11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cahoon v. Cummingsgreen2 sentences2010Id. at 539 . 2002However, we note that this paragraph arguably injects an erroneous "but for" test into the causation analysis. [4] Although this Court has never directly confronted and answered whether the Act abrogates joint and several liability, I acknowledge that there exists dicta assuming its abrogation in Cahoon v. Cummings, 734 N.E.2d 535, 541 (Ind.2000). [5] In contrast to the Comparative Fault Act, the Indiana Products Liability Act explicitly abrogates the common law principle of joint and several liability in products liability cases. | 1 | 2 |
Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.green2 sentences1999See Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc., 141 Ariz. 597 , 688 P.2d 605, 616 (1984); Jones v. Montefiore Hospital, 494 Pa. 410 , 431 A.2d 920, 925 (1981). 1999See Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc., 141 Ariz. 597 , 688 P.2d 605, 616 (1984); Jones v. Montefiore Hospital, 494 Pa. 410 , 431 A.2d 920, 925 (1981). | 1 | 2 |
Mayhue v. Sparkmangreen1 sentence2000He argues that the trial court erred in applying the causation standard of Section 323 of the Restatement of Torts, which this Court endorsed in Mayhue v. Sparkman, 653 N.E.2d 1384, 1388-89 (Ind.1995). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Montefiore Hospitalgreen2 sentences1999See Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc., 141 Ariz. 597 , 688 P.2d 605, 616 (1984); Jones v. Montefiore Hospital, 494 Pa. 410 , 431 A.2d 920, 925 (1981). 1999See Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc., 141 Ariz. 597 , 688 P.2d 605, 616 (1984); Jones v. Montefiore Hospital, 494 Pa. 410 , 431 A.2d 920, 925 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Jablonski v. Inland Steel Co.green2 sentences1994See Jablonski v. Inland Steel Co. (1991), Ind.App., 575 N.E.2d 1039 , reh'g denied, trans. denied; Watson, 532 N.E.2d 1191 . 1994See Jablonski v. Inland Steel Co. (1991), Ind. App., 575 N.E.2d 1039 , reh'g denied, trans. denied; Watson, 532 N.E.2d 1191 . | 1 | 1 |
Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.red2 sentences1994See, e.g., Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 ; Lost Chance, supra. . 1994See, e.g., Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 ; Lost Chance, supra. . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 695215
green
1 sentence2026Corp., 53 F.3d 930 (8th Cir. 1995), the Eighth Circuit discussed the CERCLA framework and addressed the causation element. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
cluster 604129
green
1 sentence2026The court concluded that “in addition to imposing a strict liability scheme, CERCLA does away with a causation requirement.” Id. [35] Likewise, in Control Data Corp. v. S.C.S.C. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
green
2 sentences2011The Monell Court was also clear that § 1983 has a causation requirement, which precludes imposing upon a municipality vicarious liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior; that is, “a municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a tortfeasor.” Id. at 691, 98 S.Ct. 2018 (emphasis in original). 2011Rather, municipal liability lies only when the plaintiffs injury is caused by some municipal “policy or custom.” M at 694, 98 S.Ct. 2018 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Johnson v. Bender
green
1 sentence2006In the context of analyzing the proof required of a plaintiff alleging personal injuries, Johnson v. Bender, 174 Ind.App. 638, 644 , 369 N.E.2d 986 , 940 (1977), trans. denied, held that "The necessity of expert medical testimony to establish a causal connection generally depends upon the nature of the medical question involved. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Cahoon v. Cummings
green
1 sentence2000Ind.Code § 34-23-1-1 (1998). 1 The Court of Appeals held that the causation standard of Mayhue applied in the context of the wrongful death action, concluding that: “[T]he intent of the wrongful death statute was to allow an action to be brought by the decedent’s personal representative against a defendant who may be held legally hable for the death, regardless of the mechanism of liability.” Cahoon, 715 N.E.2d at 7 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. Sharp
green
1 sentence1994See, e.g., Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 ; Lost Chance, supra. [4] See, e.g., Murdoch v. Thomas (1981), Ala., 404 So.2d 580 ; Thompson v. Sun City Community Hosp., Inc. (1984), 141 Ariz. 597 , 688 P.2d 605 (following § 323 approach); Sharp v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (1985), Colo. App., 710 P.2d 1153 (rejecting Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 , and following § 323 approach), aff'd 741 P.2d 714 (1987); Richmond County Hosp. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Watson v. Medical Emergency Services, Corp.
green
2 sentences1994See Jablonski v. Inland Steel Co. (1991), Ind.App., 575 N.E.2d 1039 , reh'g denied, trans. denied; Watson, 532 N.E.2d 1191 . 1994See Jablonski v. Inland Steel Co. (1991), Ind. App., 575 N.E.2d 1039 , reh'g denied, trans. denied; Watson, 532 N.E.2d 1191 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Sharp v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
green
1 sentence1994See, e.g., Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 ; Lost Chance, supra. [4] See, e.g., Murdoch v. Thomas (1981), Ala., 404 So.2d 580 ; Thompson v. Sun City Community Hosp., Inc. (1984), 141 Ariz. 597 , 688 P.2d 605 (following § 323 approach); Sharp v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (1985), Colo. App., 710 P.2d 1153 (rejecting Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 , and following § 323 approach), aff'd 741 P.2d 714 (1987); Richmond County Hosp. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Murdoch v. Thomas
green
1 sentence1994See, e.g., Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 ; Lost Chance, supra. [4] See, e.g., Murdoch v. Thomas (1981), Ala., 404 So.2d 580 ; Thompson v. Sun City Community Hosp., Inc. (1984), 141 Ariz. 597 , 688 P.2d 605 (following § 323 approach); Sharp v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (1985), Colo. App., 710 P.2d 1153 (rejecting Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 , and following § 323 approach), aff'd 741 P.2d 714 (1987); Richmond County Hosp. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Chapman
green
1 sentence1993Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Chapman (1979), Ind.App., 388 N.E.2d 541, 555 , trans. denied. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Micinski v. State
green
1 sentence1986In Micinski v. State (1986), Ind., 487 N.E.2d 150 , the court rejected a causation analysis based upon the driver's intoxication. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.