44 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Credit Center, Inc.green2 sentences1990See Brown v. Credit Center, Inc., 444 So.2d 358 (Miss.1983) (providing a detailed analysis of Rule 56 construction and enforcement). 1990See Brown v. Credit Center, Inc., 444 So.2d 358 (Miss. 1983) (providing a detailed analysis of Rule 56 construction and enforcement). | 3 | 3 |
Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Morrisongreen2 sentences2018Morrison , 905 So.2d at 1248 (¶ 129) (emphasis added). ¶ 68. 2018Morrison , 905 So.2d at 1248 (¶ 129) (emphasis added). ¶ 68. | 2 | 2 |
Ferguson v. Fergusongreen2 sentences2014First, we note the chancellor made comprehensive findings in classifying the parties’ assets and in dividing the marital estate, including a detailed analysis of the factors outlined in Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So.2d 921, 928 (Miss.1994). 2013Regardless, the chancellor made in-depth findings in determining the marital assets and equitably dividing the same, including a detailed analysis of the factors outlined in Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So.2d 921, 928 (Miss.1994). | 2 | 2 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2007In Jones v. State, this Court went through a detailed analysis of whether the failure to provide a defendant with an initial appearance within forty-eight hours was prejudicial to the defendant. 841 So.2d 115, 131-134 (Miss.2003). 2006In Jones v. State, this Court went through a detailed analysis of whether the failure to provide a defendant with an initial appearance within forty-eight hours was prejudicial to the defendant. 841 So. 2d 115, 131-134 (Miss. 2003). | 2 | 2 |
Hemsley v. Hemsleygreen2 sentences1999However, in Hemsley v. Hemsley, 639 So.2d 909, 915 (Miss.1994) the Court stated the wife need not liquidate her savings account to pay her attorney's fees. 1995In doing so, the chancellor could use the detailed test given in Hemsley v. Hemsley, 639 So.2d 909, 912-13 (Miss. 1994), to arrive at an equitable distribution after application *481 of the Louisiana law to the pension plan. | 2 | 2 |
Barker v. Wingogreen2 sentences2011However, the trial judge made a detailed analysis of the appropriate factors outlined in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972) regarding the speedy-trial complaint and found no prejudice. ... 2011However, the trial judge made a detailed analysis of the appropriate factors outlined in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972) regarding the speedy-trial complaint and found no prejudice. ... | 1 | 5 |
Young v. Stategreen1 sentence2025“We do not reverse a conviction for an erroneous evidentiary ruling unless ‘the error adversely affects a substantial right of a party,’ or in other words, unless the ruling prejudiced the accused.” Smith v. State, 136 So. 3d 424, 435 (Miss. 2014) (quoting Young v. State, 99 So. 3d 159, 165 (Miss. 2012)). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2025“We do not reverse a conviction for an erroneous evidentiary ruling unless ‘the error adversely affects a substantial right of a party,’ or in other words, unless the ruling prejudiced the accused.” Smith v. State, 136 So. 3d 424, 435 (Miss. 2014) (quoting Young v. State, 99 So. 3d 159, 165 (Miss. 2012)). | 1 | 1 |
Selman v. Selmangreen1 sentence2024Here, the chancellor explained his findings in detail and appropriately classified the property as marital pursuant to Hemsley “and conducted a detailed analysis of all the Ferguson factors in distributing the marital property.” See Randolph, 199 So. 3d at 1287 (¶18) (citing Selman v. Selman, 722 So. 2d 547, 554 (¶29) (Miss. 1998) (stating reversal is warranted “only where the failure to make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law constitute[s] manifest error.”))). | 1 | 1 |
Betty Rebecca Randolph v. Daniel Lee Randolphgreen1 sentence2024Here, the chancellor explained his findings in detail and appropriately classified the property as marital pursuant to Hemsley “and conducted a detailed analysis of all the Ferguson factors in distributing the marital property.” See Randolph, 199 So. 3d at 1287 (¶18) (citing Selman v. Selman, 722 So. 2d 547, 554 (¶29) (Miss. 1998) (stating reversal is warranted “only where the failure to make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law constitute[s] manifest error.”))). | 1 | 1 |
Kenneth W. Wheat, Cross-Appellant v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Cross-Appelleesgreen1 sentence2023The court found that Wheat v. Thigpen, 793 F.2d 621, 630 (5th Cir. 1986), authorized retrospective competency hearings “where sufficient records are available to guarantee reliability.” In the present case, the court stated that Dr. Lott’s 2006 evaluation, the August 2006 ex parte pretrial hearing transcript, and the transcript from Thomas’ guilty- plea proceeding were sufficient under Mississippi law “to guarantee the reliability of the 2007, Richardson was still an assistant district attorney. | 1 | 1 |
Huseth v. Husethgreen1 sentence2023The supreme court noted that although “the chancellor did not conduct a detailed analysis of the Albright factors on the record[,] . . . she did state that she had weighed the factors.” Id. at 858 (¶36). | 1 | 1 |
TK Ex Rel. DK v. SIMPSON CTY. SCHOOL DIST.green1 sentence2021T.K., 846 So. 2d at 321 (¶32). | 1 | 1 |
Johnny Jerome Edwards v. Nancy Jewel Pierce Edwardsgreen1 sentence2017“All the factors are important, but the chancellor has the ultimate discretion to weigh the evidence the way he sees fit.” Edwards, 189 So.3d at 1286 (¶ 8) (citing Johnson v. Gray, 859 So.2d 1006, 1013-14 (¶ 36) (Miss. 2003)). ¶ 24. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Graygreen1 sentence2017“All the factors are important, but the chancellor has the ultimate discretion to weigh the evidence the way he sees fit.” Edwards, 189 So.3d at 1286 (¶ 8) (citing Johnson v. Gray, 859 So.2d 1006, 1013-14 (¶ 36) (Miss. 2003)). ¶ 24. | 1 | 1 |
William T. Brantley v. City of Horn Lake, Mississippired1 sentence2015See Brantley v. Horn Lake, 152 So.3d 1106 (Miss.2014). | 1 | 1 |
ROYER HOMES OF MS., INC. v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc.green1 sentence2013In Royer Homes of Mississippi, Inc. v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc., 857 So.2d 748, 751-53 (¶¶ 7-11) (Miss.2003), the court held: The question of law/question of fact dichotomy requires a two-step inquiry in contract law. | 1 | 1 |
Bresnahan v. Bresnahangreen1 sentence2007In a division of property, the court must consider the economic contributions made by each party to the marriage, "both in terms of actual money earned and in terms of service without compensation such as domestic duties." Bresnahan v. Bresnahan, 818 So.2d 1113, 1119 (¶ 13) (Miss.2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Albright v. Albrightgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Caldwell & Gregory, Inc. v. UNIV. OF SO. MS.
green
2 sentences2008Div. of Medicaid, 853 So.2d 1192 (Miss.2003); and Caldwell & Gregory, Inc. v. Univ. of S. Miss., 716 So.2d 1120 (Miss.Ct.App.1998)," *605 also adding that the "agreements between [MSU] and [Iams] . . . contain confidentiality provisions." Thereafter, PETA filed an "Objection to MSU's Privilege Log," arguing that "the [c]ourt should require MSU and Iams to provide a more detailed privilege log, including specificity as to which items in each document are exempt and which are not. . . ." ¶ 17. 2008Div. of Medicaid, 853 So.2d 1192 (Miss.2003); and Caldwell & Gregory, Inc. v. Univ. of S. Miss., 716 So.2d 1120 (Miss.Ct.App.1998),” also adding that the “agreements between [MSU] and [lams] ... contain confidentiality provisions.” Thereafter, PETA filed an “Objection to MSU’s Privilege Log,” arguing that “the [c]ourt should require MSU and lams to provide a more detailed privilege log, including specificity as to which items in each document are exempt and which are not.... ” ¶ 17. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Electronic Data Sys. Corp. v. MS DIV. OF MEDICAID
green
2 sentences2008Div. of Medicaid, 853 So.2d 1192 (Miss.2003); and Caldwell & Gregory, Inc. v. Univ. of S. Miss., 716 So.2d 1120 (Miss.Ct.App.1998)," *605 also adding that the "agreements between [MSU] and [Iams] . . . contain confidentiality provisions." Thereafter, PETA filed an "Objection to MSU's Privilege Log," arguing that "the [c]ourt should require MSU and Iams to provide a more detailed privilege log, including specificity as to which items in each document are exempt and which are not. . . ." ¶ 17. 2008Div. of Medicaid, 853 So.2d 1192 (Miss.2003); and Caldwell & Gregory, Inc. v. Univ. of S. Miss., 716 So.2d 1120 (Miss.Ct.App.1998),” also adding that the “agreements between [MSU] and [lams] ... contain confidentiality provisions.” Thereafter, PETA filed an “Objection to MSU’s Privilege Log,” arguing that “the [c]ourt should require MSU and lams to provide a more detailed privilege log, including specificity as to which items in each document are exempt and which are not.... ” ¶ 17. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Neil v. Biggers
green
2 sentences2007Essentially, Givens gives a detailed analysis as to the five factors outlined in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972), which a trial court should consider in determining whether an in-court identification has been impermissibly tainted by law enforcement investigatory identification procedures. 2007Essentially, Givens gives a detailed analysis as to the five factors outlined in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972), which a trial court should consider in determining whether an in-court identification has been impermissibly tainted by law enforcement investigatory identification procedures. | 2 | 2005–2007 |
Tucker v. Tucker
green
2 sentences1996Tucker v. Tucker, 453 So.2d 1294 (Miss. 1984). 1994Tucker v. Tucker, 453 So. 2d 1294 (Miss. 1984). | 2 | 1994–1996 |
Armstrong v. Armstrong
green
1 sentence2021Because the court found that India’s allegations of domestic violence were not credible and granted the divorce to BJ, the court 4 A detailed analysis of the chancellor’s Albright findings can be found below in the discussion of Issue 5. 5 See Armstrong v. Armstrong, 618 So. 2d 1278 (Miss. 1993). 6 denied India’s request for attorneys’ fees. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Sarti v. Salt Creek Ltd.
green
2 sentences2014A most detailed analysis of the type of evidence required in food-poisoning cases is found in Sarti v. Salt Creek Ltd., 167 Cal.App.4th 1187 , 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 506 (2009). 2014A most detailed analysis of the type of evidence required in food-poisoning cases is found in Sarti v. Salt Creek Ltd., 167 Cal.App.4th 1187 , 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 506 (2009). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Minder v. Cielito Lindo Restaurant
green
2 sentences2014In that case, a panel of the California Court of Appeals was deciding whether to follow the rationale of a different panel in Minder v. Cielito Lindo Restaurant, 67 Cal.App.3d 1003 , 136 Cal.Rptr. 915 (1977). 2014In that case, a panel of the California Court of Appeals was deciding whether to follow the rationale of a different panel in Minder v. Cielito Lindo Restaurant, 67 Cal.App.3d 1003 , 136 Cal.Rptr. 915 (1977). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Scoggins v. Ellzey Beverages, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014In Scoggins, 743 So.2d at 994 , the trial court provided a detailed analysis of the lesser sanctions available and why the sanctions would not deter discovery abuse in that case. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Phillips v. State
green
2 sentences2012In denying instruction D-8, the trial judge cited Turner v. State, 773 So.2d 952 (Miss.Ct.App.2000), and Phillips, 794 So.2d 1034 . 2012In denying instruction D-8, the trial judge cited Turner v. State, 773 So.2d 952 (Miss.Ct.App.2000), and Phillips, 794 So.2d 1034 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Turner v. State
green
2 sentences2012In denying instruction D-8, the trial judge cited Turner v. State, 773 So.2d 952 (Miss.Ct.App.2000), and Phillips, 794 So.2d 1034 . 2012In denying instruction D-8, the trial judge cited Turner v. State, 773 So.2d 952 (Miss.Ct.App.2000), and Phillips, 794 So.2d 1034 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Chatman v. State
green
1 sentence2009Ross argues that even if his instruction was covered in instruction C-l, under Chatman v. State, 761 So.2d 851 (Miss.2000), he is entitled to a more detailed instruction because witness credibility was an issue in this case. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Hoops v. State
green
1 sentence2007"Any person who is present at the commission of a criminal offense and aids, counsels, or encourages another in the commission of that offense is an `aider and abettor' and is equally guilty with the principal offender." Hoops v. State , 681 So.2d 521 , 533 (Miss. 1996). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| Hoggatt v. Hoggatt green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Tome v. United States green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Marion Francis Fountain and Roosevelt Tremble v. United States of America, Eugene J. Marshall v. United States green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Hall v. Hilbun green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Blockburger v. United States green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Warren v. State green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Cook v. State green | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.