Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1906–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grimm v. O'CONNOR
green
1 sentence1998Id. at 43 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Waldron
green
2 sentences1971State v. Fields, 279 Minn. 374 , 157 N. W. (2d) 61 ; State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , 139 N. W. (2d) 785 . 1971State v. Fields, 279 Minn. 374 , 157 N. W. (2d) 61 ; State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , 139 N. W. (2d) 785 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
State v. Fields
green
2 sentences1971State v. Fields, 279 Minn. 374 , 157 N. W. (2d) 61 ; State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , 139 N. W. (2d) 785 . 1971State v. Fields, 279 Minn. 374 , 157 N. W. (2d) 61 ; State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , 139 N. W. (2d) 785 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Visina v. Freeman
green
1 sentence1958Basic to a consideration of this contention is the principle that this court will not interfere with the legislature’s classification unless it is so manifestly arbitrary as to evince a purpose of evading the constitution. 20 In Visina v. Freeman, 252 *182 Minn. 177, 196, 89 N. W. (2d) 635, 651 , we summarized the features which distinguish a general law from a special law by saying: “(1) A law is general when it is uniform in its operation even though it divides the subjects of its operation into classes and applies different rules to different classes. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Knight v. Martin
green
2 sentences1928As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N. W. 941 ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , 163 N. W. 975 ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , 170 N. W. 696 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N. W. 424 . 1928As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N. W. 941 ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , 163 N. W. 975 ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , 170 N. W. 696 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N. W. 424 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Wagner v. Seaberg
neutral
2 sentences1928As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N. W. 941 ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , 163 N. W. 975 ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , 170 N. W. 696 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N. W. 424 . 1928As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N. W. 941 ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , 163 N. W. 975 ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , 170 N. W. 696 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N. W. 424 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Greenfield v. Peterson
neutral
2 sentences1928As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N. W. 941 ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , 163 N. W. 975 ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , 170 N. W. 696 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N. W. 424 . 1928As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N. W. 941 ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , 163 N. W. 975 ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , 170 N. W. 696 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N. W. 424 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Klessig v. Lea
green
2 sentences1928As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N. W. 941 ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , 163 N. W. 975 ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , 170 N. W. 696 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N. W. 424 . 1928As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N. W. 941 ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , 163 N. W. 975 ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , 170 N. W. 696 ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , 189 N. W. 424 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
King v. Burnham
neutral
2 sentences1906No exception was noted at the trial, but the notice of motion for a new trial specified as a ground thereof, among others: “(2) That the court erred in granting the motion of the defendant, made at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, to dismiss the action.” We held in King v. Burnham, 93 Minn. 288 , 101 N. W. 302 , that a distinct and specific designation in a motion for a new trial of the ruling complained of and made the basis of the motion is a sufficient exception, under chapter 113, p. 121, Laws 1901, dispensing with the necessity of taking exceptions at the trial. 1906No exception was noted at the trial, but the notice of motion for a new trial specified as a ground thereof, among others: “(2) That the court erred in granting the motion of the defendant, made at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, to dismiss the action.” We held in King v. Burnham, 93 Minn. 288 , 101 N. W. 302 , that a distinct and specific designation in a motion for a new trial of the ruling complained of and made the basis of the motion is a sufficient exception, under chapter 113, p. 121, Laws 1901, dispensing with the necessity of taking exceptions at the trial. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.