9 Oregon opinions name it 3 courts 1978–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
STC Submarine, Inc. v. Department of Revenuegreen2 sentences2011Rather, it is `[t]hat reasonable and probable use that will support the highest present value as of the date of the appraisal.'" STC Submarine , 13 OTR at 18 (citation omitted). "[A]ny projected highest and best use must be supported by market data as well as a detailed analysis." Multnomah County v. Dept. of Rev ., 13 OTR 58 , 64 (1994) (citation omitted). 2011Rather, it is `[t]hat reasonable and probable use that will support the highest present value as of the date of the appraisal.'" STC Submarine , 13 OTR at 18 (citation omitted). "[A]ny projected highest and best use must be supported by market data as well as a detailed analysis." Multnomah County v. Dept. of Rev. , 13 OTR 58 , 64 (1994) (citation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Howell v. Boylegreen2 sentences2013Cite as 353 Or 359 (2013) 379 Instead, the dissent embarks on a detailed analysis of two earlier cases that the court in Hale cited—Noonan and Evanhoff—which the dissent reads as holding that the remedy clause is not violated when an alternative remedy remains available. 353 Or at 392-96 (De Muniz, J. pro tempore, dissenting). 2013Cite as 353 Or 359 (2013) 379 Instead, the dissent embarks on a detailed analysis of two earlier cases that the court in Hale cited—Noonan and Evanhoff—which the dissent reads as holding that the remedy clause is not violated when an alternative remedy remains available. 353 Or at 392-96 (De Muniz, J. pro tempore, dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Multnomah County v. Department of Revenue
neutral
2 sentences2011Rather, it is `[t]hat reasonable and probable use that will support the highest present value as of the date of the appraisal.'" STC Submarine , 13 OTR at 18 (citation omitted). "[A]ny projected highest and best use must be supported by market data as well as a detailed analysis." Multnomah County v. Dept. of Rev ., 13 OTR 58 , 64 (1994) (citation omitted). 2011Rather, it is `[t]hat reasonable and probable use that will support the highest present value as of the date of the appraisal.'" STC Submarine , 13 OTR at 18 (citation omitted). "[A]ny projected highest and best use must be supported by market data as well as a detailed analysis." Multnomah County v. Dept. of Rev. , 13 OTR 58 , 64 (1994) (citation omitted). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Sather v. Saif Corp.
green
1 sentence2015Whether an estate is such a person requires the more detailed analysis that we have Cite as 357 Or 122 (2015) 137 undertaken. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Matter of Marriage of McDonnal
green
1 sentence2013Despite the use of the word “shall” — a term also found in ORS 107.105(l)(f)(F)— the Supreme Court concluded that the parties could voluntarily obviate the court’s statutory obligation to conduct a detailed inquiry by presenting their own agreement to the court: “We do not read the statute to require the court to apply an analysis of the statutory factors to the circumstances of each case when confronted with a proposed agreement.” McDonnal, 293 Or at 778 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
White v. Jubitz Corp.
green
2 sentences2009White, 219 Or.App. at 74-75 , 182 P.3d 215 . 2009White, 219 Or App at 74-75 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Baker v. Foy
green
2 sentences1991In Baker v. Foy, 310 Or 221 , 797 P2d 349 (1990), the court detailed the analysis for determining whether service complied with ORCP 7D. 1991In Baker v. Foy, 310 Or 221 , 797 P2d 349 (1990), the court detailed the analysis for determining whether service complied with ORCP 7D. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Groda
green
2 sentences1979However, since Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 US 753 , 99 S Ct 2586 , 61 L Ed 2d 235 (1979); United States v. Chadwick, 433 US 1 , 97 S Ct 2476 , 53 L Ed 2d 538 (1977); and State v. Groda, 285 Or 321 , 591 P2d 1354 (1979), a more detailed analysis is required. 1979However, since Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 US 753 , 99 S Ct 2586 , 61 L Ed 2d 235 (1979); United States v. Chadwick, 433 US 1 , 97 S Ct 2476 , 53 L Ed 2d 538 (1977); and State v. Groda, 285 Or 321 , 591 P2d 1354 (1979), a more detailed analysis is required. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
United States v. Chadwick
red
2 sentences1979However, since Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 US 753 , 99 S Ct 2586 , 61 L Ed 2d 235 (1979); United States v. Chadwick, 433 US 1 , 97 S Ct 2476 , 53 L Ed 2d 538 (1977); and State v. Groda, 285 Or 321 , 591 P2d 1354 (1979), a more detailed analysis is required. 1979However, since Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 US 753 , 99 S Ct 2586 , 61 L Ed 2d 235 (1979); United States v. Chadwick, 433 US 1 , 97 S Ct 2476 , 53 L Ed 2d 538 (1977); and State v. Groda, 285 Or 321 , 591 P2d 1354 (1979), a more detailed analysis is required. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Arkansas v. Sanders
red
2 sentences1979However, since Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 US 753 , 99 S Ct 2586 , 61 L Ed 2d 235 (1979); United States v. Chadwick, 433 US 1 , 97 S Ct 2476 , 53 L Ed 2d 538 (1977); and State v. Groda, 285 Or 321 , 591 P2d 1354 (1979), a more detailed analysis is required. 1979However, since Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 US 753 , 99 S Ct 2586 , 61 L Ed 2d 235 (1979); United States v. Chadwick, 433 US 1 , 97 S Ct 2476 , 53 L Ed 2d 538 (1977); and State v. Groda, 285 Or 321 , 591 P2d 1354 (1979), a more detailed analysis is required. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. McWilliams
green
2 sentences1978State v. Leppanen, 253 Or 51, 53 , 453 P2d 172 (1969); State v. McWilliams, 29 Or App 101, 106 , 562 P2d 577 rev den (1977). 1978State v. Leppanen, 253 Or 51, 53 , 453 P2d 172 (1969); State v. McWilliams, 29 Or App 101, 106 , 562 P2d 577 rev den (1977). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Leppanen
green
2 sentences1978State v. Leppanen, 253 Or 51, 53 , 453 P2d 172 (1969); State v. McWilliams, 29 Or App 101, 106 , 562 P2d 577 rev den (1977). 1978State v. Leppanen, 253 Or 51, 53 , 453 P2d 172 (1969); State v. McWilliams, 29 Or App 101, 106 , 562 P2d 577 rev den (1977). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.