11 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gaithergreen2 sentences2017See State v. Gaither, 283 Kan. 671, 684-85 , 156 P.3d 602 (2007). 2017See State v. Gaither, 283 Kan. 671, 684-85 , 156 P.3d 602 (2007). | 2 | 2 |
Ernest Eugene Harper v. Leroy L. Young Attorney General of Oklahomagreen1 sentence2020See Harper v. Young, 64 F.3d 563, 564-65 (10th Cir. 1995) (recognizing that applying Sandin "is a question of no small difficulty"), aff'd 520 U.S. 143 , 117 S. Ct. 1148 , 137 L. | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Harpergreen2 sentences2020See Harper v. Young, 64 F.3d 563, 564-65 (10th Cir. 1995) (recognizing that applying Sandin "is a question of no small difficulty"), aff'd 520 U.S. 143 , 117 S. Ct. 1148 , 137 L. 2020See Harper v. Young, 64 F.3d 563, 564-65 (10th Cir. 1995) (recognizing that applying Sandin "is a question of no small difficulty"), aff'd 520 U.S. 143 , 117 S. Ct. 1148 , 137 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hollandgreen2 sentences2000App. 2d 317, 319-320 , 721 P.2d 290 (1986); see also State v. Holland, 236 Kan. 840 , 696 P.2d 401 (1985) (declining jurisdiction where resolution of issue would merely succeed in repeating the principles set forth in earlier cases), and a review of the merits of the contempt ruling would entail a fact-specific analysis not appropriate for review as a question reserved. 2000App. 2d 317, 319-320 , 721 P.2d 290 (1986); see also State v. Holland, 236 Kan. 840 , 696 P.2d 401 (1985) (declining jurisdiction where resolution of issue would merely succeed in repeating the principles set forth in earlier cases), and a review of the merits of the contempt ruling would entail a fact-specific analysis not appropriate for review as a question reserved. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Chittendengreen2 sentences2000See State v. Chittenden, 212 Kan. 178 , 510 P.2d 152 (1973). 2000See State v. Chittenden, 212 Kan. 178 , 510 P.2d 152 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pfannenstiel
green
2 sentences2025Pfannenstiel, 302 Kan. at 758 . 2025Pfannenstiel, 302 Kan. at 758 . | 2 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Meeks
green
1 sentence2025Meeks, 307 Kan. at 820 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Smith-Parker
green
2 sentences2020State v. Smith-Parker, 301 Kan. 132, 156 , 340 P.3d 485 (2014). 2020State v. Smith-Parker, 301 Kan. 132, 156 , 340 P.3d 485 (2014). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Hurd
green
1 sentence2020"Whether one of the conditions is satisfied is a fact-specific inquiry, and we review the district court's factual findings for substantial competent evidence and the legal conclusion that one of the conditions is met de novo." 298 Kan. at 561 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Arizona v. Washington
green
2 sentences2019And "it is manifest that the key word 'necessity' cannot be interpreted literally; instead, contrary to the teaching of Webster, we assume that there are degrees of necessity and we require a 'high degree' before concluding that a mistrial is appropriate." 434 U.S. at 506 , 98 S.Ct. 824 . 2019And "it is manifest that the key word 'necessity' cannot be interpreted literally; instead, contrary to the teaching of Webster, we assume that there are degrees of necessity and we require a 'high degree' before concluding that a mistrial is appropriate." 434 U.S. at 506 , 98 S.Ct. 824 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Draper v. United States
green
2 sentences2009Officers' decisions as to whether reasonable suspicion exists, like the more stringent standard of probable cause, are "`not technical; they are the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act.' [Citation omitted.]" Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307, 313 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959). 2009Officers' decisions as to whether reasonable suspicion exists, like the more stringent standard of probable cause, are "`not technical; they are the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act.' [Citation omitted.]" Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307, 313 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Johnson v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2000App. 2d 317, 319-320 , 721 P.2d 290 (1986); see also State v. Holland, 236 Kan. 840 , 696 P.2d 401 (1985) (declining jurisdiction where resolution of issue would merely succeed in repeating the principles set forth in earlier cases), and a review of the merits of the contempt ruling would entail a fact-specific analysis not appropriate for review as a question reserved. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.