78 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Lemongreen2 sentences1993Where there is nothing in the record to support the contention of error, there is nothing presented to this court for review.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Williams v. Lemon, 194 Ga. App. 249 (3) ( 390 SE2d 89 ) (1990). 1993Where there is nothing in the record to support the contention of error, there is nothing presented to this court for review.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Williams v. Lemon, 194 Ga. App. 249 (3) ( 390 SE2d 89 ) (1990). | 3 | 4 |
Brookhaven Associates v. DeKalb Countygreen2 sentences1989“When there is nothing in the record to support the contention of error, there is nothing presented to this court for review.” Brookhaven Assoc., 187 Ga. App. at 750-751 . 2. 1989“When there is nothing in the record to support the contention of error, there is nothing presented to this court for review. [Cit.]” Brookhaven Assoc. v. DeKalb County, 187 Ga. App. 749, 750-751 (371 *250 SE2d 231) (1988). | 3 | 4 |
Kellam v. Stategreen2 sentences2006(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Kellam v. State, 271 Ga. App. 125, 126-127 ( 608 SE2d 729 ) (2004). 2006(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Kellam v. State, 271 Ga. App. 125, 126-127 ( 608 SE2d 729 ) (2004). | 3 | 3 |
Wiggley v. Stategreen2 sentences1993Where there is nothing in the record to support the contention of error, there is nothing presented to this court for review.’ . . . [Cit.]” Wiggley v. State, 204 Ga. App. 583, 584 (2) ( 420 SE2d 82 ) (1992). 5. 1993Where there is nothing in the record to support the contention of error, there is nothing presented to this court for review.’ . . . [Cit.]” Wiggley v. State, 204 Ga. App. 583, 584 (2) ( 420 SE2d 82 ) (1992). 5. | 3 | 3 |
Ledford v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Ledford v. State, 289 Ga. 70, 85 (14) ( 709 SE2d 239 ) (2011) (ruling that “[e]ven where a defendant has failed to object or move for a mistrial in response to an alleged comment on the evidence by the trial court in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57, this Court nevertheless will examine the claim for plain error”) (citations and punctuation omitted). 2013Ledford v. State, 289 Ga. 70, 85 (14) ( 709 SE2d 239 ) (2011) (ruling that “[e]ven where a defendant has failed to object or move for a mistrial in response to an alleged comment on the evidence by the trial court in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57, this Court nevertheless will examine the claim for plain error”) (citations and punctuation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
White v. Plumbing Distributors, Inc.green2 sentences2004(Cits.)” (Punctuation omitted.) White v. Plumbing Distrib., 262 Ga. App. 228, 231 (3) ( 585 SE2d 135 ) (2003). 2004(Cits.)” (Punctuation omitted.) White v. Plumbing Distrib., 262 Ga. App. 228, 231 (3) ( 585 SE2d 135 ) (2003). | 2 | 2 |
Sun v. Bushgreen2 sentences1992Where there is nothing in the record to support a contention of error, nothing is presented to this court for review.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Sun v. Bush, 179 Ga. App. 80, 81 (4) ( 345 SE2d 85 ) (1986). 1992Where there is nothing in the record to support a contention of error, nothing is presented to this court for review.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Sun v. Bush, 179 Ga. App. 80, 81 (4) ( 345 SE2d 85 ) (1986). | 2 | 2 |
Morris v. Pulliamgreen2 sentences1989See Shells v. State, 168 Ga. App. 442 ( 309 SE2d 664 ) (1983). 1984See Shells v. State, 168 Ga. App. 442 ( 309 SE2d 664 ) (1983); Duckworth v. Collier, 164 Ga. App. 139 (1) ( 296 SE2d 640 ) (1982). 2. | 2 | 2 |
Shells v. Stategreen2 sentences1989See Shells v. State, 168 Ga. App. 442 ( 309 SE2d 664 ) (1983). 1984See Shells v. State, 168 Ga. App. 442 ( 309 SE2d 664 ) (1983); Duckworth v. Collier, 164 Ga. App. 139 (1) ( 296 SE2d 640 ) (1982). 2. | 2 | 2 |
Duckworth v. Colliergreen2 sentences2003We do point out, however, that White fails to cite to any such ruling in the record, and we find none. “ Where there is nothing in the record to support a contention of error, there is nothing to review.’ ” Duckworth v. Collier, 164 Ga. App. 139, 140 (1) ( 296 SE2d 640 ) (1982). 2003We do point out, however, that White fails to cite to any such ruling in the record, and we find none. “ Where there is nothing in the record to support a contention of error, there is nothing to review.’ ” Duckworth v. Collier, 164 Ga. App. 139, 140 (1) ( 296 SE2d 640 ) (1982). | 1 | 2 |
Crumbley v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See, e. g., Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611 (1) ( 409 SE2d 517 ) (1991) (“A sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow.”). 5 this contention of error, he seeks to have his sentence vacated and his case remanded for resentencing. 2026See, e. g., Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611 (1) ( 409 SE2d 517 ) (1991) (“A sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow.”). 5 this contention of error, he seeks to have his sentence vacated and his case remanded for resentencing. | 1 | 1 |
Triola v. Triolagreen2 sentences2026Further, we note that because the First Trial 7 See generally Triola v. Triola, 299 Ga. 220, 221 (1) ( 787 SE2d 206 ) (2016) (“It is beyond all reasonable dispute that [the judge] had no authority to sign the . . . order after the effective date of his resignation[.]”) (collecting cases); further, as the Second Trial Court found, once the judge of the First Trial Court judge returned with senior status, the chief judge had not sought her assistance with Harrington’s case because no judge had been disqualified or otherwise could not serve. 2026Further, we note that because the First Trial 7 See generally Triola v. Triola, 299 Ga. 220, 221 (1) ( 787 SE2d 206 ) (2016) (“It is beyond all reasonable dispute that [the judge] had no authority to sign the . . . order after the effective date of his resignation[.]”) (collecting cases); further, as the Second Trial Court found, once the judge of the First Trial Court judge returned with senior status, the chief judge had not sought her assistance with Harrington’s case because no judge had been disqualified or otherwise could not serve. | 1 | 1 |
Stockbridge Dental Group, P.C. v. Freemangreen2 sentences2024Hence, [Razavi] has waived and abandoned this assertion of error for purposes of appeal.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Stockbridge Dental Group v. Freeman, 316 Ga. App. 274, 275, n. 2 ( 728 SE2d 871 ) (2012). 7 Further, to the extent that Razavi also means to argue that the trial court erred in denying his claim of adverse possession over Emily’s property, Rasavi has not enumerated this contention as error. 2024Hence, [Razavi] has waived and abandoned this assertion of error for purposes of appeal.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Stockbridge Dental Group v. Freeman, 316 Ga. App. 274, 275, n. 2 ( 728 SE2d 871 ) (2012). 7 Further, to the extent that Razavi also means to argue that the trial court erred in denying his claim of adverse possession over Emily’s property, Rasavi has not enumerated this contention as error. | 1 | 1 |
White v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See White v. State, 319 Ga. 367, 380 (b) (i) (903 SE2d 891) (2024) (noting the trial court’s “implicit conclusion that the danger of unfair prejudice did not substantially outweigh the probative value of the evidence” pursuant to Rule 403). 2024See White v. State, 319 Ga. 367, 380 (b) (i) (903 SE2d 891) (2024) (noting the trial court’s “implicit conclusion that the danger of unfair prejudice did not substantially outweigh the probative value of the evidence” pursuant to Rule 403). | 1 | 1 |
Fradenburg v. Stategreen2 sentences2021“This court has no jurisdiction to consider grounds which though argued are not enumerated as error according to OCGA § 5-6-40.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Fradenburg v. State, 296 Ga. App. 860, 863 ( 676 SE2d 25 ) (2009). 4 rather than sexual, abuse, and that the evidence of Alvarado’s touching the victim’s chest and arms was thus insufficient to show intent and a substantial step toward the crime. 2021“This court has no jurisdiction to consider grounds which though argued are not enumerated as error according to OCGA § 5-6-40.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Fradenburg v. State, 296 Ga. App. 860, 863 ( 676 SE2d 25 ) (2009). 4 rather than sexual, abuse, and that the evidence of Alvarado’s touching the victim’s chest and arms was thus insufficient to show intent and a substantial step toward the crime. | 1 | 1 |
City of Atlanta v. Starkegreen2 sentences2016“When there is nothing in the record to support the contention of error, there is nothing presented to this court for review.” City of Atlanta v. Starke, 192 Ga. App. 267, 269 (1) (c) ( 384 SE2d 419 ) (1989) (citation and punctuation omitted). 2. 2016“When there is nothing in the record to support the contention of error, there is nothing presented to this court for review.” City of Atlanta v. Starke, 192 Ga. App. 267, 269 (1) (c) ( 384 SE2d 419 ) (1989) (citation and punctuation omitted). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Weyant v. MacIntyregreen2 sentences2008See Weyant v. MacIntyre, 211 Ga. App. 281, 283 (3) ( 438 SE2d 640 ) (1993) (defendant did not waive arbitration when he “asserted the arbitration clause in his answer and promptly moved to compel arbitration”); compare Griffis v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 268 Ga. App. 588 ( 602 SE2d 307 ) (2004) (finding waiver where defendants asserted a counterclaim, engaged in extensive discovery, and waited nine months before asserting their right to arbitration). 2008See Weyant v. MacIntyre, 211 Ga. App. 281, 283 (3) ( 438 SE2d 640 ) (1993) (defendant did not waive arbitration when he “asserted the arbitration clause in his answer and promptly moved to compel arbitration”); compare Griffis v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 268 Ga. App. 588 ( 602 SE2d 307 ) (2004) (finding waiver where defendants asserted a counterclaim, engaged in extensive discovery, and waited nine months before asserting their right to arbitration). | 1 | 1 |
Griffis v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.green2 sentences2008See Weyant v. MacIntyre, 211 Ga. App. 281, 283 (3) ( 438 SE2d 640 ) (1993) (defendant did not waive arbitration when he “asserted the arbitration clause in his answer and promptly moved to compel arbitration”); compare Griffis v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 268 Ga. App. 588 ( 602 SE2d 307 ) (2004) (finding waiver where defendants asserted a counterclaim, engaged in extensive discovery, and waited nine months before asserting their right to arbitration). 2008See Weyant v. MacIntyre, 211 Ga. App. 281, 283 (3) ( 438 SE2d 640 ) (1993) (defendant did not waive arbitration when he “asserted the arbitration clause in his answer and promptly moved to compel arbitration”); compare Griffis v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 268 Ga. App. 588 ( 602 SE2d 307 ) (2004) (finding waiver where defendants asserted a counterclaim, engaged in extensive discovery, and waited nine months before asserting their right to arbitration). | 1 | 1 |
Belcher v. Folsomgreen2 sentences2004“Where there is nothing in the record to support a contention of error, there is nothing to review.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Belcher v. Folsom, 258 Ga. App. 191, 192-193 ( 573 SE2d 447 ) (2002). 2004“Where there is nothing in the record to support a contention of error, there is nothing to review.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Belcher v. Folsom, 258 Ga. App. 191, 192-193 ( 573 SE2d 447 ) (2002). | 1 | 1 |
Atlanta Journal Co. v. Doyalgreen2 sentences2004In any event, with no evidence of bad faith of record, see Atlanta Journal Co. v. Doyal, 82 Ga. App. 321, 336 (5) ( 60 SE2d 802 ) (1950) (attorney fees for bad faith in actions sounding in tort refers to intentional rather than negligent conduct in transaction out of which cause of action arose), summary judgment *4 for the Restaurant upon Wilson’s bad faith attorney fees claim here was proper. 2004In any event, with no evidence of bad faith of record, see Atlanta Journal Co. v. Doyal, 82 Ga. App. 321, 336 (5) ( 60 SE2d 802 ) (1950) (attorney fees for bad faith in actions sounding in tort refers to intentional rather than negligent conduct in transaction out of which cause of action arose), summary judgment *4 for the Restaurant upon Wilson’s bad faith attorney fees claim here was proper. | 1 | 1 |
| Howard Motor Co. v. Swintgreen | 1 | 1 |
Freeman v. Stategreen2 sentences1995See also Freeman v. State, 264 Ga. 27 ( 440 SE2d 181 ) (1994) (where a murder charge was placed on the dead docket in return for a statement and testimony against another defendant); and State v. Marcus, 206 Ga. App. 385 ( 425 SE2d 351 ) (1992) (where a case was removed from the dead docket and returned to active status). 4 The contention of error in refusing to charge the jury on the need for corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony is dependent on the evidence at trial. 1995See also Freeman v. State, 264 Ga. 27 ( 440 SE2d 181 ) (1994) (where a murder charge was placed on the dead docket in return for a statement and testimony against another defendant); and State v. Marcus, 206 Ga. App. 385 ( 425 SE2d 351 ) (1992) (where a case was removed from the dead docket and returned to active status). 4 The contention of error in refusing to charge the jury on the need for corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony is dependent on the evidence at trial. | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Cobbgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Brown v. Thomasgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Singleton v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Eidson v. Maddoxgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ekstedt v. CHARTER MEDICAL CORPORATIONgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Union Camp Corp. v. Helmygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Howell Mill/Collier Associates v. Gonzalesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Powell v. Barkergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Meason v. Gilbertgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Brown v. Techdata Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| Venenga v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Jackson v. Springfieldgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Wright Associates, Inc. v. Riedergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Haskins v. Jonesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Barron v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Aldridge v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Taurus Productions, Inc. v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Alexander v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
BLEVINS v. the STATE.
green
2 sentences2018"We review this contention of error for abuse of discretion." Blevins v. State , 343 Ga. App. 539 , 541 (1), 808 S.E.2d 740 (2017). 2018"We review this contention of error for abuse of discretion." Blevins v. State , 343 Ga. App. 539 , 541 (1), 808 S.E.2d 740 (2017). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Steele v. State
green
2 sentences2017Steele v. State , 337 Ga. App. 562 , 565-566 (3), 788 S.E.2d 145 (2016). 3 OCGA § 24-4-414 (a) provides that: "In a criminal proceeding in which the accused is accused of an offense of child molestation, evidence of the accused's commission of another offense of child molestation shall be *542 admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant." (emphasis supplied). 2017Steele v. State , 337 Ga. App. 562 , 565-566 (3), 788 S.E.2d 145 (2016). 3 OCGA § 24-4-414 (a) provides that: "In a criminal proceeding in which the accused is accused of an offense of child molestation, evidence of the accused's commission of another offense of child molestation shall be *542 admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant." (emphasis supplied). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Where a party has suffered an adverse judgment in a manner contrary to basic tenants of due process, “it is no answer to say that in [Green Tree’s] particular case due process of law would have led to the same result because [it] had no adequate defense upon the merits. . . . [O]nly wiping the slate clean [restores Green Tree] to the 11 position [it] would have occupied had due process of law been accorded to [it] in the first place.” Peralta, 485 U. S. at 86 - 87 (citation and punctuation omitted). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Ross v. State
green
2 sentences2004(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Ross v. State, 214 Ga. App. 385 ( 448 SE2d 52 ) (1994). 2004(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Ross v. State, 214 Ga. App. 385 ( 448 SE2d 52 ) (1994). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2003We upheld the admission of atomic absorption test results against a contention the test was scientifically unreliable in Jones v. State, 273 Ga. 231 (12) ( 539 SE2d 154 ) (2000), where there was no expert evidence that the test was considered unreliable. 2003We upheld the admission of atomic absorption test results against a contention the test was scientifically unreliable in Jones v. State, 273 Ga. 231 (12) ( 539 SE2d 154 ) (2000), where there was no expert evidence that the test was considered unreliable. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Hershiser v. Yorkshire Condominium Ass'n
green
2 sentences1998Turning to the merits of Pierce’s assertion that the affidavit should not have been considered by the trial court, we find Hershiser v. Yorkshire Condominium Assn., 201 Ga. App. 185 (1) ( 410 SE2d 455 ) (1991) and Gunter v. Hamilton Bank &c., 201 Ga. App. 379 ( 411 SE2d 115 ) (1991) controlling. 1998Turning to the merits of Pierce’s assertion that the affidavit should not have been considered by the trial court, we find Hershiser v. Yorkshire Condominium Assn., 201 Ga. App. 185 (1) ( 410 SE2d 455 ) (1991) and Gunter v. Hamilton Bank &c., 201 Ga. App. 379 ( 411 SE2d 115 ) (1991) controlling. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Gunter v. Hamilton Bank
green
2 sentences1998Turning to the merits of Pierce’s assertion that the affidavit should not have been considered by the trial court, we find Hershiser v. Yorkshire Condominium Assn., 201 Ga. App. 185 (1) ( 410 SE2d 455 ) (1991) and Gunter v. Hamilton Bank &c., 201 Ga. App. 379 ( 411 SE2d 115 ) (1991) controlling. 1998Turning to the merits of Pierce’s assertion that the affidavit should not have been considered by the trial court, we find Hershiser v. Yorkshire Condominium Assn., 201 Ga. App. 185 (1) ( 410 SE2d 455 ) (1991) and Gunter v. Hamilton Bank &c., 201 Ga. App. 379 ( 411 SE2d 115 ) (1991) controlling. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence1997Id. at 60-61 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Marcus
green
2 sentences1995See also Freeman v. State, 264 Ga. 27 ( 440 SE2d 181 ) (1994) (where a murder charge was placed on the dead docket in return for a statement and testimony against another defendant); and State v. Marcus, 206 Ga. App. 385 ( 425 SE2d 351 ) (1992) (where a case was removed from the dead docket and returned to active status). 4 The contention of error in refusing to charge the jury on the need for corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony is dependent on the evidence at trial. 1995See also Freeman v. State, 264 Ga. 27 ( 440 SE2d 181 ) (1994) (where a murder charge was placed on the dead docket in return for a statement and testimony against another defendant); and State v. Marcus, 206 Ga. App. 385 ( 425 SE2d 351 ) (1992) (where a case was removed from the dead docket and returned to active status). 4 The contention of error in refusing to charge the jury on the need for corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony is dependent on the evidence at trial. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Miranda v. Arizona green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| 0-1 Doctors Memorial Holding Co. v. Moore green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Jackson v. Virginia red | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| North Carolina National Bank v. Evans green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Potomac Leasing Co. v. Thrasher green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| City Dodge, Inc. v. Gardner green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Smith v. State green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Patterson v. State green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Wisecup v. State neutral | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Montgomery v. State green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Allen v. United States green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| Attaway v. Duncan green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| Hilley v. FINANCE AMERICA CORPORATION OF GEORGIA green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| Gould v. State green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Taylor v. Louisiana green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| State v. Gould green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Roth v. State neutral | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Cameron v. American Can Co. green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Waters v. State green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Hix v. Headrick green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crane green | 1 | 1962–1962 |
| Ladson Motor Company v. Croft green | 1 | 1962–1962 |
| Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cox green | 1 | 1962–1962 |
| Jones v. Hutchins green | 1 | 1961–1961 |
| Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co. green | 1 | 1960–1960 |
| Palmer Brick Co. v. Chenall green | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.