52 New Jersey opinions name it 4 courts 1963–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rendine v. Pantzergreen2 sentences2026Although we review a trial court's decision granting or denying a fee application with the understanding it "will be disturbed only on the rarest occasions, and then only because of a clear abuse of discretion." In re A.D., 259 N.J. 337 , 351 (2024) (quoting Rendine v. Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292, 317 (1995)), we are constrained to vacate the March 10, 2023 order awarding attorneys' fees, costs and interest, and remand for a detailed analysis as to whether petitioner is entitled to attorneys' fees and costs. 2021The trial court, however, engaged in a detailed analysis of the reasonableness of plaintiff's counsel's rate and the number of hours expended pursuant to Rendine v. Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292, 334-35 (1995), and we see no reason to disturb its conclusions. | 2 | 2 |
Borough of Saddle River v. Bobinskigreen2 sentences2009Borough of Saddle River v. Bobinski, 108 N.J.Super. 6, 16 , 259 A.2d 727, 732-33 (Ch.Div.1969). 2009Borough of Saddle River v. Bobinski, 108 N.J.Super. 6, 16 , 259 A.2d 727, 732-33 (Ch.Div.1969). | 2 | 2 |
Boller Beverages, Inc. v. Davisgreen2 sentences1987See Boller Beverages Inc. v. Davis, 38 N.J. 138, 151-152 (1962). 1987See Boller Beverages Inc. v. Davis, 38 N.J. 138, 151-152 (1962). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hendersongreen2 sentences2017If the court finds that the identification is reliable despite the impermissibly suggestive nature of the procedure, the identification may be admitted into evidence. 2 In State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208, 288 (2011), our Supreme Court revised Madison's two-prong test, articulating a more detailed framework to be applied "to future cases only." Id. at 302 . 2017If the court finds that the identification is reliable despite the impermissibly suggestive nature of the procedure, the identification may be admitted into evidence. 2 In State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208, 288 (2011), our Supreme Court revised Madison's two-prong test, articulating a more detailed framework to be applied "to future cases only." Id. at 302 . | 1 | 3 |
Imo Registrant N.B. (073613)green2 sentences2021After a detailed analysis of the statute's legislative history to resolve ambiguity because there is not an "and" or an "or" between "no more than one victim" and "no more than one occurrence," the Court "conclude[d] that the Legislature intended the household/incest exception to apply to a registrant whose single conviction otherwise meets the requirements of N.J.S.A. 2C:7-13(d)(2) and involves more than one instance of sexual contact with a single victim who is within his or her household." Id. at 102 (emphasis added). 2020Id. at 102 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Cottogreen1 sentence2025Therefore, we hold that the trial court did not commit error, much less plain error, when it instructed the jury on identification. [Cotto, 182 N.J. at 326-27 (citations reformatted).] Here, as in Cotto and Davis, the court provided the jury with the general jury charge that the State bore the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was the wrongdoer; in other words, that he murdered Rojas. | 1 | 1 |
Newburgh v. Arrigogreen1 sentence2020Addressing the son's college expenses, the judge similarly went through a detailed analysis of the child's needs and the factors set forth in Newburgh v. Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529, 544 (1982), and determined how those expenses should be paid by the parties. | 1 | 1 |
In re A.N.green1 sentence2019A-3898-17T4 9 [In re A.N., 430 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Tiernan v. Carasaljo Pinesgreen1 sentence2019Relying on Tiernan v. Carasaljo Pines, 51 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Venino v. Borough of Carlstadtgreen1 sentence2018“Evidence of comparable sales is effective in determining value only where there is a substantial similarity between the properties.” Venino v. Carlstadt Borough, 1 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Madisongreen2 sentences2017Although defendant's pro se brief relies on Henderson, "[b]ecause the events underlying this case arose before the Henderson decision was handed down, the guidelines established in Manson/Madison are applicable to this matter." State v. Jones, 224 N.J. 70 , 86 n.1 (2016). 9 A-3867-05T4 [ Madison, supra, 109 N.J. at 232 (citations omitted).] "Reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony[.]" Micelli, supra, 215 N.J. at 292 (quoting Manson, supra, 432 U.S. at 114 , 97 S. Ct. at 2253 , 53 L. 2017Although defendant's pro se brief relies on Henderson, "[b]ecause the events underlying this case arose before the Henderson decision was handed down, the guidelines established in Manson/Madison are applicable to this matter." State v. Jones, 224 N.J. 70 , 86 n.1 (2016). 9 A-3867-05T4 [ Madison, supra, 109 N.J. at 232 (citations omitted).] "Reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony[.]" Micelli, supra, 215 N.J. at 292 (quoting Manson, supra, 432 U.S. at 114 , 97 S. Ct. at 2253 , 53 L. | 1 | 1 |
Charles Gendler & Co. v. Telecom Equipment Corp.green2 sentences2010See Charles Gendler, supra, 102 N.J. at 482 , 508 A. 2d 1127 ("We recognize that the nature of the injury is relevant to the jurisdictional inquiry."). [14] Given this detailed standard, taken from Charles Gendler, we are at a loss at how the dissent can claim that the majority has created "a new test that consists of but one inquiry: whether a product has found its way here." Infra at 83, 987 A. 2d at 595 . 2010See Charles Gendler, supra, 102 N.J. at 482 , 508 A. 2d 1127 ("We recognize that the nature of the injury is relevant to the jurisdictional inquiry."). [14] Given this detailed standard, taken from Charles Gendler, we are at a loss at how the dissent can claim that the majority has created "a new test that consists of but one inquiry: whether a product has found its way here." Infra at 83, 987 A. 2d at 595 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Herreragreen2 sentences2007See State v. Herrera, supra, 187 N.J. at 509-10 , 902 A. 2d 177 . [6] For example, in State v. Ledbetter *598 the Connecticut Supreme Court required a detailed instruction on suggestivity where victim was not told "that the perpetrator may or may not be present" in the procedure. 2007See State v. Herrera, supra, 187 N.J. at 509-10 , 902 A. 2d 177 . [6] For example, in State v. Ledbetter *598 the Connecticut Supreme Court required a detailed instruction on suggestivity where victim was not told "that the perpetrator may or may not be present" in the procedure. | 1 | 1 |
Janet Grebin v. Sioux Falls Independent School District No. 49-5, John W. Harris, H.C. Rustad, Ronald L. Becker and Arnold L. Bauergreen1 sentence1998No. 49-5, 779 F.2d 18, 20 (8th Cir.1985) (“McDonnell Douglas was not a jury case and its ritual is not well suited as a detailed instruction to the jury”). | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Fabritex Mills, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Serranogreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Serranogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Marschall v. Marschallgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re the Marriage of Hudsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kelly v. Civil Service Commissiongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| Robert KEHOE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., Defendant-Appellantgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State in the Interest of J.F.
green
2 sentences2018In J.F., we undertook a detailed analysis of the revised waiver statute and affirmed the trial court's denial of a waiver request involving a murder allegedly A-4224-16T4 9 committed by a fourteen-year-old minor. 446 N.J. 2018In J.F. , we undertook a detailed analysis of the revised waiver statute and affirmed a trial court's denial of a waiver request involving a murder allegedly committed by a fourteen-year-old child. 446 N.J. | 3 | 2018–2018 |
State v. O'BRIEN
green
2 sentences2013Ibid. 2011Furthermore, "[b]ecause the rule is silent regarding the kinds of considerations that should inform such a determination," the Court referred the matter "the Civil and Criminal Practice Committees for consideration of a more detailed standard to guide judges in exercising their discretion." Ibid. | 2 | 2011–2013 |
S & S v. Zoning Bd. for Stratford
green
2 sentences2009In S & S v. Zoning Bd. for Stratford, 373 N.J.Super. 603 , 862 A.2d 1204 (App.Div.2004), the court detailed the test of abandonment: Abandonment of a nonconforming use terminates the right to its further use. 2009In S & S v. Zoning Bd. for Stratford, 373 N.J.Super. 603 , 862 A.2d 1204 (App.Div.2004), the court detailed the test of abandonment: Abandonment of a nonconforming use terminates the right to its further use. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Green
green
1 sentence2024Id. at 327 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Berkson v. Gogo LLC
green
1 sentence2021For example, a scrollwrap agreement "requires users to physically scroll through an internet agreement and click on a separate 'I agree' button in order to assent to the terms and conditions of the host website." Id. at 395 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Howard Jones(073827)
green
1 sentence2017Although defendant's pro se brief relies on Henderson, "[b]ecause the events underlying this case arose before the Henderson decision was handed down, the guidelines established in Manson/Madison are applicable to this matter." State v. Jones, 224 N.J. 70 , 86 n.1 (2016). 9 A-3867-05T4 [ Madison, supra, 109 N.J. at 232 (citations omitted).] "Reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony[.]" Micelli, supra, 215 N.J. at 292 (quoting Manson, supra, 432 U.S. at 114 , 97 S. Ct. at 2253 , 53 L. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Manson v. Brathwaite
green
2 sentences2017Although defendant's pro se brief relies on Henderson, "[b]ecause the events underlying this case arose before the Henderson decision was handed down, the guidelines established in Manson/Madison are applicable to this matter." State v. Jones, 224 N.J. 70 , 86 n.1 (2016). 9 A-3867-05T4 [ Madison, supra, 109 N.J. at 232 (citations omitted).] "Reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony[.]" Micelli, supra, 215 N.J. at 292 (quoting Manson, supra, 432 U.S. at 114 , 97 S. Ct. at 2253 , 53 L. 2017Although defendant's pro se brief relies on Henderson, "[b]ecause the events underlying this case arose before the Henderson decision was handed down, the guidelines established in Manson/Madison are applicable to this matter." State v. Jones, 224 N.J. 70 , 86 n.1 (2016). 9 A-3867-05T4 [ Madison, supra, 109 N.J. at 232 (citations omitted).] "Reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony[.]" Micelli, supra, 215 N.J. at 292 (quoting Manson, supra, 432 U.S. at 114 , 97 S. Ct. at 2253 , 53 L. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Pillar
green
2 sentences2017Like the officers' promise in Pillar, the assurances defendant would not go to jail presented an overwhelming enticement to admit 13 A-2878-14T3 criminal activity without fear of incarceration, and "clearly had the likelihood of stripping defendant of his 'capacity for self- determination,'" Pillar, supra, 359 N.J. 2017Like the officers' promise in Pillar, the assurances defendant would not go to jail presented an overwhelming enticement to admit 13 A-2878-14T3 criminal activity without fear of incarceration, and "clearly had the likelihood of stripping defendant of his 'capacity for self- determination,'" Pillar, supra, 359 N.J. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Santino J. Micelli (070453)
green
1 sentence2017Although defendant's pro se brief relies on Henderson, "[b]ecause the events underlying this case arose before the Henderson decision was handed down, the guidelines established in Manson/Madison are applicable to this matter." State v. Jones, 224 N.J. 70 , 86 n.1 (2016). 9 A-3867-05T4 [ Madison, supra, 109 N.J. at 232 (citations omitted).] "Reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony[.]" Micelli, supra, 215 N.J. at 292 (quoting Manson, supra, 432 U.S. at 114 , 97 S. Ct. at 2253 , 53 L. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Nicastro v. McIntyre MacHinery America, Ltd.
green
1 sentence2010See Charles Gendler, supra, 102 N.J. at 482 , 508 A. 2d 1127 ("We recognize that the nature of the injury is relevant to the jurisdictional inquiry."). [14] Given this detailed standard, taken from Charles Gendler, we are at a loss at how the dissent can claim that the majority has created "a new test that consists of but one inquiry: whether a product has found its way here." Infra at 83, 987 A. 2d at 595 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Ledbetter
green
2 sentences2007State v. Ledbetter, 275 Conn. 534, 579 , 881 A. 2d 290 (2005) (emphasis added). [7] The Ledbetter Court concluded that in circumstances like those before us, the instruction should include a charge to the effect that: In this case, the state has presented evidence that an eyewitness identified the defendant in connection with the crime charged. 2007State v. Ledbetter, 275 Conn. 534, 579 , 881 A. 2d 290 (2005) (emphasis added). [7] The Ledbetter Court concluded that in circumstances like those before us, the instruction should include a charge to the effect that: In this case, the state has presented evidence that an eyewitness identified the defendant in connection with the crime charged. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.
green
1 sentence2006A Both parties find support for their respective positions in Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc., 653 F. 2d 746 (2d Cir.1981). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. MEHLMAN
green
2 sentences2000Indeed, at the beginning of his testimony on the subject of highest and best use, Welsh said: "Traditionally, highest and best use analysis has been associated with land residual analysis, and basically the highest land value that is indicated represents the use which is the highest and best use." In New Jersey, "a court will not permit an expert to testify to the value of vacant land based on the projected income which could be earned from the operation of a building which might be erected thereon, because such a valuation is too speculative." State v. F & J Partnership, 250 N.J.Super. 19, 26 2000Indeed, at the beginning of his testimony on the subject of highest and best use, Welsh said: "Traditionally, highest and best use analysis has been associated with land residual analysis, and basically the highest land value that is indicated represents the use which is the highest and best use." In New Jersey, "a court will not permit an expert to testify to the value of vacant land based on the projected income which could be earned from the operation of a building which might be erected thereon, because such a valuation is too speculative." State v. F & J Partnership, 250 N.J.Super. 19, 26 | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State by Com'r of Transp. v. F & J.
green
2 sentences2000Indeed, at the beginning of his testimony on the subject of highest and best use, Welsh said: "Traditionally, highest and best use analysis has been associated with land residual analysis, and basically the highest land value that is indicated represents the use which is the highest and best use." In New Jersey, "a court will not permit an expert to testify to the value of vacant land based on the projected income which could be earned from the operation of a building which might be erected thereon, because such a valuation is too speculative." State v. F & J Partnership, 250 N.J.Super. 19, 26 2000Indeed, at the beginning of his testimony on the subject of highest and best use, Welsh said: "Traditionally, highest and best use analysis has been associated with land residual analysis, and basically the highest land value that is indicated represents the use which is the highest and best use." In New Jersey, "a court will not permit an expert to testify to the value of vacant land based on the projected income which could be earned from the operation of a building which might be erected thereon, because such a valuation is too speculative." State v. F & J Partnership, 250 N.J.Super. 19, 26 | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Coalition of New Jersey Sportsmen v. Florio
green
1 sentence2000For these reasons, misuse of toy guns presents a real hazard and a problem that needs to be addressed.' [ Coalition, supra, 744 F.Supp. at 607 (quoting 134 Cong. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
At & T Management Pension Plan v. Tucker
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 1176 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Farmland Dairy Farms, Inc. green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| State v. Jordan green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| State v. Kociolek green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| TRETINA PRINTING v. Fitzpatrick neutral | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Brown green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Marshall green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| State v. Dancyger green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Bakeries v. Commissioner green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Dancyger v. New Jersey green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Smith v. Industrial Accident Commission green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc. green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Procunier v. Martinez red | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Ramseur green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Humanik green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Humanik green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax Appeals green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| May v. Anderson green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| In Re Marriage of Leonard green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Shaffer v. Heitner green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| McAtee v. McAtee green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Helmsley v. Borough of Fort Lee green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Helmsley v. Borough of Fort Lee green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Etkes v. Bartell Media Corp. green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.