Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
26 North Carolina opinions name it 4 courts 1975–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thackergreen2 sentences2012As to defendant’s arguments regarding the trial court’s inquiry into defendant’s request for substitute counsel, we note that the Thacker Court expressly rejected the defendant’s argument “that failure to make a detailed inquiry [into an alleged conflict with appointed counsel] amounts to a per se violation of defendant’s right to counsel.” 301 N.C. at 353 , 271 S.E.2d at 255 (emphasis added). 2012As to defendant’s arguments regarding the trial court’s inquiry into defendant’s request for substitute counsel, we note that the Thacker Court expressly rejected the defendant’s argument “that failure to make a detailed inquiry [into an alleged conflict with appointed counsel] amounts to a per se violation of defendant’s right to counsel.” 301 N.C. at 353 , 271 S.E.2d at 255 (emphasis added). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Kinardgreen2 sentences2008State v. Kinard, 54 N.C. 1983If the evidence strongly suggests the likelihood of irreparable misidentification, the identification issue would become a substantial feature of the case, and the trial judge is required, even in the absence of a request, to properly instruct the jury as to the detailed factors that enter into the totality of the circumstances relating to identification. 54 N.C. | 1 | 2 |
Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. v. Hardersgreen1 sentence2020See Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, 228 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Subpoena Issued to Commodity Futures Trading Commissiongreen1 sentence2018Tex. Mar. 7, 2011) (“Federal district courts are split, but clearly, the majority of courts do not recognize an absolute privilege for settlement agreements and negotiations.”); In re Subpoena Issued to CFTC, 370 F. Supp. 2d 201, 212 (D.D.C. 2005) (declining to recognize “a federal settlement privilege” after engaging in a detailed analysis of federal jurisprudence on the recognition of new privileges). 23. | 1 | 1 |
Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.green2 sentences2008See Sides v. Hospital, 287 N.C. 14, 20 , 213 S.E.2d 297, 301 (1975) (“we hold that Cabarrus Memorial Hospital is an agency of Cabarrus County”). 2008See Sides v. Hospital, 287 N.C. 14, 20 , 213 S.E.2d 297, 301 (1975) (“we hold that Cabarrus Memorial Hospital is an agency of Cabarrus County”). | 1 | 1 |
Bishop v. Bishopgreen2 sentences2003Super. 593, 604 , 671 A.2d 644, 649 (1995). 2003For example, in Bishop v. Bishop, the New Jersey court engaged in a detailed inquiry before concluding that the child, a twenty-year-old cadet enrolled at the United States Military Academy at West Point, was emancipated. 287 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Empire Power Co. v. N. C. Department of Environmentgreen2 sentences2002N.C.G.S. § 150B-1 (2001); see also Empire Power Co. v. North Carolina Dep't of E.H.N.R., 337 N.C. 569 , 447 S.E.2d 768 (1994)(for a detailed analysis of standing under the NCAPA and the Water and Air Resources Act where third-party petitioner appealed the decision of EMC to grant an air pollution control permit). 2002N.C.G.S. § 150B-1 (2001); see also Empire Power Co. v. North Carolina Dep't of E.H.N.R., 337 N.C. 569 , 447 S.E.2d 768 (1994)(for a detailed analysis of standing under the NCAPA and the Water and Air Resources Act where third-party petitioner appealed the decision of EMC to grant an air pollution control permit). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Reesered2 sentences1991See State v. Reese, 319 N.C. 110, 121 , 353 S.E.2d 352, 358 (1987). 1991See State v. Reese, 319 N.C. 110, 121 , 353 S.E.2d 352, 358 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Agustin Gallegos-Curielgreen1 sentence1984The exercise of routine or clearly necessary defense motions in the pretrial stage does not meet the threshold for more detailed inquiry and does not suffice to raise the presumption of vindictiveness. 681 F. 2d at 1167, 1169 . | 1 | 1 |
Hawks v. Town of Valdesegreen2 sentences1981See Hawks v. Town of Valdese, 299 N.C. 1 , 261 S.E. 2d 90 (1980) for a detailed analysis of the requirements of "contiguity" and “cohesiveness.” 1981See Hawks v. Town of Valdese, 299 N.C. 1 , 261 S.E. 2d 90 (1980) for a detailed analysis of the requirements of "contiguity" and “cohesiveness.” | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Parker
green
2 sentences2009In State v. Parker, 315 N.C. 222 , 337 S.E.2d 487 (1985), our Supreme Court performed a detailed analysis of the corpus delicti rule. 2009In State v. Parker, 315 N.C. 222 , 337 S.E.2d 487 (1985), our Supreme Court performed a detailed analysis of the corpus delicti rule. | 2 | 2009–2013 |
Munoz v. Caldwell Memorial Hospital
green
2 sentences2011Generally, "`injuries sustained by an employee while going to or from work are not ordinarily compensable' because the injuries do not arise out of or in the course of employment." Munoz v. Caldwell Mem'l Hosp ., 171 N.C. 2011Generally, "`injuries sustained by an employee while going to or from work are not ordinarily compensable' because the injuries do not arise out of or in the course of employment. " Munoz v. Caldwell Mem'l Hosp ., 171 N.C. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Matter of Arhb
green
2 sentences2011App. 77 (2007), disc. rev. den. , 362 N.C. 235 (2008), the Court went through a detailed analysis as follows. 2011App. 77 , 639 S.E.2d 88 (2007), disc. rev. denied , 362 N.C. 235 , 659 S.E.2d 732 (2008), the Court went through a detailed analysis as follows. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
In Re DMM
green
2 sentences2007It should be noted that the case relied upon by the majority, In re D.M.M, ___ N.C.App. ___, 633 S.E.2d 715 (2006), there was a detailed analysis of the appellant's assertions of prejudice, apart from the discussion of the length of the delay. ___ N.C.App. at ___, 633 S.E.2d at 717-18 . 2007It should be noted that the case relied upon by the majority, In re D.M.M, ___ N.C.App. ___, 633 S.E.2d 715 (2006), there was a detailed analysis of the appellant's assertions of prejudice, apart from the discussion of the length of the delay. ___ N.C.App. at ___, 633 S.E.2d at 717-18 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. McClamb
green
2 sentences2019App. at 758 , 760 S.E.2d at 341 . 2019In a detailed analysis, the Court distinguished Stokes , explaining that " Stokes is controlling with respect to the meaning of the term 'sexual act' ... only in light of the narrow factual circumstances and legal issue raised therein." McClamb , 234 N.C. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Moody v. Able Outdoor, Inc.
green
1 sentence2019Moody , 169 N.C. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Hollin v. Johnston County Council on Aging
green
1 sentence2011App. 77 , 639 S.E.2d 88 (2007), disc. rev. denied , 362 N.C. 235 , 659 S.E.2d 732 (2008), the Court went through a detailed analysis as follows. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Hughes v. RIVERA-ORTIZ
neutral
1 sentence2011App. 77 , 639 S.E.2d 88 (2007), disc. rev. denied , 362 N.C. 235 , 659 S.E.2d 732 (2008), the Court went through a detailed analysis as follows. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Lennie v. Profile Products, LLC
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 639 , 652 S.E.2d at 237 . 2009Id. at 639 , 652 S.E.2d at 237 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence1988The Supreme Court also said, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 695 , 80 *681 L.Ed. 2d at 698. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Morrison v. Stallworth
green
1 sentence1988Morrison v. Stallworth, 73 N.C. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
State v. Bundridge
green
2 sentences1982The Court further held that the failure to give such instruction might tend to cause the jury to return a verdict of guilty to ensure that the defendant would be incarcerated for the safety of the public and for his own safety; that by giving the gist of N.C.G.S. 122-84.1, the court removes this confusion and puts the trial back upon an even keel; and that giving a more detailed instruction than requested by defendant did not result in prejudicial error. 294 N.C. 45 , 239 S.E. 2d 811 . 1982The Court further held that the failure to give such instruction might tend to cause the jury to return a verdict of guilty to ensure that the defendant would be incarcerated for the safety of the public and for his own safety; that by giving the gist of N.C.G.S. 122-84.1, the court removes this confusion and puts the trial back upon an even keel; and that giving a more detailed instruction than requested by defendant did not result in prejudicial error. 294 N.C. 45 , 239 S.E. 2d 811 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Williams v. Williams
green
2 sentences1981The Supreme Court in Williams v. Williams, 299 N.C. 174 , 261 S.E. 2d 849 (1980), supplies a detailed analysis of the definition of a dependent spouse. 1981The Supreme Court in Williams v. Williams, 299 N.C. 174 , 261 S.E. 2d 849 (1980), supplies a detailed analysis of the definition of a dependent spouse. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
State v. Noell
green
2 sentences1975State v. Noell, 284 N.C. 670 , 202 S.E. 2d 750 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 224 N.C. 304 , 30 S.E. 2d 43 (1944) ; State v. Hendricks, 207 N.C. 873 , 178 S.E. 557 (1935) ; State v. O’Neal, 187 N.C. 22 , 120 S.E. 817 (1924). 1975State v. Noell, 284 N.C. 670 , 202 S.E. 2d 750 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 224 N.C. 304 , 30 S.E. 2d 43 (1944) ; State v. Hendricks, 207 N.C. 873 , 178 S.E. 557 (1935) ; State v. O’Neal, 187 N.C. 22 , 120 S.E. 817 (1924). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
State v. . Hendricks
neutral
2 sentences1975State v. Noell, 284 N.C. 670 , 202 S.E. 2d 750 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 224 N.C. 304 , 30 S.E. 2d 43 (1944) ; State v. Hendricks, 207 N.C. 873 , 178 S.E. 557 (1935) ; State v. O’Neal, 187 N.C. 22 , 120 S.E. 817 (1924). 1975State v. Noell, 284 N.C. 670 , 202 S.E. 2d 750 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 224 N.C. 304 , 30 S.E. 2d 43 (1944) ; State v. Hendricks, 207 N.C. 873 , 178 S.E. 557 (1935) ; State v. O’Neal, 187 N.C. 22 , 120 S.E. 817 (1924). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
State v. . Gordon
green
2 sentences1975State v. Noell, 284 N.C. 670 , 202 S.E. 2d 750 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 224 N.C. 304 , 30 S.E. 2d 43 (1944) ; State v. Hendricks, 207 N.C. 873 , 178 S.E. 557 (1935) ; State v. O’Neal, 187 N.C. 22 , 120 S.E. 817 (1924). 1975State v. Noell, 284 N.C. 670 , 202 S.E. 2d 750 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 224 N.C. 304 , 30 S.E. 2d 43 (1944) ; State v. Hendricks, 207 N.C. 873 , 178 S.E. 557 (1935) ; State v. O’Neal, 187 N.C. 22 , 120 S.E. 817 (1924). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
State v. . O'Neal
green
2 sentences1975State v. Noell, 284 N.C. 670 , 202 S.E. 2d 750 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 224 N.C. 304 , 30 S.E. 2d 43 (1944) ; State v. Hendricks, 207 N.C. 873 , 178 S.E. 557 (1935) ; State v. O’Neal, 187 N.C. 22 , 120 S.E. 817 (1924). 1975State v. Noell, 284 N.C. 670 , 202 S.E. 2d 750 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 224 N.C. 304 , 30 S.E. 2d 43 (1944) ; State v. Hendricks, 207 N.C. 873 , 178 S.E. 557 (1935) ; State v. O’Neal, 187 N.C. 22 , 120 S.E. 817 (1924). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.