Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
22 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Richards v. Midland Brick Sales Co.green1 sentence2020Under the economic loss doctrine, “plaintiffs cannot recover in tort when they have suffered only economic harm.” Richards v. Midland Brick Sales Co., 551 N.W.2d 649, 650 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Pace v. CSX Transportation, Inc.green2 sentences2018To illustrate, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which originated the test, found that a nuisance claim brought by property owners based on a railroad’s construction and use of a new side track was preempted, notwithstanding the plaintiffs’ contention that their claim was “not directly related to the operation and use of the side track.” Pace v. CSX Transp., Inc., 613 F.3d 1066, 1069 (11th Cir. 2010). 19 And the court distinguished its own precedent that preempted “a state law tort suit against a railroad company for allowing trains to block railroad crossings.” Id. 2018To illustrate, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which originated the test, found that a nuisance claim brought by property owners based on a railroad's construction and use of a new side track was preempted, notwithstanding the plaintiffs' contention that their claim was "not directly related to the operation and use of the side track." Pace v. CSX Transp., Inc ., 613 F.3d 1066 , 1069 (11th Cir. 2010). | 1 | 1 |
MD Mall Assocs., LLC v. CSX Transp., Inc.green1 sentence2018See also MD Mall Assocs., LLC, v. CSX Transp., Inc ., 288 F.Supp.3d 565 , 596-99 (E.D. | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. John David Greengreen1 sentence2018See Green, 896 N.W.2d at 780-81 (observing the court has “permitted the practice of instructing juries on inferences of malice from certain 6 evidence since 1858”). | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Craig Anthony Finneygreen1 sentence2017See id. at 54-55 (stating the United States Supreme Court’s “caselaw recognizes two distinct strands of constitutional analysis related to guilty pleas”: claims “rooted in the right to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment,” and claims “based on the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments requir[ing] the trial court to determine the defendant made a knowing and intelligent choice” to plead guilty to the underlying crime). | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of L.M.W.green1 sentence2014Reasonable services must be provided to attempt to reunite a family before the State can terminate parental rights.5 See In re L.M.W., 518 N.W.2d 804, 807 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994). | 1 | 1 |
Christie v. Rolscreen Co.green1 sentence1990See Christie v. Rolscreen Co., 448 N.W.2d 447, 450-51 (Iowa 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Synnott v. Stategreen1 sentence1981See Synnott v. State, 515 P.2d 1154 (Okla.Ct.Crim.App.1973) (no privilege against incrimination violation); Commonwealth v. Rutan, 229 Pa.Super. 400 , 323 A.2d 730 (1974) (no fourth or fifth amendment violation). | 1 | 1 |
City of Sioux City v. Fairbanksgreen1 sentence1980The latter assessment was recently again reaffirmed in In re Discharge of Fairbanks, 287 N.W.2d 579, 582 (Iowa 1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Friberg v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
green
1 sentence2018City S. Ry., 267 F.3d 439 (5th Cir. 2001)). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
City of Lake Charles v. Dave's Swedish Spa Resort
green
1 sentence2002In a Louisiana sales tax case, City of Lake Charles v. Dave’s Swedish Spa Resort, 441 So.2d 50 (La.Ct.App.1983), the court rejected a similar contention, stating: Facilities which increase one’s athletic abilities are athletic facilities, whether or not one chooses to use his increased athletic abilities competitively. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Young
green
1 sentence1984Id. (emphasis in original). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Commonwealth v. Rutan
green
2 sentences1981See Synnott v. State, 515 P.2d 1154 (Okla.Ct.Crim.App.1973) (no privilege against incrimination violation); Commonwealth v. Rutan, 229 Pa.Super. 400 , 323 A.2d 730 (1974) (no fourth or fifth amendment violation). 1981See Synnott v. State, 515 P.2d 1154 (Okla.Ct.Crim.App.1973) (no privilege against incrimination violation); Commonwealth v. Rutan, 229 Pa.Super. 400 , 323 A.2d 730 (1974) (no fourth or fifth amendment violation). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
State v. Conner
green
2 sentences1980Specifically, we found no merit in the contention that this rule denies constitutional rights to compulsory process and due process, id. at 457-58 , or in the assertion that polygraph evidence has attained sufficient scientific acceptance and eviden-tiary reliability to be admissible absent stipulation, id. at 458-59 . 1980Specifically, we found no merit in the contention that this rule denies constitutional rights to compulsory process and due process, id. at 457-58 , or in the assertion that polygraph evidence has attained sufficient scientific acceptance and eviden-tiary reliability to be admissible absent stipulation, id. at 458-59 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Cowman v. Hansen
green
2 sentences1977In Cowman v. Hansen, 250 Iowa 358 , 92 N.W.2d 682 , as in the case at bar, plaintiffs were asserting a claim under principles of common law negligence after having been thwarted in their attempt to recover under the provisions of the Dram Shop Act. 1977In Cowman v. Hansen, 250 Iowa 358 , 92 N.W.2d 682 , as in the case at bar, plaintiffs were asserting a claim under principles of common law negligence after having been thwarted in their attempt to recover under the provisions of the Dram Shop Act. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Smith
green
1 sentence1970A similar contention of violation of constitutional rights is rejected in State v. Smith, 182 N.W.2d 409 (Iowa, filed De *415 cember IS, 1970). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Eves v. Littig Construction Co.
green
2 sentences1964He predicates this contention on the doctrine of “liability without fault”, which we have applied in such cases as Monroe v. Razor Construction Co., 252 Iowa 1249 , 110 N.W.2d 250 , and Eves v. Littig Construction Co., 202 Iowa 1338 , 212 N.W. 154 . 1964He predicates this contention on the doctrine of “liability without fault”, which we have applied in such cases as Monroe v. Razor Construction Co., 252 Iowa 1249 , 110 N.W.2d 250 , and Eves v. Littig Construction Co., 202 Iowa 1338 , 212 N.W. 154 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Monroe v. RAZOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
green
2 sentences1964He predicates this contention on the doctrine of “liability without fault”, which we have applied in such cases as Monroe v. Razor Construction Co., 252 Iowa 1249 , 110 N.W.2d 250 , and Eves v. Littig Construction Co., 202 Iowa 1338 , 212 N.W. 154 . 1964He predicates this contention on the doctrine of “liability without fault”, which we have applied in such cases as Monroe v. Razor Construction Co., 252 Iowa 1249 , 110 N.W.2d 250 , and Eves v. Littig Construction Co., 202 Iowa 1338 , 212 N.W. 154 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Engle v. Nelson
green
2 sentences1960As is well known, conduct of this operation requires protection just as much as does the truck, and the lights are intended to protect not only the disabled truck but to make other automobile drivers aware of the entire situation and of the dangers incident to it, mcludmg operations wndertalcen to remove the disabled trucks from the highway(Emphasis added.) Engle v. Nelson, 220 Iowa 771 , 263 N.W. 505 , is the principal authority cited for the contention instruction 10-A was reversible error. 1960As is well known, conduct of this operation requires protection just as much as does the truck, and the lights are intended to protect not only the disabled truck but to make other automobile drivers aware of the entire situation and of the dangers incident to it, mcludmg operations wndertalcen to remove the disabled trucks from the highway(Emphasis added.) Engle v. Nelson, 220 Iowa 771 , 263 N.W. 505 , is the principal authority cited for the contention instruction 10-A was reversible error. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Law v. Bryant Asphaltic Paving Co.
green
1 sentence1956The principal case relied upon was Law v. Bryant Asphaltic Paving Co., 175 Iowa 747 , 157 N.W. 175 , 7 A. L. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
State v. Friar
green
1 sentence1951State v. Friar, 204 Iowa 414 , 214 N.W. 596 , also relied upon, fails "to support defendant’s position. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
State v. Trybom
neutral
1 sentence1951In State v. Trybom, 195 Iowa 780 , 192 N.W. 813 , also cited by defendant, where the death occurred from a gunshot wound, it was the contention of the defense that the gun was discharged by accident. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Fickbohm Ex Rel. Kosier v. Ryal Miller Chevrolet Co.
neutral
2 sentences1941Fickbohm v. Ryal Miller Chevrolet Company, 228 Iowa 919, 925 , 292 N. W. 801, 803 , held that a contention of error in “an *227 acknowledgment and determination of the existence of the relationship of employer and employee” would not be considered, the agreement not being set aside or attacked on the ground of mutual mistake or fraud. 1941Fickbohm v. Ryal Miller Chevrolet Company, 228 Iowa 919, 925 , 292 N. W. 801, 803 , held that a contention of error in “an *227 acknowledgment and determination of the existence of the relationship of employer and employee” would not be considered, the agreement not being set aside or attacked on the ground of mutual mistake or fraud. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Andrew v. Dundee Savings Bank
neutral
2 sentences1939Bank, 216 Iowa 240 , 249 N. W. 154 . 1939Bank, 216 Iowa 240 , 249 N. W. 154 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Hamilton v. Barton
neutral
1 sentence1907Hence the addition made to the verdict was the correction of a, formal error.” See, also, Hamilton v. Barton, 20 Iowa, 505 ; Roberts v. Roberts, 91 Iowa, 228 . | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Babcock v. Chicago & Northwestern R'y Co.
green
1 sentence1907And tbe correct rule is deduced to be that proof of a fire set out by a locomotive engine “ makes a prima facie case of negligence, and tbe burden is devolved upon tbe company to show itself free from negligence.” Further in tbe course of tbe opinion, it is said, in respect of tbe provision now' appearing in section 2055, that “ the design is to provide what is necessary to show a prima facie liability for fires.” In Babcock v. Railway, 62 Iowa, 593 , the contention for error was based on the refusal of the trial court to instruct a verdict in favor of defendant. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Roberts v. Roberts
green
1 sentence1907Hence the addition made to the verdict was the correction of a, formal error.” See, also, Hamilton v. Barton, 20 Iowa, 505 ; Roberts v. Roberts, 91 Iowa, 228 . | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Hopper v. Moore & Co.
neutral
1 sentence1905Humbert v. Larson, 89 Iowa, 258 ; Crosby v. Hungerford, 59 Iowa, 712 ; Hopper v. Moore, 42 Iowa, 563 . 1- bridgesllabiHty for Instruction. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Crosby v. Hungerford
green
1 sentence1905Humbert v. Larson, 89 Iowa, 258 ; Crosby v. Hungerford, 59 Iowa, 712 ; Hopper v. Moore, 42 Iowa, 563 . 1- bridgesllabiHty for Instruction. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
| Jaffray & Co. v. Thompson neutral | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Humbert v. Larson
green
1 sentence1905Humbert v. Larson, 89 Iowa, 258 ; Crosby v. Hungerford, 59 Iowa, 712 ; Hopper v. Moore, 42 Iowa, 563 . 1- bridgesllabiHty for Instruction. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.