62 P.3d 945 (Wyo.2003), the court held that in the context of an alleged conflict of interest based on representation of co-defendants by separate attorneys from the public defender’s office, a case-by-case inquiry, rather than per se disqualification, was appropriate. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Richards v. Wisconsin
green
2 sentences2005Id. at 392-94 , 117 S.Ct. at 1420-21 , 137 L.Ed.2d at 623-24 . 2005Id. at 392-94 , 117 S.Ct. at 1420-21 , 137 L.Ed.2d at 623-24 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Broadrick v. Oklahoma
red
2 sentences2003In Broadrick , the Supreme Court observed that where conduct is involved, the over-breadth of a statute must be both real and substantial when judged in relation to its legitimate sweep, and whatever problems exist should be cured in a particular case by case analysis of the fact situation to which the statute’s sanctions, assuredly, may not be applied. 413 U.S. at 614-15 , 93 S.Ct. at 2917-18 , 37 L.Ed.2d at 841 ^42. 2003In Broadrick , the Supreme Court observed that where conduct is involved, the over-breadth of a statute must be both real and substantial when judged in relation to its legitimate sweep, and whatever problems exist should be cured in a particular case by case analysis of the fact situation to which the statute’s sanctions, assuredly, may not be applied. 413 U.S. at 614-15 , 93 S.Ct. at 2917-18 , 37 L.Ed.2d at 841 ^42. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Empire Lumber Co. v. Washington Water Power Co.
neutral
2 sentences1996Empire Lumber Co. v. Washington Water Power Co., 114 Idaho 191, 192 , 755 P.2d 1229, 1230 (1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988). 1996Empire Lumber Co. v. Washington Water Power Co., 114 Idaho 191, 192 , 755 P.2d 1229, 1230 (1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| State v. Paz red | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas House of Representatives green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State Ex Rel. Barker v. Manchin green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Opinion of the Justices green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Satterwhite v. Texas green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Gadsden County Times, Inc. v. Horne green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Mathews v. Jimenez green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Rogers v. Lough green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Mathews v. Eldridge green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| State v. Mitchell green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| People v. Rosales green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.