knowledge inquiry in Oklahoma

1935“A purchaser of lands who buys in reliance upon the record title is chargeable with all the notice brought to him by the records; and if the record contains matters that would put a person of ordinary prudence upon inquiry into the nature of the title of the grantor, or of the rights and equities of a former owner, then the law charges such purchaser with all the knowledge an inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with reasonable diligence, would have brought home to him,” Daniel v. Tolon et al., 53 Okla. 666 , 157 P. 756 .

1935“A purchaser of lands who buys in reliance upon the record title is chargeable with all the notice brought to him by the records; and if the record contains matters that would put a person of ordinary prudence upon inquiry into the nature of the title of the grantor, or of the rights and equities of a former owner, then the law charges such purchaser with all the knowledge an inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with reasonable diligence, would have brought home to him,” Daniel v. Tolon et al., 53 Okla. 666 , 157 P. 756 .

1992In the absence of demonstrated prejudice, see Newsted v. State, 720 P.2d 734 (Okl.Cr.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986), this assignment is denied.

1992In the absence of demonstrated prejudice, see Newsted v. State, 720 P.2d 734 (Okl.Cr.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986), this assignment is denied.

1992In the absence of demonstrated prejudice, see Newsted v. State, 720 P.2d 734 (Okl.Cr.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986), this assignment is denied.

1992In the absence of demonstrated prejudice, see Newsted v. State, 720 P.2d 734 (Okl.Cr.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 995 , 107 S.Ct. 599 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1986), this assignment is denied.

1951City of Duncan v. Woods, 194 Okla. 371 , 151 P. 2d 923 ; Sanders v. First Nat.

1951City of Duncan v. Woods, 194 Okla. 371 , 151 P. 2d 923 ; Sanders v. First Nat.

1931In Lair v. Myers, 71 Okla. 175 , 176 Pac. 225 , first aud second paragraphs of syllabus, this court said: •‘A purchaser of lands, who has knowledge that another person claims some interest in the lands, is charged with ail the knowledge an inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with .reasonable diligence, -would have disclosed.

1931In Lair v. Myers, 71 Okla. 175 , 176 Pac. 225 , first aud second paragraphs of syllabus, this court said: •‘A purchaser of lands, who has knowledge that another person claims some interest in the lands, is charged with ail the knowledge an inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with .reasonable diligence, -would have disclosed.

1931“Every person -who has actual notice of circumstances sufficient to put a prudent man upon inquiry as to a particular fact, and who omits to make such inquiry with reasonable diligence, is deemed to have constructive notice of the fact itself.” And in the case of Tittle v. Robberson, 143 Okla. 97 , 287 Pac. 1011 , this court said: “It has been decided, in a long line of eases, that one who proceeds with knowledge of such facts as will put a prudent man upon inquiry, which, if prosecuted with ordinary diligence, would lead to actual notice of rights claimed adversely to his vendor, is guilty of

1931“Every person -who has actual notice of circumstances sufficient to put a prudent man upon inquiry as to a particular fact, and who omits to make such inquiry with reasonable diligence, is deemed to have constructive notice of the fact itself.” And in the case of Tittle v. Robberson, 143 Okla. 97 , 287 Pac. 1011 , this court said: “It has been decided, in a long line of eases, that one who proceeds with knowledge of such facts as will put a prudent man upon inquiry, which, if prosecuted with ordinary diligence, would lead to actual notice of rights claimed adversely to his vendor, is guilty of

1929Bynum v. Moore, 101 Okla. 128 , 223 Pac. 687 ; Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 666 , 157 Pac. 756 ; Allison v. Crummey, 64 Okla. 20 , 166 Pac. 691 .

1929Bynum v. Moore, 101 Okla. 128 , 223 Pac. 687 ; Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 666 , 157 Pac. 756 ; Allison v. Crummey, 64 Okla. 20 , 166 Pac. 691 .

1929Bynum v. Moore, 101 Okla. 128 , 223 Pac. 687 ; Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 666 , 157 Pac. 756 ; Allison v. Crummey, 64 Okla. 20 , 166 Pac. 691 .

1929Bynum v. Moore, 101 Okla. 128 , 223 Pac. 687 ; Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 666 , 157 Pac. 756 ; Allison v. Crummey, 64 Okla. 20 , 166 Pac. 691 .

1928Fifth, the party to whom it was made must have relied on or acted upon it to his prejudice.” And in Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 667 , 157 Pac. 756 , to wit: “A purchaser of lands, who buys in reliance upon the record title, is chargeable with all the notice brought to him by the records; and if the record contains matters that would put a person of ordinary prudence upon inquiry into .the nature of the title of the grantor, or of the rights and equities of a former owner, then the law charges such purchaser with all the knowledge an inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with reasonable diligence, wo

1928Fifth, the party to whom it was made must have relied on or acted upon it to his prejudice.” And in Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 667 , 157 Pac. 756 , to wit: “A purchaser of lands, who buys in reliance upon the record title, is chargeable with all the notice brought to him by the records; and if the record contains matters that would put a person of ordinary prudence upon inquiry into .the nature of the title of the grantor, or of the rights and equities of a former owner, then the law charges such purchaser with all the knowledge an inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with reasonable diligence, wo

1928When a person has sufficient information to lead him to a fact, he shall be deemed conversant with it.” Plaintiff’s argument in support of his contentions under these principles proceeds op the theory of the rule as laid down in Jackson v. Twin State Oil Co., 95 Okla. 96 , 218 Pac. 324 , to wit: “The doctrine of estoppel by conduct is an equitable doctrine, and is not available to a party guilty of inequitable conduct in reference to the transaction in which he invokes its application.” Under his theory of the case, plaintiff’s argument summarized resolves itself into the legal proposition tha

1928When a person has sufficient information to lead him to a fact, he shall be deemed conversant with it.” Plaintiff’s argument in support of his contentions under these principles proceeds op the theory of the rule as laid down in Jackson v. Twin State Oil Co., 95 Okla. 96 , 218 Pac. 324 , to wit: “The doctrine of estoppel by conduct is an equitable doctrine, and is not available to a party guilty of inequitable conduct in reference to the transaction in which he invokes its application.” Under his theory of the case, plaintiff’s argument summarized resolves itself into the legal proposition tha

1923Tlie plaintiff in error contends that under the rule announced in the case of Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 677 , 157 Pac. 756 , to wit: “A purchaser of lands, who buys in reliance upon the record title, is chargeable with all the notice brought to him by the records; and if the record contains matters that would put a person of ordinary prudence upon inquiry into the nature of the title of the grantor, or of the rights and equities of a former owner, then the law charges such purchaser with all the knowledge an inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with reasonable diligence, would have brought home t

1923Tlie plaintiff in error contends that under the rule announced in the case of Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 677 , 157 Pac. 756 , to wit: “A purchaser of lands, who buys in reliance upon the record title, is chargeable with all the notice brought to him by the records; and if the record contains matters that would put a person of ordinary prudence upon inquiry into the nature of the title of the grantor, or of the rights and equities of a former owner, then the law charges such purchaser with all the knowledge an inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with reasonable diligence, would have brought home t

1916If this record is such and contains matter'that would put an ordinarily prudent purchaser in doubt of, and upon inquiry into, the want of capacity of his grantor, then the law will charge h’m with all the knowledge that inquiry upon his part, prosecuted with reasonable diligence, would have brought home to him.” Quoting from the opinion of the Supreme Court in Wood v. Carpenter, 101 U. S. 141 , 25 L.