12 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rosenthalgreen2 sentences2021In this Court’s history, we have relied on Article 16 only twice: in State v. Rosenthal, 75 Vt. 295, 297 , 55 A. 610, 610 (1903) and State v. Duranleau, 128 Vt. 206, 210 , 260 A.2d 383, 386 (1969), superseded by rule on other grounds, V.R.A.P. 5(b), as recognized in State v. Carpenter, 138 Vt. 140, 145 , 412 A.2d 285, 289 (1980).12 Neither case includes a detailed analysis of Article 16. 2021In this Court’s history, we have relied on Article 16 only twice: in State v. Rosenthal, 75 Vt. 295, 297 , 55 A. 610, 610 (1903) and State v. Duranleau, 128 Vt. 206, 210 , 260 A.2d 383, 386 (1969), superseded by rule on other grounds, V.R.A.P. 5(b), as recognized in State v. Carpenter, 138 Vt. 140, 145 , 412 A.2d 285, 289 (1980).12 Neither case includes a detailed analysis of Article 16. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Carpentergreen2 sentences2021In this Court’s history, we have relied on Article 16 only twice: in State v. Rosenthal, 75 Vt. 295, 297 , 55 A. 610, 610 (1903) and State v. Duranleau, 128 Vt. 206, 210 , 260 A.2d 383, 386 (1969), superseded by rule on other grounds, V.R.A.P. 5(b), as recognized in State v. Carpenter, 138 Vt. 140, 145 , 412 A.2d 285, 289 (1980).12 Neither case includes a detailed analysis of Article 16. 2021In this Court’s history, we have relied on Article 16 only twice: in State v. Rosenthal, 75 Vt. 295, 297 , 55 A. 610, 610 (1903) and State v. Duranleau, 128 Vt. 206, 210 , 260 A.2d 383, 386 (1969), superseded by rule on other grounds, V.R.A.P. 5(b), as recognized in State v. Carpenter, 138 Vt. 140, 145 , 412 A.2d 285, 289 (1980).12 Neither case includes a detailed analysis of Article 16. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Duranleaugreen2 sentences2021In this Court’s history, we have relied on Article 16 only twice: in State v. Rosenthal, 75 Vt. 295, 297 , 55 A. 610, 610 (1903) and State v. Duranleau, 128 Vt. 206, 210 , 260 A.2d 383, 386 (1969), superseded by rule on other grounds, V.R.A.P. 5(b), as recognized in State v. Carpenter, 138 Vt. 140, 145 , 412 A.2d 285, 289 (1980).12 Neither case includes a detailed analysis of Article 16. 2021In this Court’s history, we have relied on Article 16 only twice: in State v. Rosenthal, 75 Vt. 295, 297 , 55 A. 610, 610 (1903) and State v. Duranleau, 128 Vt. 206, 210 , 260 A.2d 383, 386 (1969), superseded by rule on other grounds, V.R.A.P. 5(b), as recognized in State v. Carpenter, 138 Vt. 140, 145 , 412 A.2d 285, 289 (1980).12 Neither case includes a detailed analysis of Article 16. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Jay Orostgreen2 sentences2022When considering discretionary release, “[t]he court [is] not required to explicitly consider each of the[] [§ 7554(b)] factors.” State v. Auclair, 2020 VT 26 , ¶ 21, 211 Vt. 651 (mem.); see State v. Orost, 2017 VT 110, ¶ 11 , 206 Vt. 657 (mem.) (“While the trial court could have provided a more detailed analysis of the 13 V.S.A. § 7554(b) factors, its discussion of the multiple significant factors that were central to its analysis was sufficient . . . .”). 2020“While the trial court could have provided a more detailed analysis of the 13 V.S.A. § 7554(b) factors, its discussion of the multiple significant factors that were central to its analysis was sufficient in this case . . . .” Orost, 2017 VT 110, ¶ 11 . ¶ 22. | 1 | 3 |
State of Vermont v. Angela M. Auclairgreen2 sentences2023See State v. Auclair, 2020 VT 26 , ¶ 21, 211 Vt. 651 , 229 A.3d 1019 (mem.) (“While the trial court could have provided a more detailed analysis of the 13 V.S.A. § 7554(b) factors, its discussion of the multiple significant factors that were central to its analysis was sufficient.”). 2022When considering discretionary release, “[t]he court [is] not required to explicitly consider each of the[] [§ 7554(b)] factors.” State v. Auclair, 2020 VT 26 , ¶ 21, 211 Vt. 651 (mem.); see State v. Orost, 2017 VT 110, ¶ 11 , 206 Vt. 657 (mem.) (“While the trial court could have provided a more detailed analysis of the 13 V.S.A. § 7554(b) factors, its discussion of the multiple significant factors that were central to its analysis was sufficient . . . .”). | 1 | 2 |
Patchell v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See Patchell v. State, 711 P.2d 647, 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985); In re Caito, 459 N.E.2d 1179 , 1183-84 (Ind.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 805 (1984); In re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162, 516 A.2d 976 , 981 n.3 (Md. 1986); State v. Strong, 542 A.2d at 872; People v. Johnson, 507 N.Y.S.2d 791, 793 (Sup. Ct. 1986); Commonwealth v. Swinehart, 664 A.2d 957, 969 (Fa. 1995); Ex parte Shorthouse, 640 S.W2d 924, 928 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1997See Patchell v. State, 711 P.2d 647, 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985); In re Caito, 459 N.E.2d 1179 , 1183-84 (Ind.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 805 (1984); In re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162, 516 A.2d 976 , 981 n.3 (Md. 1986); State v. Strong, 542 A.2d at 872; People v. Johnson, 507 N.Y.S.2d 791, 793 (Sup. Ct. 1986); Commonwealth v. Swinehart, 664 A.2d 957, 969 (Fa. 1995); Ex parte Shorthouse, 640 S.W2d 924, 928 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Town of Walthamgreen2 sentences1997In its decision, the trial court noted that in 1983 the Legislature amended § 4404(c), changing the requirement that the BCA certify in writing its “findings” to a requirement that the BCA certify in writing its notice of decision “with reasons.” See Harris v. Town of Waltham, 158 Vt. 477, 481 , 613 A.2d 696, 698 (1992) (providing a detailed analysis of the legislative history and intent of the 1983 amendment). 1997In its decision, the trial court noted that in 1983 the Legislature amended § 4404(c), changing the requirement that the BCA certify in writing its “findings” to a requirement that the BCA certify in writing its notice of decision “with reasons.” See Harris v. Town of Waltham, 158 Vt. 477, 481 , 613 A.2d 696, 698 (1992) (providing a detailed analysis of the legislative history and intent of the 1983 amendment). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Shorthousegreen1 sentence1997See Patchell v. State, 711 P.2d 647, 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985); In re Caito, 459 N.E.2d 1179 , 1183-84 (Ind.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 805 (1984); In re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162, 516 A.2d 976 , 981 n.3 (Md. 1986); State v. Strong, 542 A.2d at 872; People v. Johnson, 507 N.Y.S.2d 791, 793 (Sup. Ct. 1986); Commonwealth v. Swinehart, 664 A.2d 957, 969 (Fa. 1995); Ex parte Shorthouse, 640 S.W2d 924, 928 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Swinehartgreen1 sentence1997See Patchell v. State, 711 P.2d 647, 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985); In re Caito, 459 N.E.2d 1179 , 1183-84 (Ind.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 805 (1984); In re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162, 516 A.2d 976 , 981 n.3 (Md. 1986); State v. Strong, 542 A.2d at 872; People v. Johnson, 507 N.Y.S.2d 791, 793 (Sup. Ct. 1986); Commonwealth v. Swinehart, 664 A.2d 957, 969 (Fa. 1995); Ex parte Shorthouse, 640 S.W2d 924, 928 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lundgreen2 sentences1987Lund at 180-97 , 475 A.2d at 1061-71 (Peck, J., dissenting). 1987Lund at 180-97 , 475 A.2d at 1061-71 (Peck, J., dissenting). [2] Grant , like the instant case, involved an instruction to the jury which this Court held was defective for the same reason. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
New York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Clarkstown
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 723 . 2009Id. at 723 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Tariq Vialet
green
1 sentence2023The same is true of the court’s failure to recite every bit of testimony favorable to defendant, since “it is clear that the court determined that whatever assurance [his partner’s] testimony offered did not outweigh the court’s concerns based on the circumstances of the crime.” Vialet, 2021 VT 62, ¶ 10 . ¶ 14. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Spring Brook Farm Foundation, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018Id. at 286 , 671 A.2d at 318 . 2018Id . at 286 , 671 A.2d at 318 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Direct Contempt of Caito
green
1 sentence1997See Patchell v. State, 711 P.2d 647, 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985); In re Caito, 459 N.E.2d 1179 , 1183-84 (Ind.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 805 (1984); In re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162, 516 A.2d 976 , 981 n.3 (Md. 1986); State v. Strong, 542 A.2d at 872; People v. Johnson, 507 N.Y.S.2d 791, 793 (Sup. Ct. 1986); Commonwealth v. Swinehart, 664 A.2d 957, 969 (Fa. 1995); Ex parte Shorthouse, 640 S.W2d 924, 928 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Tafoya v. United States
green
1 sentence1997See Patchell v. State, 711 P.2d 647, 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985); In re Caito, 459 N.E.2d 1179 , 1183-84 (Ind.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 805 (1984); In re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162, 516 A.2d 976 , 981 n.3 (Md. 1986); State v. Strong, 542 A.2d at 872; People v. Johnson, 507 N.Y.S.2d 791, 793 (Sup. Ct. 1986); Commonwealth v. Swinehart, 664 A.2d 957, 969 (Fa. 1995); Ex parte Shorthouse, 640 S.W2d 924, 928 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
In Re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162
green
1 sentence1997See Patchell v. State, 711 P.2d 647, 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985); In re Caito, 459 N.E.2d 1179 , 1183-84 (Ind.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 805 (1984); In re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162, 516 A.2d 976 , 981 n.3 (Md. 1986); State v. Strong, 542 A.2d at 872; People v. Johnson, 507 N.Y.S.2d 791, 793 (Sup. Ct. 1986); Commonwealth v. Swinehart, 664 A.2d 957, 969 (Fa. 1995); Ex parte Shorthouse, 640 S.W2d 924, 928 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.