detailed analysis in Pennsylvania

1976In United States v. Menke, 468 F.2d 20, 24 (3d Cir. 1972), the court stated: "In [Government of the Virgin Islands v. Berne, 412 F.2d 1055 (3d Cir. 1969)], we held that where a defendant is given the detailed warnings mandated by Miranda v. Arizona . . . and thereafter `voluntarily submits to interrogation and freely offers information on the existence and location of specifically identified evidence, and further agrees to surrender the evidence to the police, fully cognizant of his right to remain silent and fully aware that the information he provides may be used against him, the *77 seizure

1976In United States v. Menke, 468 F.2d 20, 24 (3d Cir. 1972), the court stated: “In [Government of the Virgin Islands v. Berne, 412 F.2d 1055 (3d Cir. 1969)], we held that where a defendant is given the detailed warnings mandated by Miranda v. Arizona ... and thereafter ‘voluntarily submits to interrogation and freely offers information on the existence and location of specifically identified evidence, and further agrees to surrender the evidence to the police, fully cognizant of his right to remain silent and fully aware that the information he provides may be used against him, the seizure of su

2016See Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 8 (1999) (stating that a finding of structural error, which requires automatic reversal, is reserved for “a very limited class of cases”) (citations and quotation marks omitted). [J-89A-2015 and J-89B-2015] - 52

2016See Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 8 (1999) (stating that a finding of structural error, which requires automatic reversal, is reserved for “a very limited class of cases”) (citations and quotation marks omitted). [J-89A-2015 and J-89B-2015] - 52

2001See Lorah v. Luppold Roofing Co., 424 Pa.Super. 439, 445 , 622 A.2d 1383, 1386 (1993) (“[T]he tenor of our law is that the violation of safety conditions alone cannot be the basis for a finding that the Peculiar Risk Doctrine applies, as many, if not most, industrial [accidents] result from a failure to follow ... safety regulations.”); Peffer, 406 Pa.Super. at 465 , 594 A.2d at 713 (“Violation of .safety conditions alone, however, cannot be a basis for carving out exceptions to the rule that the owner is not liable for injuries incurred by employees of a subcontractor, as to do so would nulli

2001See Lorah v. Luppold Roofing Co., 424 Pa.Super. 439, 445 , 622 A.2d 1383, 1386 (1993) (“[T]he tenor of our law is that the violation of safety conditions alone cannot be the basis for a finding that the Peculiar Risk Doctrine applies, as many, if not most, industrial [accidents] result from a failure to follow ... safety regulations.”); Peffer, 406 Pa.Super. at 465 , 594 A.2d at 713 (“Violation of .safety conditions alone, however, cannot be a basis for carving out exceptions to the rule that the owner is not liable for injuries incurred by employees of a subcontractor, as to do so would nulli

2001See Lorah v. Luppold Roofing Co., 424 Pa.Super. 439, 445 , 622 A.2d 1383, 1386 (1993) (“[T]he tenor of our law is that the violation of safety conditions alone cannot be the basis for a finding that the Peculiar Risk Doctrine applies, as many, if not most, industrial [accidents] result from a failure to follow ... safety regulations.”); Peffer, 406 Pa.Super. at 465 , 594 A.2d at 713 (“Violation of .safety conditions alone, however, cannot be a basis for carving out exceptions to the rule that the owner is not liable for injuries incurred by employees of a subcontractor, as to do so would nulli

2001See Lorah v. Luppold Roofing Co., 424 Pa.Super. 439, 445 , 622 A.2d 1383, 1386 (1993) (“[T]he tenor of our law is that the violation of safety conditions alone cannot be the basis for a finding that the Peculiar Risk Doctrine applies, as many, if not most, industrial [accidents] result from a failure to follow ... safety regulations.”); Peffer, 406 Pa.Super. at 465 , 594 A.2d at 713 (“Violation of .safety conditions alone, however, cannot be a basis for carving out exceptions to the rule that the owner is not liable for injuries incurred by employees of a subcontractor, as to do so would nulli

2025See Melwood Corp. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, 528 A.2d 668, 670 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1987) (“[W]here the fact[]finder has failed to make necessary 1 Because Licensee held a CDL, she was entitled to receive “the more detailed warning” “that refusal to submit to the test will result in [her] being disqualified from operating a commercial motor vehicle.” Bergenstock v. Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 311 A.3d 1201 , 1207 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2024) (quoting 75 Pa.C.S. § 1613(c)) (emphasis added).

2025See id. at 1027 ; see also Davis, 262 A.3d at 596 .

2025See Postie, 200 A.3d at 1026 .

2025See id. at 1027 ; see also Davis, 262 A.3d at 596 .

2024See id. (citing and quoting Banfield v. Cortes, 110 A.3d 155, 170 (Pa. 2015); Dayhoff v. Weaver, 808 A.2d 1002 , 1010 n.21 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002); and In re Gen.

2023See R.J.S., 901 A.2d at 516 (holding that remand is proper where the evidence of record is insufficient to permit an assessment of the emotional bonds between parent and children).

2023See WMI Grp., Inc. v. Fox, 109 A.3d 740 , 744 n.5 (Pa. Super. 2015) (noting that this Court may consider documents not included in the record but which are in the reproduced record where neither party disputes the accuracy of the documents) -4- J-A28031-22 agreement entered into between [Toll and the SEC] relating to the documents, records, and disclosures . . . to the SEC[,]” and “a detailed privilege log of all documents, records, and disclosures Toll . . . provided, produced, or otherwise made to the SEC.” See Order, 7/15/21, at ¶¶ 3-4 (underline in original) (“the July 2021 order”).3 Toll

2018When a “representative of the Commonwealth is responsible for scheduling cases,” “faithful compliance with the legal forms of proof” is required, including a detailed inquiry “into the Commonwealth’s assertions of necessary delay,” supported by “trial schedules and justifications.” Commonwealth v. Bond, 532 A.2d 339, 343 (Pa. 1987) (plurality opinion).

2018Father's complaints of error are addressed in the court's written memorandum containing a detailed analysis of the aforementioned statutory factors and in comments made to the parents at the conclusion of trial, to which the undersigned defers for additionai explanation, see J.R.M. v. J.EA., 33 A.3d 647, 650 (Pa.Super.2011).

2018Mother acknowledges that the trial court need not set forth a detailed analysis of the evidence of record, citing M.J.M. v. M.L.G., 63 A.3d 331, 336 (Pa. Super. 2013), but contends that the “problem in the case at bar is that there is no indication that the trial court considered” Child’s testimony.

2017As stated in In re Russo, the general rule "must yield to the paramount principle that the best interests of each individual child must be the determining factor." In re Russo, 346 A.2d 355, 357 (Pa. Super. 1975).

2014See Leach, 729 A.2d at 611 (stating that a course of conduct can be established by a repetitive pattern of behavior); see also 5 Recently, an en banc panel of this Court, in Commonwealth v. Kelly, 2014 PA Super 243 (Pa. Super. 2014), engaged in a detailed analysis of the meaning of the phrase “course of conduct” as used in the grading provision of the corruption of minors statute, and held that “the use of the phrase ‘course of conduct’ in the first provision of [the statute] imposes a requirement of multiple acts over time, in the same manner in which the term is used in the harassment … stat

2014See Leach, 729 A.2d at 611 (stating that a course of conduct can be established by a repetitive pattern of behavior); see also 5 Recently, an en banc panel of this Court, in Commonwealth v. Kelly, 2014 PA Super 243 (Pa. Super. 2014), engaged in a detailed analysis of the meaning of the phrase “course of conduct” as used in the grading provision of the corruption of minors statute, and held that “the use of the phrase ‘course of conduct’ in the first provision of [the statute] imposes a requirement of multiple acts over time, in the same manner in which the term is used in the harassment … stat

2007That role does not include making a detailed inquiry into the mental state, the physical and financial condition of the retiring member or to second-guess the member’s choice.” Welsh v. State Employees’ Retirement Board, 808 A.2d 261, 264 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002).

2006See Commonwealth v. Lemon, 804 A.2d 34, 38 (Pa.Super.2002) (stating that “when an appellant fails to identify in a vague Pa. R.A.P.1925(b) statement the specific issues he/she wants to raise on appeal, the issue is waived, even if the trial court guesses correctly and addresses the issue in its Pa.R.A.P.1925(a) opinion.”). ¶ 13 Indeed, the trial court eloquently expressed its frustration when tackling the Wells’s questions in its opinion and even urged this Court to find them waived due to their lack of clarity.