Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. John Deere Waterloo Tractor Worksgreen2 sentences2016Brown v. John Deere Waterloo Tractor Works, 423 N.W.2d 193, 194 (Iowa 1988); see also Horsfield, 834 N.W.2d at 462 (parenthetically citing Brown for the proposition that “substantial compliance is a fact-specific inquiry depending on whether ‘the purpose of the statute is shown to have been served’ ”). it is undisputed the City is subject to the requirements of chapter 22. 2013See Brown v. John Deere Waterloo Tractor Works, 423 N.W.2d 193, 194 (Iowa 1988) (indicating that substantial compliance is a fact-specific inquiry depending on whether “the purpose of the statute is shown to have been served” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hallgreen2 sentences2007Thus, the “relevant factors will vary from case to case and each case must be individually considered on the particular facts and circumstances presented with due regard for the purposes sought to be served by the exclusionary rule.” Id.; see State v. Hall, 839 Or. 7, 115 P.3d 908, 926 (2005) (noting “a fact-specific inquiry into the totality of the circumstances” is necessary); Hansen, 63 P.3d at 665-66 (noting the relevance of all facts, and that the three factors articulated in Brown are of particular relevance); Hight, 781 A.2d at 14 (finding the three Broum factors simply instructive); se 2007Thus, the “relevant factors will vary from case to case and each case must be individually considered on the particular facts and circumstances presented with due regard for the purposes sought to be served by the exclusionary rule.” Id.; see State v. Hall, 115 P.3d 908, 926 (Or. 2005) (noting “a fact-specific inquiry into the totality of the circumstances” is necessary); Hansen, 63 P.3d at 665–66 (noting the relevance of all facts, and that the three factors articulated in Brown are of particular relevance); Hight, 781 A.2d at 14 (finding the three Brown factors simply instructive); see also | 2 | 2 |
Horsfield Materials, Inc. v. City of Dyersvillegreen1 sentence2016Brown v. John Deere Waterloo Tractor Works, 423 N.W.2d 193, 194 (Iowa 1988); see also Horsfield, 834 N.W.2d at 462 (parenthetically citing Brown for the proposition that “substantial compliance is a fact-specific inquiry depending on whether ‘the purpose of the statute is shown to have been served’ ”). it is undisputed the City is subject to the requirements of chapter 22. | 1 | 1 |
Cedar Rapids Community School District and EMC Insurance Companies v. Christine Peasegreen1 sentence2016Dist. v. Pease, 807 N.W.2d 839, 852 (Iowa 2011) (second alteration in original) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hightgreen1 sentence2007Thus, the “relevant factors will vary from case to case and each case must be individually considered on the particular facts and circumstances presented with due regard for the purposes sought to be served by the exclusionary rule.” Id.; see State v. Hall, 115 P.3d 908, 926 (Or. 2005) (noting “a fact-specific inquiry into the totality of the circumstances” is necessary); Hansen, 63 P.3d at 665–66 (noting the relevance of all facts, and that the three factors articulated in Brown are of particular relevance); Hight, 781 A.2d at 14 (finding the three Brown factors simply instructive); see also | 1 | 1 |
State v. Webbgreen2 sentences2005See id. at 76-79 (discussing history of inferences supporting constructive possession). 2005See id. at 76-79 (discussing history of inferences supporting constructive possession). | 1 | 1 |
Dillinger v. City of Sioux Citygreen1 sentence2000See Dillinger v. City of Sioux City, 368 N.W.2d 176, 182 (Iowa 1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Lane
green
2 sentences2016The court declined, however, to find that a lineup would always cause the right to counsel to vest—rather, whether the right to counsel could attach would be a fact-specific inquiry into whether the role of the government had transformed “from fact-finder to adversary.” Id. 2016The court declined, however, to find that a lineup would always cause the right to counsel to vest — rather, whether the right to counsel could attach would be a fact-specific inquiry into whether the role of the government had transformed “from fact-finder to adversary.” Id. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
Costello v. Costello
green
1 sentence2023Id. at 673 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re the Marriage of Steven Michael Gust and Linda Leann Gust Upon the Petition of Steven Michael Gust
green
1 sentence2021See Iowa Code § 598 .21A(1) (2018); Gust, 858 N.W.2d at 407 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Swartzendruber v. Schimmel
green
1 sentence2015However, the determination “of the question of what constitutes recognition of the seriousness of an injury or disease is a fact specific inquiry.” Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Hansen
green
1 sentence2007Thus, the “relevant factors will vary from case to case and each case must be individually considered on the particular facts and circumstances presented with due regard for the purposes sought to be served by the exclusionary rule.” Id.; see State v. Hall, 115 P.3d 908, 926 (Or. 2005) (noting “a fact-specific inquiry into the totality of the circumstances” is necessary); Hansen, 63 P.3d at 665–66 (noting the relevance of all facts, and that the three factors articulated in Brown are of particular relevance); Hight, 781 A.2d at 14 (finding the three Brown factors simply instructive); see also | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.