Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aubri Vahai v. Ryan Gertschgreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., Vahai, ¶ 58, 455 P.3d at 1234 (“Because Ms. Vahai did not object to any of the allegedly improper comments, our review is for plain error.”); U.S. Currency, ¶ 25, 278 P.3d at 240 (“[I]ssues . . . not raised below . . . are . . . subject to a plain error analysis.”); W. | 1 | 1 |
Broadhead v. Broadheadgreen1 sentence2013We have repeatedly stated that generally "a decision letter does 'not constitute a judicial determination which may be considered a final order?" Parris v. Parris, 2009 WY 44, ¶17 , 204 P.3d 298, 303 (Wyo.2009), quoting Broadhead v. Broadhead, 737 P.2d 731, 733 (Wyo.1987). [¶11] In addition, the district court's letter plainly contemplated further proceedings by allowing the parties to notify it of any pending issues and directing Mother's counsel to prepare a final order. | 1 | 1 |
Parris v. Parrisgreen2 sentences2013We have repeatedly stated that generally "a decision letter does 'not constitute a judicial determination which may be considered a final order?" Parris v. Parris, 2009 WY 44, ¶17 , 204 P.3d 298, 303 (Wyo.2009), quoting Broadhead v. Broadhead, 737 P.2d 731, 733 (Wyo.1987). [¶11] In addition, the district court's letter plainly contemplated further proceedings by allowing the parties to notify it of any pending issues and directing Mother's counsel to prepare a final order. 2013We have repeatedly stated that generally "a decision letter does 'not constitute a judicial determination which may be considered a final order?" Parris v. Parris, 2009 WY 44, ¶17 , 204 P.3d 298, 303 (Wyo.2009), quoting Broadhead v. Broadhead, 737 P.2d 731, 733 (Wyo.1987). [¶11] In addition, the district court's letter plainly contemplated further proceedings by allowing the parties to notify it of any pending issues and directing Mother's counsel to prepare a final order. | 1 | 1 |
Chapman v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Although this Court has previously recognized that a defendant’s ability to hear the proceedings carries constitutional implications, see Chapman v. State, 2001 WY 25, ¶ 31 , 18 P.3d 1164, 1176 (Wyo.2001), we have not had occasion to undertake a detailed analysis of the question. 2010Although this Court has previously recognized that a defendant’s ability to hear the proceedings carries constitutional implications, see Chapman v. State, 2001 WY 25, ¶ 31 , 18 P.3d 1164, 1176 (Wyo.2001), we have not had occasion to undertake a detailed analysis of the question. | 1 | 1 |
Janpol v. Stategreen2 sentences2008The appellant believes we should review this "error" for an abuse of discretion, while the State argues that the lack of an objection below means that plain error analysis is appropriate. [¶21] Having just decided this very issue in Janpol v. State, 2008 WY 21, ¶¶ 14-20 , 178 P.3d 396, 402-408 (Wyo.2008), we decline to repeat the detailed analysis of that case. 2008The appellant believes we should review this "error" for an abuse of discretion, while the State argues that the lack of an objection below means that plain error analysis is appropriate. [¶21] Having just decided this very issue in Janpol v. State, 2008 WY 21, ¶¶ 14-20 , 178 P.3d 396, 402-408 (Wyo.2008), we decline to repeat the detailed analysis of that case. | 1 | 1 |
Eustice v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Eustice v. State, 11 P.3d 897, 904 (Wyo.2000). | 1 | 1 |
Masinter v. Marksteingreen2 sentences2003For a detailed analysis of this controversy, see Masinter v. Markstein, 2002 WY 64, ¶¶ 3-5 , 45 P.3d 237, 239-40 (Wyo.2002). 4 . 2003For a detailed analysis of this controversy, see Masinter v. Markstein, 2002 WY 64, ¶¶ 3-5 , 45 P.3d 237, 239-40 (Wyo.2002). 4 . | 1 | 1 |
Dudley v. Stategreen1 sentence2001Without delving into a detailed analysis of the applicable standard of review, see Dudley v. State, 951 P.2d 1176, 1178-80 (Wyo.1998); Newport v. State, 983 P.2d 1213, 1216 (Wyo.1999) ("error-perse rule applies when the prosecution actually asks a witness to give an opinion as to the accused's guilt"), we are satisfied the record does not support Chapman's contention. | 1 | 1 |
Newport v. Stategreen1 sentence2001Without delving into a detailed analysis of the applicable standard of review, see Dudley v. State, 951 P.2d 1176, 1178-80 (Wyo.1998); Newport v. State, 983 P.2d 1213, 1216 (Wyo.1999) ("error-perse rule applies when the prosecution actually asks a witness to give an opinion as to the accused's guilt"), we are satisfied the record does not support Chapman's contention. | 1 | 1 |
Clayton v. Thompsongreen2 sentences1989See a detailed analysis of liability, Clayton, 475 So.2d 439 . 1989See a detailed analysis of liability, Clayton, 475 So.2d 439 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jr v. Tlw
green
2 sentences2024As we concluded in JR, Mr. Bailey waived his right to contest the children’s preferences when he did not present evidence of those preferences. 2016 WY 45, ¶ 15 , 371 P.3d at 576 . [¶16] In sum, the district court provided a detailed analysis for all of the statutory factors, identified the primary caregiver, and acknowledged the children’s preferences and GAL recommendations in its Decision Letter. 2024As we concluded in JR, Mr. Bailey waived his right to contest the children’s preferences when he did not present evidence of those preferences. 2016 WY 45, ¶ 15 , 371 P.3d at 576 . [¶16] In sum, the district court provided a detailed analysis for all of the statutory factors, identified the primary caregiver, and acknowledged the children’s preferences and GAL recommendations in its Decision Letter. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Ernest Ray Watts v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Hoem v. State
green
2 sentences1991Whatever standard of statutory interpretation this court applies, e.g., strict, realistic or accommodative, White v. State, 784 P.2d 1313 (Wyo.1989); Hoem v. State, 756 P.2d 780 (Wyo.1988), the same standard should be consistently used and not whatever standard may from time to time serve to justify a result-oriented decision. 1991A detailed analysis of the Wyoming statute is also found in Note, Spouse's Testimony in Criminal Cases, 19 Wyo.L.J. 35 (1964), which discusses witness disqualification and privileged evidence as a confidential communication. [18] Whatever standard of statutory interpretation this court applies, e.g., strict, realistic or accommodative, White v. State, 784 P.2d 1313 (Wyo. 1989); Hoem v. State, 756 P.2d 780 (Wyo. 1988), the same standard should be consistently used and not whatever standard may from time to time serve to justify a result-oriented decision. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
White v. State
green
2 sentences1991Whatever standard of statutory interpretation this court applies, e.g., strict, realistic or accommodative, White v. State, 784 P.2d 1313 (Wyo.1989); Hoem v. State, 756 P.2d 780 (Wyo.1988), the same standard should be consistently used and not whatever standard may from time to time serve to justify a result-oriented decision. 1991A detailed analysis of the Wyoming statute is also found in Note, Spouse's Testimony in Criminal Cases, 19 Wyo.L.J. 35 (1964), which discusses witness disqualification and privileged evidence as a confidential communication. [18] Whatever standard of statutory interpretation this court applies, e.g., strict, realistic or accommodative, White v. State, 784 P.2d 1313 (Wyo. 1989); Hoem v. State, 756 P.2d 780 (Wyo. 1988), the same standard should be consistently used and not whatever standard may from time to time serve to justify a result-oriented decision. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Matter of Christina T.
green
1 sentence1989There are well-considered cases which until now appear to be without converse persuasion which reject the affidavit-based process for final issue determination in this character of constitutional right inquiry. 1 A detailed analysis is found in Matter of Christina T., 590 P.2d 189 (Okl.1979), which involved the similar situation of the incarcerated father. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.