contention rule in Hawaii

1901“In Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert, 142 U. S. 339 , a special tax was laid upon express companies which did not own their own means of transportation and not upon other express companies, and the contention was that the rule of uniformity and equality was destroyed by arbitrary discrimination, but the court held that there was an essential difference between companies that owned their own means of transportation and those that did not, inasmuch as the former possessed property which was subject to other taxes and the latter .would escape taxation unless taxed specially, and hence the classific

1897In Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert, 142 U. S. 339 , a special tax was laid upon express companies which did not own their own means of transportation and not upon other express companies, and the contention was that the rule of uniformity and equality was destroyed by arbitrary discrimination, but the court held that there was an essential difference between companies that owned their own means of transportation and those that did not, inasmuch as the former possessed property which was subject to other taxes and the latter would escape taxation unless taxed specially, and hence the classificat

2018In Basque , we addressed the State's contention that the rule in Lui , later codified as HRE Rule 404(a)(2), "allows only the use of character evidence-to be proved by reputation or opinion-and not evidence of 'other crimes, wrongs, or acts,' which is covered by Rule 404(b)." 66 Haw. at 513 -14 , 666 P.2d at 602 .

2018In Basque , we addressed the State's contention that the rule in Lui , later codified as HRE Rule 404(a)(2), "allows only the use of character evidence-to be proved by reputation or opinion-and not evidence of 'other crimes, wrongs, or acts,' which is covered by Rule 404(b)." 66 Haw. at 513 -14 , 666 P.2d at 602 .

2014The court rejected the employer’s contention that the claim should be denied because the claimant “failed to show that she was exposed to an increased risk attributable to work.” Id. at 560 , 584 P.2d at 125 .

2014The court rejected the employer’s contention that the claim should be denied because the claimant “failed to show that she was exposed to an increased risk attributable to work.” Id. at 560 , 584 P.2d at 125 .

1996Fourth, the dissent's contention that the immunity provisions of HRS chapter 386 may be "easily circumvented by simply claiming that a supervising employee allowed an employee to work in an unsafe environment," dissenting opinion at 19, 919 P.2d at 281 , is specious, and the dissent's fear that "almost any claim for an on-the-job injury may be framed as a claim under HRS § 386-8 against a supervising employee for `wantonly' allowing the employee to work in an unsafe environment," id., is based on an incomplete statement of the standard adopted by this opinion for "wilful and wanton misconduct.

1991In reaching its holding in Grady , the Supreme Court “rejected the contention that the test of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S. Ct. 180 , 76 L.

1991In reaching its holding in Grady , the Supreme Court “rejected the contention that the test of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S. Ct. 180 , 76 L.

1991Ed. 306 (1932) — which provides that cumulative penalties, and thus successive prosecutions, should not be barred if each offense charged requires proof of an element which the other does not — constituted the full extent of double jeopardy protection.” United States v. Gambino, 742 F. Supp. 855, 857 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 923 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1990) (citation omitted).

1966The State cites Slidell v. Grandjean, 111 U.S. 412 , 4 S.Ct. 475 , 28 L.Ed. 321 , and Coosaw Mining Co. v. State of South Carolina, 144 U.S. 550 , 12 S.Ct. 689 , 36 L.Ed. 537 , for the rule that where a statute operates as a grant of public property to an individual, the statute should be strictly construed in favor of the sovereign interest.

1966The State cites Slidell v. Grandjean, 111 U.S. 412 , 4 S.Ct. 475 , 28 L.Ed. 321 , and Coosaw Mining Co. v. State of South Carolina, 144 U.S. 550 , 12 S.Ct. 689 , 36 L.Ed. 537 , for the rule that where a statute operates as a grant of public property to an individual, the statute should be strictly construed in favor of the sovereign interest.

1966The State cites Slidell v. Grandjean, 111 U.S. 412 , 4 S.Ct. 475 , 28 L.Ed. 321 , and Coosaw Mining Co. v. State of South Carolina, 144 U.S. 550 , 12 S.Ct. 689 , 36 L.Ed. 537 , for the rule that where a statute operates as a grant of public property to an individual, the statute should be strictly construed in favor of the sovereign interest.

1966The State cites Slidell v. Grandjean, 111 U.S. 412 , 4 S.Ct. 475 , 28 L.Ed. 321 , and Coosaw Mining Co. v. State of South Carolina, 144 U.S. 550 , 12 S.Ct. 689 , 36 L.Ed. 537 , for the rule that where a statute operates as a grant of public property to an individual, the statute should be strictly construed in favor of the sovereign interest.

1966The State cites Slidell v. Grandjean, 111 U.S. 412 , 4 S.Ct. 475 , 28 L.Ed. 321 , and Coosaw Mining Co. v. State of South Carolina, 144 U.S. 550 , 12 S.Ct. 689 , 36 L.Ed. 537 , for the rule that where a statute operates as a grant of public property to an individual, the statute should be strictly construed in favor of the sovereign interest.

1945(Okuu v. Kaiaikawaha, 7 Haw. 311 ; Luka v. Poohina, 3 Haw. 728 .) *59 Hence, the contention that a waiver arises from an omission in a motion after verdict is untenable in so far as it concerns alleged errors of trial in the appellant’s bill of exceptions.

1945(Okuu v. Kaiaikawaha, 7 Haw. 311 ; Luka v. Poohina, 3 Haw. 728 .) *59 Hence, the contention that a waiver arises from an omission in a motion after verdict is untenable in so far as it concerns alleged errors of trial in the appellant’s bill of exceptions.