detailed analysis in Maryland

2022In addressing the claim against the City, the court engaged in a detailed analysis of this Court’s decision in Rowley v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 305 Md. 456 (1986), on which both parties had relied.

2022In addressing the claim against the City, the court engaged in a detailed analysis of this Court’s decision in Rowley v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 305 Md. 456 (1986), on which both parties had relied.

2019Id. at 689 .

2018Justice O'Connor specifically addressed whether the victim impact evidence at issue in Payne "so infects the sentencing proceeding as to render it fundamentally unfair[.]" Id. at 831 , 111 S.Ct. 2597 (O'Connor, J., concurring).

2018Justice O'Connor specifically addressed whether the victim impact evidence at issue in Payne "so infects the sentencing proceeding as to render it fundamentally unfair[.]" Id. at 831 , 111 S.Ct. 2597 (O'Connor, J., concurring).

2018We agreed and said, after a detailed analysis of the history of the statute and the purpose of a fee shifting provision, that " 'disbursements' in the context of proceedings to confirm an arbitration award, include attorneys' fees." Id. at 44 , 720 A.2d 912 .

2018Archers Glen Partners, Inc. v. Garner , 176 Md.

2017Cranford We conducted an in-depth analysis of a trial court’s responsibility to examine public records potentially exempted from MPIA disclosure in Cranford v. Montgomery County, 300 Md. 759 , 481 A.2d 221 (1984).

2017Cranford We conducted an in-depth analysis of a trial court’s responsibility to examine public records potentially exempted from MPIA disclosure in Cranford v. Montgomery County, 300 Md. 759 , 481 A.2d 221 (1984).

2016Corp., 226 Md.App. 46, 80 , 126 A.3d 765 (2015) (‘‘[W]e will not engage in a detailed analysis of [the] argument because the issue was not ... adequately briefed on appeal.”), cert. denied, 446 Md. 293 , 132 A.3d 195 (2016); Donati v. State, 215 Md.App. 686, 743 , 84 A.3d 156 ("Because appellant has not presented sufficient legal or factual argument for this Court to address this claim, we decline to consider it,”), cert. denied, 438 Md. 143 , 91 A.3d 614 (2014), 12 .

2016Corp., 226 Md.App. 46, 80 , 126 A.3d 765 (2015) (‘‘[W]e will not engage in a detailed analysis of [the] argument because the issue was not ... adequately briefed on appeal.”), cert. denied, 446 Md. 293 , 132 A.3d 195 (2016); Donati v. State, 215 Md.App. 686, 743 , 84 A.3d 156 ("Because appellant has not presented sufficient legal or factual argument for this Court to address this claim, we decline to consider it,”), cert. denied, 438 Md. 143 , 91 A.3d 614 (2014), 12 .

2016A detailed analysis of the Regional District Act is beyond the scope of this opinion, We refer the curious reader to Judge Harrell’s thorough and scholarly discussion of the history of the Act in Prince George’s County v. Zimmer Development Co., 444 Md. 490, 523-30 , 120 A.3d 677 (2015). 8 .

2016A detailed analysis of the Regional District Act is beyond the scope of this opinion, We refer the curious reader to Judge Harrell’s thorough and scholarly discussion of the history of the Act in Prince George’s County v. Zimmer Development Co., 444 Md. 490, 523-30 , 120 A.3d 677 (2015). 8 .

2016Corp., 226 Md.App. 46, 80 , 126 A.3d 765 (2015) (‘‘[W]e will not engage in a detailed analysis of [the] argument because the issue was not ... adequately briefed on appeal.”), cert. denied, 446 Md. 293 , 132 A.3d 195 (2016); Donati v. State, 215 Md.App. 686, 743 , 84 A.3d 156 ("Because appellant has not presented sufficient legal or factual argument for this Court to address this claim, we decline to consider it,”), cert. denied, 438 Md. 143 , 91 A.3d 614 (2014), 12 .

2016Corp., 226 Md.App. 46, 80 , 126 A.3d 765 (2015) (‘‘[W]e will not engage in a detailed analysis of [the] argument because the issue was not ... adequately briefed on appeal.”), cert. denied, 446 Md. 293 , 132 A.3d 195 (2016); Donati v. State, 215 Md.App. 686, 743 , 84 A.3d 156 ("Because appellant has not presented sufficient legal or factual argument for this Court to address this claim, we decline to consider it,”), cert. denied, 438 Md. 143 , 91 A.3d 614 (2014), 12 .

2015The Court noted that Shenker contended that this “tactic was designed to foreclose a shareholder vote and to ensure that Investor Respondents’ acquisition of Laureate closed for the lowest price and as quickly as possible.” Shenker, 411 Md. at 331 n. 8, 983 A.2d 408 . 20 .

2015The Court noted that Shenker contended that this “tactic was designed to foreclose a shareholder vote and to ensure that Investor Respondents’ acquisition of Laureate closed for the lowest price and as quickly as possible.” Shenker, 411 Md. at 331 n. 8, 983 A.2d 408 . 20 .

2015Although we will not engage in a detailed analysis of Mr. Sutton’s argument because the issue was not raised below and not adequately briefed on appeal, see Honeycutt v. Honeycutt, 150 Md.App. 604, 618 , 822 A.2d 551 (when party fails to adequately brief an argument, court may decline to address it on appeal), cert. denied, 376 Md. 544 , 831 A.2d 4 (2003), we do note, without deciding the issue, that at least one court has disagreed with Mr. Sutton’s argument that, "once the corporation ceases to exist, as did FedFirst after the [cjlosing, any derivative complaint” filed prior to the merger wo

2015Although we will not engage in a detailed analysis of Mr. Sutton’s argument because the issue was not raised below and not adequately briefed on appeal, see Honeycutt v. Honeycutt, 150 Md.App. 604, 618 , 822 A.2d 551 (when party fails to adequately brief an argument, court may decline to address it on appeal), cert. denied, 376 Md. 544 , 831 A.2d 4 (2003), we do note, without deciding the issue, that at least one court has disagreed with Mr. Sutton’s argument that, "once the corporation ceases to exist, as did FedFirst after the [cjlosing, any derivative complaint” filed prior to the merger wo

2015Id. at 208, 613 A.2d 986 .

2014Although we "look[ ] through the circuit court’s ... decision and evaluated the decision of the agency,” People's Counsel v. Surina, 400 Md. 662, 681 , 929 A.2d 899 (2007), we, nevertheless, set forth the circuit court’s detailed analysis and conclusions. 10 .

2014Although we "look[ ] through the circuit court’s ... decision and evaluated the decision of the agency,” People's Counsel v. Surina, 400 Md. 662, 681 , 929 A.2d 899 (2007), we, nevertheless, set forth the circuit court’s detailed analysis and conclusions. 10 .

2013Id. at 220-21, 703 A.2d 150 .

2012The court stated that the' prosecution had the burden of proving that: 1) the defendant was arrested; 2) the arrest was lawful; and 3) the defendant resisted or refused to submit to that arrest.” Id. at 609-10 , 602 A.2d 701 (emphasis added).

2012The court stated that the' prosecution had the burden of proving that: 1) the defendant was arrested; 2) the arrest was lawful; and 3) the defendant resisted or refused to submit to that arrest.” Id. at 609-10 , 602 A.2d 701 (emphasis added).

2011Id. at 690-91, 98 S.Ct. at 2035-36 .

2011Id. at 690-91, 98 S.Ct. at 2035-36 .

2007A more detailed analysis of the Richards and Wilson opinions, as well as other cases applying the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule to evidence seized in violation of the “knock and announce” principle, can be found in State v. Lee, supra, Md. 275, 374 Md. 275 , 821 A.2d 922 .

2007A more detailed analysis of the Richards and Wilson opinions, as well as other cases applying the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule to evidence seized in violation of the “knock and announce” principle, can be found in State v. Lee, supra, Md. 275, 374 Md. 275 , 821 A.2d 922 .

2006Judge Cathell, then writing for the Court of Special Appeals, provided a detailed framework for the consideration of due process in connection with parental rights in Wagner v. Wagner, 109 Md.App. 1 , 674 A.2d 1 (1996), cert. denied, Wagner v. Wagner, 343 Md. 334 , 681 A.2d 69 (1996): 13 *674 Article 24 of Maryland’s Declaration of Rights states: “That no man ought to be taken or imprisoned or disseized of his freehold, liberties or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or, in any manner, destroyed, or deprived of his life, liberty or property, but by the judgment of his peers, or by the Law of

2006Judge Cathell, then writing for the Court of Special Appeals, provided a detailed framework for the consideration of due process in connection with parental rights in Wagner v. Wagner, 109 Md.App. 1 , 674 A.2d 1 (1996), cert. denied, Wagner v. Wagner, 343 Md. 334 , 681 A.2d 69 (1996): 13 *674 Article 24 of Maryland’s Declaration of Rights states: “That no man ought to be taken or imprisoned or disseized of his freehold, liberties or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or, in any manner, destroyed, or deprived of his life, liberty or property, but by the judgment of his peers, or by the Law of

2000Cotton, 751 F.2d at 1148 .

2000Procedural Distinction No. 1: The Thoughtful Weighing of the Eighth Factor In Alston, 331 Md. at 507 , 629 A.2d 70 , the Court of Appeals explained why “in a case such as this the eighth factor should *222 be given greater weight than the others” and faulted both the trial court and this Court for having “indicated that the eighth factor should not be given any more weight than any other factor.” Heedful of Alston, Judge Nolan acknowledged that the eighth factor “should be given considerable weight.” In a 23-page Opinion and Order, she made a detailed analysis of all of the factors listed in §

2000Procedural Distinction No. 1: The Thoughtful Weighing of the Eighth Factor In Alston, 331 Md. at 507 , 629 A.2d 70 , the Court of Appeals explained why “in a case such as this the eighth factor should *222 be given greater weight than the others” and faulted both the trial court and this Court for having “indicated that the eighth factor should not be given any more weight than any other factor.” Heedful of Alston, Judge Nolan acknowledged that the eighth factor “should be given considerable weight.” In a 23-page Opinion and Order, she made a detailed analysis of all of the factors listed in §

1997The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has explained: “[T]o guard against misidentification and the conviction of the innocent it is not enough that the trial judge himself be specifically alerted to the detailed factors that enter into the totality of the circumstances [under which the identification was made], but that the jury should also be so charged.” Holley, 502 F.2d at 275 .

1997The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has explained: "[T]o guard against misidentification and the conviction of the innocent it is not enough that the trial judge himself be specifically alerted to the detailed factors that enter into the totality of the circumstances [under which the identification was made], but that the jury should also be so charged." Holley, 502 F.2d at 275 .

1996The New Jersey Supreme Court made a detailed analysis of the work of paralegals in In re Opinion No. 24 of the Comm. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, 128 N.J. 114 , 607 A.2d 962 (1992).

1996The New Jersey Supreme Court made a detailed analysis of the work of paralegals in In re Opinion No. 24 of the Comm. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, 128 N.J. 114 , 607 A.2d 962 (1992).