14 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Clay v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Clay v. State, 318 Ark. 122 , 883 S.W.2d 822 (1994). 2010See Clay v. State, 318 Ark. 122 , 883 S.W.2d 822 (1994). | 1 | 2 |
Wofford v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See Wofford v. State, 330 Ark. 8 , 952 S.W.2d 646 (1997). 2006See Wofford v. State, 330 Ark. 8 , 952 S.W.2d 646 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
Colorado v. Connellygreen1 sentence1989Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 168 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Wainwright v. Sykesgreen1 sentence1980The Supreme Court reversed, saying broadly that “the Constitution does not require a voluntariness hearing absent some contemporaneous challenge to the use of the confession.” Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 86 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Otis v. State
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2010Id. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Benbo
green
2 sentences1998As was stated well in State v. Benbo, 174 Mont. 252 , 570 P.2d 894 (1977) ]: Under [the voluntariness standard] the statutory requirement of an initial appearance without unnecessary delay after an arrest is practically meaningless. 1998As was stated well in State v. Benbo, 174 Mont. 252 , 570 P.2d 894 (1977) ]: Under [the voluntariness standard] the statutory requirement of an initial appearance without unnecessary delay after an arrest is practically meaningless. | 2 | 1987–1998 |
Mauppin v. State
green
1 sentence2005Clay, 318 Ark. at 129 (citing Mauppin v. State, 309 Ark. 235 , 831 S.W.2d 102 (1992)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Conner v. State
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Worth v. City of Rogers
green
2 sentences2001The Arkansas Supreme Court most recently reaffirmed its adherence to the voluntariness doctrine in Worth v. City of Rogers, 341 Ark. 12 , 14 S.W.3d 471 (2000). 2001The Arkansas Supreme Court most recently reaffirmed its adherence to the voluntariness doctrine in Worth v. City of Rogers, 341 Ark. 12 , 14 S.W.3d 471 (2000). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Duncan v. State
green
2 sentences1997Duncan v. State, 291 Ark. at 529 , 726 S.W.2d at 657 . 1997“As we have said, assurance of voluntariness is not the only concern. . . . [I]f exclusion under [Rule 8.1] rests on a voluntariness standard, we are again faced with a swearing-match the rule was designed to avoid.” Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Hileman v. State
green
2 sentences1990Bucy v. State, 271 Ark. 768 , 610 S.W.2d 576 (1981) (citing Hileman v. State, 259 Ark. 567 , 535 S.W.2d 56 (1976)). *700 A factor to be considered in determining the voluntariness of a waiver of the right to remain silent is the advice or lack of advice of constitutional rights. 1990Bucy v. State, 271 Ark. 768 , 610 S.W.2d 576 (1981) (citing Hileman v. State, 259 Ark. 567 , 535 S.W.2d 56 (1976)). *700 A factor to be considered in determining the voluntariness of a waiver of the right to remain silent is the advice or lack of advice of constitutional rights. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Bucy v. State
neutral
2 sentences1990Bucy v. State, 271 Ark. 768 , 610 S.W.2d 576 (1981) (citing Hileman v. State, 259 Ark. 567 , 535 S.W.2d 56 (1976)). *700 A factor to be considered in determining the voluntariness of a waiver of the right to remain silent is the advice or lack of advice of constitutional rights. 1990Bucy v. State, 271 Ark. 768 , 610 S.W.2d 576 (1981) (citing Hileman v. State, 259 Ark. 567 , 535 S.W.2d 56 (1976)). *700 A factor to be considered in determining the voluntariness of a waiver of the right to remain silent is the advice or lack of advice of constitutional rights. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Harvey v. State
green
2 sentences1990Hatley v. State, 289 Ark. 130 , 709 S.W.2d 812 (1986); Harvey v. State, 272 Ark. 19 , 611 S.W.2d 762 (1981). 1990Hatley v. State, 289 Ark. 130 , 709 S.W.2d 812 (1986); Harvey v. State, 272 Ark. 19 , 611 S.W.2d 762 (1981). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Hatley v. State
green
2 sentences1990Hatley v. State, 289 Ark. 130 , 709 S.W.2d 812 (1986); Harvey v. State, 272 Ark. 19 , 611 S.W.2d 762 (1981). 1990Hatley v. State, 289 Ark. 130 , 709 S.W.2d 812 (1986); Harvey v. State, 272 Ark. 19 , 611 S.W.2d 762 (1981). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Sims v. Georgia
green
1 sentence1989Appellant also argues that the trial court erred by making an express finding only as to the voluntariness of the waiver and by failing to make a clear finding on the voluntariness of the confession, citing Simms v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 538 (1967). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Heintze
green
1 sentence1987Commonwealth v. Davenport, supra; People v. Heintze, supra; State v. Benbo, supra; see generally, 28 A.L.R. 4th 1121 , supra, § 4, § 5. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Commonwealth v. Davenport
red
1 sentence1987Commonwealth v. Davenport, supra; People v. Heintze, supra; State v. Benbo, supra; see generally, 28 A.L.R. 4th 1121 , supra, § 4, § 5. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Douglas v. State
neutral
2 sentences1986Douglas v. State, 286 Ark. 296 , 692 S.W.2d 217 (1985). 1986Douglas v. State, 286 Ark. 296 , 692 S.W.2d 217 (1985). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.