protection privilege in Arkansas

9 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 1882–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Pittmangreen ark · 2005 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967).	1	1
Gilbert v. Californiagreen scotus · 1967 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967).	1	1
Schmerber v. Californiagreen scotus · 1966 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967).	1	1
Burmingham v. Stategreen ark · 2000 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
Arkansas Associated Telephone Co. v. Blankenship green ark · 1947 2 sentences 1982In Arkansas Associated Telephone Company v. Blankenship, 211 Ark. 645 , 201 S.W.2d 1019 (1947), we approved the following language: “The protection of the privilege may be lost by the manner of its exercise, although the belief in the truth of the charge exists. 1982In Arkansas Associated Telephone Company v. Blankenship, 211 Ark. 645 , 201 S.W.2d 1019 (1947), we approved the following language: “The protection of the privilege may be lost by the manner of its exercise, although the belief in the truth of the charge exists.	2	1964–1982
BUTLER v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania green · 1851 2 sentences 1934Butler v. Pennsylvania, 10 How. 402 .” In Powell v. Burden, 61 Ark. 21 , 31 S. W. 740 , the above statement was approved, and the court further said: “The mere discretion of the Legislature is not in determining when a general or special law is applicable, but, in a case like the act under consideration, in determining the amount of pay of these officers and the manner of paying them; and this discretion may be abused so that the courts would interfere to prevent such abuses. 1882Butler v. Pennsylvania, 10 How., 402 .	2	1882–1934
Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling green scotus · 1946 2 sentences 2012Press Publ’g Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 208 , 66 S.Ct. 494 , 90 L.Ed. 614 (1946). 2012Press Publ’g Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 208 , 66 S.Ct. 494 , 90 L.Ed. 614 (1946).	1	2012–2012
Moore v. State green ark · 1996 2 sentences 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). 2010We have declined to extend the protection of the privilege to the collection of blood samples, see Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95, 111 , 27 S.W.3d 351, 361 (2000); Moore, 323 Ark. at 537-38 , 915 S.W.2d at 289 ; see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-64 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), or handwriting samples, Pittman, 360 Ark. at 278 , 200 S.W.3d at 897 ; see also Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 265-67 , 87 S.Ct. 1951, 1952-54 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967).	1	2010–2010
Watson v. Jones green scotus · 1872 2 sentences 2006The majority relies on the false assumption that CCS is an ecclesiastical institution that falls under the protection of the rule articulated in Watson v. Jones, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 679 (1871). 2006The majority relies on the false assumption that CCS is an ecclesiastical institution that falls under the protection of the rule articulated in Watson v. Jones, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 679 (1871).	1	2006–2006
Alford v. State green ark · 1954 2 sentences 2005We stated further that if such a test were applied, “the result would be to deprive the accused of much of the protection that the rule is intended to provide.” Alford, 223 Ark. at 335 . 2005We stated further that if such a test were applied, "the result would be to deprive the accused of much of the protection that the rule is intended to provide." Alford, 223 Ark. at 335 , 266 S.W.2d 804 .	1	2005–2005
Bohlinger v. Germania Life Insurance green ark · 1911 2 sentences 1935Co., 100 Ark. 477 , 140 S. W. 257 : ‘ ‘ The protection of the privilege may be lost by the manner of its exercise, although the belief in the truth of the charge exists. 1935Co., 100 Ark. 477 , 140 S. W. 257 : ‘ ‘ The protection of the privilege may be lost by the manner of its exercise, although the belief in the truth of the charge exists.	1	1935–1935
Powell v. Durden green ark · 1895 1 sentence 1934Butler v. Pennsylvania, 10 How. 402 .” In Powell v. Burden, 61 Ark. 21 , 31 S. W. 740 , the above statement was approved, and the court further said: “The mere discretion of the Legislature is not in determining when a general or special law is applicable, but, in a case like the act under consideration, in determining the amount of pay of these officers and the manner of paying them; and this discretion may be abused so that the courts would interfere to prevent such abuses.	1	1934–1934
Norman v. Fife green ark · 1895 1 sentence 1934Butler v. Pennsylvania, 10 How. 402 .” In Powell v. Burden, 61 Ark. 21 , 31 S. W. 740 , the above statement was approved, and the court further said: “The mere discretion of the Legislature is not in determining when a general or special law is applicable, but, in a case like the act under consideration, in determining the amount of pay of these officers and the manner of paying them; and this discretion may be abused so that the courts would interfere to prevent such abuses.	1	1934–1934

Where else courts name it

CA 107 (1881–2026) NY 99 (1840–2026) PA 60 (1853–2026) IL 52 (1873–2024) TX 48 (1885–2025) AL 44 (1866–2018) NJ 40 (1830–2026) IN 37 (1872–2024) CT 34 (1920–2023) MD 32 (1878–2014) NC 29 (1891–2025) VA 28 (1919–2024) WA 27 (1912–2026) FL 26 (1917–2020) WI 26 (1888–2018) MO 25 (1889–2024) MA 21 (1869–2025) MN 21 (1925–2025) DC 20 (1972–2025) OH 19 (1907–2024) OR 18 (1875–2020) LA 17 (1940–2008) KS 16 (1913–2005) AZ 15 (1965–2017) KY 15 (1916–2021) MI 15 (1963–2022) DE 14 (1952–2022) NM 14 (1964–2023) SD 13 (1972–2015) GA 13 (1884–2019) CO 13 (1927–2025) AK 12 (1972–2025) OK 12 (1912–2016) IA 12 (1922–2022) NE 11 (1899–2016) SC 11 (1884–2025) ND 11 (1897–2023) WV 10 (1875–2019) MS 9 (1970–2017) AR 9 (1882–2012) ME 9 (1984–2017) TN 8 (1953–2024) WY 8 (1923–2021) ID 7 (1971–2020) RI 6 (1962–2007) VT 5 (1920–1996) NH 5 (1981–2021) HI 5 (1947–2008) NV 4 (1923–2020) UT 4 (1922–2020) MT 4 (1977–1999) PR 3 (1953–1969)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check