detailed analysis in Nebraska

2007However, in Pony Lake School District 30 v. State Committee for the Reorganization of School Districts, 271 Neb. 173 , 710 N.W.2d 609 (2006), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2058 (May 15, 2006), the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of LB 126 in the face of multiple constitutional challenges to that legislation by its opponents.

2007However, in Pony Lake School District 30 v. State Committee for the Reorganization of School Districts, 271 Neb. 173 , 710 N.W.2d 609 (2006), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2058 (May 15, 2006), the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of LB 126 in the face of multiple constitutional challenges to that legislation by its opponents.

2006In State v. Zarate, 264 Neb. 690, 694 , 651 N.W.2d 215, 221 (2002), the court detailed the defense counsel’s obligation in the plea agreement process as follows: “Where, as here, a defendant is represented by counsel during the plea process and enters his plea upon the advice of counsel, the voluntariness of the plea depends on whether counsel’s advice ‘was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.’ ” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 56 , 106 S. Ct. 366 , 88 L.

2006In State v. Zarate, 264 Neb. 690, 694 , 651 N.W.2d 215, 221 (2002), the court detailed the defense counsel’s obligation in the plea agreement process as follows: “Where, as here, a defendant is represented by counsel during the plea process and enters his plea upon the advice of counsel, the voluntariness of the plea depends on whether counsel’s advice ‘was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.’ ” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 56 , 106 S. Ct. 366 , 88 L.

2006Ed. 2d 203 (1985), quoting McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 , 90 S. Ct. 1441 , 25 L.

2006Ed. 2d 203 (1985), quoting McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 , 90 S. Ct. 1441 , 25 L.

2003We agree. *627 In State v. Washington, ante p. 598, 658 N.W.2d 302 (2003), we provided a detailed analysis of the requirements of § 28-321.

1996Co., 444 A.2d 329, 336-37 (Me. 1982), the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine provided a detailed analysis of the need for the legal causation prong of the test: Absent the content provided by “legal cause,” the causation requirement . . . would allow compensation for any disability that could be shown as a matter of medical or physical fact to have occurred because of the effect of ordinary activity upon a pre-existing condition during the course of employment.

1996Co., 444 A.2d 329, 336-37 (Me. 1982), the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine provided a detailed analysis of the need for the legal causation prong of the test: Absent the content provided by "legal cause," the causation requirement ... would allow compensation for any disability that could be shown as a matter of medical or physical fact to have occurred because of the effect of ordinary activity upon a pre-existing condition during the course of employment.

1995One of the most complete discussions of the law of auctions is found in Pitchfork Ranch Co. v. Bar TL, 615 P.2d 541 (Wyo. 1980), and we rely extensively on the detailed analysis of the Wyoming court.

1991Corp. v. Kirk, 231 Neb. 557 , 437 N.W.2d 453 (1989). *892 (b) Explanation The remaining portion of this assignment of error, that the trial court erred in refusing to allow Kruger, as the author, to explain the letter’s contents, requires a more detailed analysis.

1991Corp. v. Kirk, 231 Neb. 557 , 437 N.W.2d 453 (1989). *892 (b) Explanation The remaining portion of this assignment of error, that the trial court erred in refusing to allow Kruger, as the author, to explain the letter’s contents, requires a more detailed analysis.

1988This court, in In re Interest of Blythman, 208 Neb. 51 , 302 N.W.2d 666 (1981), provided a detailed analysis of the issue of “dangerousness.” We there said: For there to be compliance with the fourteenth amendment’s due process clause, there must be an independent finding of dangerousness____ The key to confinement of one who is mentally ill lies in the finding that he is dangerous, i.e., that absent confinement, he is likely to engage in particular acts which will result in substantial harm to himself or others.

1988This court, in In re Interest of Blythman, 208 Neb. 51 , 302 N.W.2d 666 (1981), provided a detailed analysis of the issue of “dangerousness.” We there said: For there to be compliance with the fourteenth amendment’s due process clause, there must be an independent finding of dangerousness____ The key to confinement of one who is mentally ill lies in the finding that he is dangerous, i.e., that absent confinement, he is likely to engage in particular acts which will result in substantial harm to himself or others.

1897The act just referred to, as we have already stated, was an act complete in itself upon the subject of courts, and the provision for the appointment of a stenographic reporter was just as germane as was the requirement that there should be elected a clerk or appointed a bailiff, and, as shown by the above cases, it was proper that the compensation of such reporter should be fixed by the provisions of the act providing for his appointment.' It has already been noted that the effect of the enactment of the general statute in question, in 1879, was to repeal the special provisions of the act of 1