50 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1939–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
JS v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See J.S. v. State, 717 So.2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). 2001See J.S. v. State, 717 So.2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). | 2 | 2 |
Mordica v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Also, in Mordica v. State, 618 So.2d 301 , 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), the First District rejected the contention that the doctrine of transferred intent is applicable only where the defendant entirely misses the intended victim and hits the unintended victim. 2017Also, in Mordica v. State, 618 So.2d 301, 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), the First District rejected the contention that the doctrine of transferred intent is applicable only where the defendant entirely misses the intended victim and hits the unintended victim. | 1 | 2 |
United States v. Derrick Myran Frankson, (Two Cases)green2 sentences2007Rejecting the contention that the warnings were insufficient "for not specifically mentioning that the right to an attorney applies both `prior to interrogation' and `during the interrogation,'" the court held that the warnings "communicated to [the defendant] that his right to an attorney began immediately and continued forward in time without qualification." Id. at 82. 2007Rejecting the contention that the warnings were insufficient “for not specifically mentioning that the right to an attorney applies both ‘prior to interrogation’ and ‘during the interrogation,’ ” the court held that the warnings “communicated to [the defendant] that his right to an attorney began immediately and continued forward in time without qualification.” Id. at 82 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Greengreen1 sentence2016Id. at 1006 (“[T]he justification to conduct such a warrantless search does not vanish once the car has been immobilized.” (quoting Michigan v. Thomas, 458 U.S. 259, 261 , 102 S.Ct. 3079 , 73 L.Ed.2d 750 (1982))). | 1 | 1 |
Wilkerson v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Wilkerson v. State, 128 So.3d 189, 189-90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Pearson v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Pearson v. State, 867 So.2d 517, 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Weitz v. State, 795 So.2d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Hubbard v. State, 662 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Weitz v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Pearson v. State, 867 So.2d 517, 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Weitz v. State, 795 So.2d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Hubbard v. State, 662 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-1 v. Peltgreen1 sentence2012See Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-1 v. Pelt, 84 So.3d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Steinhorst v. Stategreen1 sentence2010To be preserved for appellate review, “an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985); see also Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Tillman v. Stategreen1 sentence2010To be preserved for appellate review, “an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985); see also Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Florida v. JLgreen1 sentence2008See id. at 272, 120 S.Ct. 1375 . | 1 | 1 |
Ash v. Reillygreen1 sentence2006See Davis, 562 So.2d at 433 . [3] Like the Abd-Rahmaan court, we too have found only the one federal district court case of Ash v. Reilly, 354 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004), holding that Crawford is applicable in revocation proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
Amendments to the Florida Evidence Codegreen1 sentence2006See generally Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code, 891 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 2004). [2] We reject the latter contention because the rule argued by appellant applies only to inadmissible hearsay. | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See Davis, 562 So.2d at 433 . [3] Like the Abd-Rahmaan court, we too have found only the one federal district court case of Ash v. Reilly, 354 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004), holding that Crawford is applicable in revocation proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
Olive v. Maasgreen1 sentence2005See id. at 648 . | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen1 sentence2002See Kearse v. State, 770 So.2d 1119, 1126-27 (Fla.2000) (rejecting the contention that rule 3.202 violates a defendant's due process rights by creating a one-way discovery obligation); see also Buchanan v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402, 423-24 , 107 S.Ct. 2906 , 97 L.Ed.2d 336 (1987) (holding that subjecting the defendant to the State's mental health examination for the purpose of rebutting the defendant's alleged emotional disturbance did not violate the Fifth Amendment); Davis v. State, 698 So.2d 1182, 1191 (Fla.1997) (rejecting the contention that requiring a defendant to submit to an examination | 1 | 1 |
Dillbeck v. Stategreen1 sentence2002See Kearse v. State, 770 So.2d 1119, 1126-27 (Fla.2000) (rejecting the contention that rule 3.202 violates a defendant's due process rights by creating a one-way discovery obligation); see also Buchanan v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402, 423-24 , 107 S.Ct. 2906 , 97 L.Ed.2d 336 (1987) (holding that subjecting the defendant to the State's mental health examination for the purpose of rebutting the defendant's alleged emotional disturbance did not violate the Fifth Amendment); Davis v. State, 698 So.2d 1182, 1191 (Fla.1997) (rejecting the contention that requiring a defendant to submit to an examination | 1 | 1 |
Kearse v. Stategreen1 sentence2002See Kearse v. State, 770 So.2d 1119, 1126-27 (Fla.2000) (rejecting the contention that rule 3.202 violates a defendant's due process rights by creating a one-way discovery obligation); see also Buchanan v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402, 423-24 , 107 S.Ct. 2906 , 97 L.Ed.2d 336 (1987) (holding that subjecting the defendant to the State's mental health examination for the purpose of rebutting the defendant's alleged emotional disturbance did not violate the Fifth Amendment); Davis v. State, 698 So.2d 1182, 1191 (Fla.1997) (rejecting the contention that requiring a defendant to submit to an examination | 1 | 1 |
Buchanan v. Kentuckygreen2 sentences2002See Kearse v. State, 770 So.2d 1119, 1126-27 (Fla.2000) (rejecting the contention that rule 3.202 violates a defendant's due process rights by creating a one-way discovery obligation); see also Buchanan v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402, 423-24 , 107 S.Ct. 2906 , 97 L.Ed.2d 336 (1987) (holding that subjecting the defendant to the State's mental health examination for the purpose of rebutting the defendant's alleged emotional disturbance did not violate the Fifth Amendment); Davis v. State, 698 So.2d 1182, 1191 (Fla.1997) (rejecting the contention that requiring a defendant to submit to an examination 2002See Kearse v. State, 770 So.2d 1119, 1126-27 (Fla.2000) (rejecting the contention that rule 3.202 violates a defendant's due process rights by creating a one-way discovery obligation); see also Buchanan v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402, 423-24 , 107 S.Ct. 2906 , 97 L.Ed.2d 336 (1987) (holding that subjecting the defendant to the State's mental health examination for the purpose of rebutting the defendant's alleged emotional disturbance did not violate the Fifth Amendment); Davis v. State, 698 So.2d 1182, 1191 (Fla.1997) (rejecting the contention that requiring a defendant to submit to an examination | 1 | 1 |
| Vargas v. Glades General Hosp.green | 1 | 1 |
| State v. DiGuiliogreen | 1 | 1 |
| The Florida Bar v. Vernellgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Estate of Hopkinsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| City of Tallahassee v. Manngreen | 1 | 1 |
| GULF OFFSHORE CO., ETC. v. Mobil Oil Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| CPC International, Inc. v. Goldberggreen | 1 | 1 |
| LaBar Enterprises, Inc. v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| Yukon Equipment, Inc. v. Gordongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hedges v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Shriner v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. State
green
2 sentences1991Adams v. State, 412 So.2d 850 (Fla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 882 [ 103 S.Ct. 182 , 74 L.Ed.2d 148 ] (1982). 1990Adams v. State, 412 So.2d 850 (Fla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 882 , 103 S.Ct. 182 , 74 L.Ed.2d 148 (1982). | 2 | 1990–1991 |
Tison v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1991Adams v. State, 412 So.2d 850 (Fla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 882 [ 103 S.Ct. 182 , 74 L.Ed.2d 148 ] (1982). 1991Adams v. State, 412 So.2d 850 (Fla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 882 [ 103 S.Ct. 182 , 74 L.Ed.2d 148 ] (1982). | 2 | 1990–1991 |
Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.
green
1 sentence2017The plaintiff responded to the summary judgment motion with the contention that the claim was not time barred because (1) Cavalier’s unasserted personal injury claim had not expired at the time of his death in July 1993, giving his survivors 2 years to bring a wrongful death claim; (2) the original Engle lawsuit was filed within the 2-year period that Cavalier’s survivors could have brought a wrongful death claim, thereby tolling the wrongful death statute of limitations; (3) as a survivor with .a wrongful death claim, plaintiff was a member of the Engle class, which included “[a]ll [Florida] | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Michigan v. Thomas
green
2 sentences2016Id. at 1006 (“[T]he justification to conduct such a warrantless search does not vanish once the car has been immobilized.” (quoting Michigan v. Thomas, 458 U.S. 259, 261 , 102 S.Ct. 3079 , 73 L.Ed.2d 750 (1982))). 2016Id. at 1006 (“[T]he justification to conduct such a warrantless search does not vanish once the car has been immobilized.” (quoting Michigan v. Thomas, 458 U.S. 259, 261 , 102 S.Ct. 3079 , 73 L.Ed.2d 750 (1982))). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Montgomery v. State
green
1 sentence2014As for Ground 11, in which Appellant claimed that, pursuant to Montgomery v. State, 70 So.3d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), the trial court committed fundamental error during his trial by giving an erroneous manslaughter by act jury instruction, we agree with the State’s contention that the claim was untimely and that none of the exceptions to the two-year time limitation in rule 3.850 are applicable to this claim. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Hubbard v. State
green
1 sentence2013See Pearson v. State, 867 So.2d 517, 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Weitz v. State, 795 So.2d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Hubbard v. State, 662 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Roviaro v. United States
green
2 sentences2012Both Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 59 , 77 S.Ct. 623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(g)(2), involve the issue of the “Government’s privilege to withhold from disclosure” to criminal defendants “the identity of persons who furnish information of violations of law to officers.” Neither Ro-viaro nor rule 3.220(g)(2) involves a disclosure from one law enforcement agency to another pursuant to an investigative subpoena. 2012Both Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 59 , 77 S.Ct. 623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(g)(2), involve the issue of the “Government’s privilege to withhold from disclosure” to criminal defendants “the identity of persons who furnish information of violations of law to officers.” Neither Ro-viaro nor rule 3.220(g)(2) involves a disclosure from one law enforcement agency to another pursuant to an investigative subpoena. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Ventura v. State
green
1 sentence2010Ventura v. State, 29 So.3d 1086 (Fla.2010). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Sternberg v. Sternberg
green
2 sentences2008While this was indeed the law expressed in Sternberg v. Sternberg, 139 Fla. 219 , 190 So. 486 (1939), that rule did not survive the enactment of the "new" rules of civil procedure more than fifty years ago. 2008While this was indeed the law expressed in Sternberg v. Sternberg, 139 Fla. 219 , 190 So. 486 (1939), that rule did not survive the enactment of the "new" rules of civil procedure more than fifty years ago. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Delgado v. State
green
1 sentence2006In Delgado v. State, 573 So.2d 83 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990), the Second District concluded the trial judge in a murder case had erred in admitting testimony from the defendant's girlfriend that the defendant used drugs and boasted that he had killed ten men. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Thomas v. State
green
1 sentence2005Thomas v. State, 838 So.2d 535 (Fla.2003), concerned a defendant who, when pleading guilty to murdering his mother, agreed to waive his right to appeal the guilt phase issues in a separate case involving the murder of his wife. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Whitton v. State green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Snow v. Nelson green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Lafferty v. Tennant green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Fulton v. State green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Saborit v. Deliford green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| DIAZ BY RIVAS v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Griffin v. General Motors Corp. green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Irwin v. Pacific Southwest Airlines green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Polk County v. Florida Public Service Com'n green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| White Const. Co., Inc. v. Dupont green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Darty v. State green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Williams v. State green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Wilcox v. State green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Witherspoon v. Illinois green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Darty v. State green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| White v. Illinois green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Vivona v. Conboy green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Drake v. State green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Petition of Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida, Inc. green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Chandler v. Florida green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Bagley v. State green | 1 | 1971–1971 |
| Carlton v. State green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Baugus v. State green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Paris v. Barfield neutral | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Beverly Beach Properties v. Nelson green | 1 | 1965–1965 |
| Hendrick v. Strazzulla green | 1 | 1965–1965 |
| Grubbs v. McShane neutral | 1 | 1965–1965 |
| Foster v. Thornton green | 1 | 1965–1965 |
| Hine v. Fox green | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.