protection privilege (Maine) · Go Syfert
← Maine issues

protection privilege in Maine

9 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratorygreen
scotus · 2008 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009See generally Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., -U.S. -,-, 128 S.Ct. 2395, 2400 , 171 L.Ed.2d 283 (2008); United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RR.

2009See generally Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., -U.S. -,-, 128 S.Ct. 2395, 2400 , 171 L.Ed.2d 283 (2008); United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RR.

11
In Re Erica B.green
me · 1987 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000See Monroe v. Town of Gray, 1999 ME 190, ¶ 4 , 743 A.2d 1257, 1258 ; see also In re Erica B., 520 A.2d 342, 344-45 (Me.1987).

11
Monroe v. Town of Graygreen
me · 1999 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000See Monroe v. Town of Gray, 1999 ME 190, ¶ 4 , 743 A.2d 1257, 1258 ; see also In re Erica B., 520 A.2d 342, 344-45 (Me.1987).

2000See Monroe v. Town of Gray, 1999 ME 190, ¶ 4 , 743 A.2d 1257, 1258 ; see also In re Erica B., 520 A.2d 342, 344-45 (Me.1987).

11
CRIBERG v. Raymondgreen
mass · 1976 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996To avail oneself of the privilege, however, the attorney seeking the protection of the privilege must have become involved in the repre *528 sentation in good faith. 1 Id. at 664 (citing Sriberg v. Raymond, 370 Mass. 105 , 345 N.E.2d 882, 884 (1976)) (privilege should attach to communication to prospective defendant relating to proceeding contemplated in good faith and under serious consideration).

1996To avail oneself of the privilege, however, the attorney seeking the protection of the privilege must have become involved in the repre *528 sentation in good faith. 1 Id. at 664 (citing Sriberg v. Raymond, 370 Mass. 105 , 345 N.E.2d 882, 884 (1976)) (privilege should attach to communication to prospective defendant relating to proceeding contemplated in good faith and under serious consideration).

11
Hill v. Town of Lubecgreen
me · 1992 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995Hill v. Town of Lubec, 609 A.2d 699, 700 (Me.1992).

11
State v. Bleylgreen
me · 1981 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
1 sentence

1984State v. Carter, 461 A.2d at 61-62; See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Bleyl, 435 A.2d 1349, 1357 (Me.1981).

11
DePietro v. Stategreen
mdctspecapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
1 sentence

1984State v. Carter, 461 A.2d at 61-62; See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Bleyl, 435 A.2d 1349, 1357 (Me.1981).

11
Miranda v. Arizonagreen
scotus · 1966 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
2 sentences

1984State v. Carter, 461 A.2d at 61-62; See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Bleyl, 435 A.2d 1349, 1357 (Me.1981).

1984State v. Carter, 461 A.2d at 61-62; See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Bleyl, 435 A.2d 1349, 1357 (Me.1981).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Dineen v. Daughan green
me · 1978
2 sentences

2017"To avail oneself of the privilege, however, the attorney seeking the protection of the privilege must have become involved in the representation in good faith." Id.

1996To avail oneself of the privilege, however, the attorney seeking the protection of the privilege must have become involved in the repre *528 sentation in good faith. 1 Id. at 664 (citing Sriberg v. Raymond, 370 Mass. 105 , 345 N.E.2d 882, 884 (1976)) (privilege should attach to communication to prospective defendant relating to proceeding contemplated in good faith and under serious consideration).

21996–2017
Hoffman v. United States green
scotus · 1951
2 sentences

2014“However, if the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usually required to be established in court, he would be compelled to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee.” Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 486 , 71 S.Ct. 814 .

2014“However, if the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usually required to be established in court, he would be compelled to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee.” Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 486 , 71 S.Ct. 814 .

12014–2014
In Re Christopher C. green
me · 1985
1 sentence

1999In fact, they did not raise, at the termination hearing, the issue of lack of separate counsel. [¶ 26] The parents point to In re Christopher C., 499 A.2d 163 (Me.1985), in which we held the failure of the court to appoint counsel for a mother for the preliminary protection hearing required vacation of the final child protection order.

11999–1999
Santos v. Rando Machine Corp. green
rid · 1993
1 sentence

1996Id.

11996–1996

Where else courts name it

CA 107 (1881–2026) NY 99 (1840–2026) PA 60 (1853–2026) IL 52 (1873–2024) TX 48 (1885–2025) AL 44 (1866–2018) NJ 40 (1830–2026) IN 37 (1872–2024) CT 34 (1920–2023) MD 32 (1878–2014) NC 29 (1891–2025) VA 28 (1919–2024) WA 27 (1912–2026) FL 26 (1917–2020) WI 26 (1888–2018) MO 25 (1889–2024) MA 21 (1869–2025) MN 21 (1925–2025) DC 20 (1972–2025) OH 19 (1907–2024) OR 18 (1875–2020) LA 17 (1940–2008) KS 16 (1913–2005) AZ 15 (1965–2017) KY 15 (1916–2021) MI 15 (1963–2022) DE 14 (1952–2022) NM 14 (1964–2023) SD 13 (1972–2015) GA 13 (1884–2019) CO 13 (1927–2025) AK 12 (1972–2025) OK 12 (1912–2016) IA 12 (1922–2022) NE 11 (1899–2016) SC 11 (1884–2025) ND 11 (1897–2023) WV 10 (1875–2019) MS 9 (1970–2017) AR 9 (1882–2012) ME 9 (1984–2017) TN 8 (1953–2024) WY 8 (1923–2021) ID 7 (1971–2020) RI 6 (1962–2007) VT 5 (1920–1996) NH 5 (1981–2021) HI 5 (1947–2008) NV 4 (1923–2020) UT 4 (1922–2020) MT 4 (1977–1999) PR 3 (1953–1969)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check