Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
26 Wisconsin opinions name it 3 courts 1888–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelbygreen2 sentences2003See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 (1989) (statute does not grant immunity from breach of contract claims). 2003See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 (1989) (statute does not grant immunity from breach of contract claims). | 2 | 2 |
Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Wallinggreen2 sentences1978Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 208 (1946). [35] This court has held that the relevancy of the requested documents need not be alleged in a subpoena duces tecum but is a matter to be considered in the issuance of and the compelling of compliance with the writ. 1978Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 208 (1946). | 2 | 2 |
Ferraro v. Koelschgreen2 sentences2003All of the cases are distinguishable, however, They all involve post-secondary schools, none of which was statutorily required to offer the services that formed the basis of the contract. [37] Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 26 Wis. 2d 683, 698 , 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965). [38] Id. at 698 . [39] Id. at 702 . [40] See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 2003All of the cases are distinguishable, however, They all involve post-secondary schools, none of which was statutorily required to offer the services that formed the basis of the contract. [37] Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 26 Wis. 2d 683, 698 , 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965). [38] Id. at 698 . [39] Id. at 702 . [40] See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 | 1 | 2 |
United States v. Harry Kurzergreen1 sentence2016The protection provided by the privilege against self-incrimination "is a very broad one." United States v. Kurzer, 534 F.2d 511, 516 (2d Cir. 1976). | 1 | 1 |
McKenna v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp.green1 sentence2013See, e.g., Andrews v. Chevy Chase Bank, 545 F.3d 570, 575 (7th Cir. 2008) ("'[T]he notion that Congress would limit liability to $500,000 with respect to one remedy while allowing the sky to be the limit with respect to another for the same violation strains credulity.'" (quoting McKenna v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp., 475 F.3d 418, 424 (1st Cir. 2007))). 38 No. 2007AP221.ssa relief granted in the present case might cost the District 200 times the statutory damage cap of $50,000. ¶215 As this court explained in Sambs v. City of Brookfield, 97 Wis. 2d 356 , 293 N.W.2d 504 (1980), "The legisla | 1 | 1 |
Sambs v. City of Brookfieldgreen2 sentences2013We recognize, however, that the suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute. 79 See majority op., ¶¶78-80, 83; Sambs v. City of Brookfield, 97 Wis. 2d 356, 377, 383 , 293 N.W.2d 504 (1980); Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 842 , 280 N.W.2d 711 (1979). 80 Other courts have recognized this extreme irony. 2013We recognize, however, that the suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute. 79 See majority op., ¶¶78-80, 83; Sambs v. City of Brookfield, 97 Wis. 2d 356, 377, 383 , 293 N.W.2d 504 (1980); Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 842 , 280 N.W.2d 711 (1979). 80 Other courts have recognized this extreme irony. | 1 | 1 |
Andrews v. Chevy Chase Bankgreen1 sentence2013See, e.g., Andrews v. Chevy Chase Bank, 545 F.3d 570, 575 (7th Cir. 2008) ("'[T]he notion that Congress would limit liability to $500,000 with respect to one remedy while allowing the sky to be the limit with respect to another for the same violation strains credulity.'" (quoting McKenna v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp., 475 F.3d 418, 424 (1st Cir. 2007))). 38 No. 2007AP221.ssa relief granted in the present case might cost the District 200 times the statutory damage cap of $50,000. ¶215 As this court explained in Sambs v. City of Brookfield, 97 Wis. 2d 356 , 293 N.W.2d 504 (1980), "The legisla | 1 | 1 |
Scholtes v. Signal Delivery Service, Inc.green2 sentences1991In this same context it has been said that, "malice which would remove the protection of privilege is not limited to hate, vindictiveness or animosity but may be found in reckless disregard of the right of another or such conscious indifference to results as could be regarded as willfully wrong." Scholtes v. Signal Delivery Service, Inc., 548 F. Supp. 487, 497 (W.D. 1991In this same context it has been said that, "malice which would remove the protection of privilege is not limited to hate, vindictiveness or animosity but may be found in reckless disregard of the right of another or such conscious indifference to results as could be regarded as willfully wrong." Scholtes v. Signal Delivery Service, Inc., 548 F. Supp. 487, 497 (W.D. | 1 | 1 |
Schmerber v. Californiagreen1 sentence1986Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 763-62 (1966). | 1 | 1 |
Malloy v. Hogangreen2 sentences1984In Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 11, 12 (1964), the Court said: "We recently elaborated the content of the federal standard in Hoffman: "The privilege afforded not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction . . . but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute. . . . [I] f the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard .. . he would be compelled to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee. 1984In Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 11, 12 (1964),the Court said: “We recently elaborated the content of the federal standard in Hoffman: “The privilege afforded not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction . . . but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute. . . . [I]f the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard ... he would be compelled to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee. | 1 | 1 |
DiBella v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1980The delays caused by piecemeal appeals are “inimical to the effective and fair administration of the criminal law.” DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 126 (1962). 1980The delays caused by piecemeal appeals are "inimical to the effective and fair administration of the criminal law." DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 126 (1962). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County
green
2 sentences2003See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 (1989) (statute does not grant immunity from breach of contract claims). 2003See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 (1989) (statute does not grant immunity from breach of contract claims). | 3 | 2000–2003 |
Forrer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
green
2 sentences2003All of the cases are distinguishable, however, They all involve post-secondary schools, none of which was statutorily required to offer the services that formed the basis of the contract. [37] Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 26 Wis. 2d 683, 698 , 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965). [38] Id. at 698 . [39] Id. at 702 . [40] See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 2003All of the cases are distinguishable, however, They all involve post-secondary schools, none of which was statutorily required to offer the services that formed the basis of the contract. [37] Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 26 Wis. 2d 683, 698 , 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965). [38] Id. at 698 . [39] Id. at 702 . [40] See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Muetze v. State
green
2 sentences2002Muetze, 73 Wis. 2d at 129 . 2002Muetze, 73 Wis. 2d at 129 . | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Steele v. Dunham
green
2 sentences1935This principle is stated and given force in Steele v. Dunham, 26 Wis. 393 , by the present chief justice, to shield from liability members of an equalizing board or board of review of assessments, who are charged with liability for damages to the plaintiff for corruptly and oppressively increasing the valuation of certain property without proof. 1888This principle is stated and given force in Steele v. Dunham, 26 Wis. 393 , by the present chief justice, to shield from liability members of an equalizing board or board of review of assessments, who are charged with liability for damages to the plaintiff for corruptly and oppressively increasing the valuation of certain property without proof. | 2 | 1888–1935 |
Hoffman v. United States
green
1 sentence2018At this point, requiring Attorney Curtis to trace the path of his employees' 401(k) withholdings from paycheck-to-plan might improperly compel him "to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee." Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 486 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Stanhope v. Brown County
green
2 sentences2013We recognize, however, that the suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute. 79 See majority op., ¶¶78-80, 83; Sambs v. City of Brookfield, 97 Wis. 2d 356, 377, 383 , 293 N.W.2d 504 (1980); Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 842 , 280 N.W.2d 711 (1979). 80 Other courts have recognized this extreme irony. 2013We recognize, however, that the suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute. 79 See majority op., ¶¶78-80, 83; Sambs v. City of Brookfield, 97 Wis. 2d 356, 377, 383 , 293 N.W.2d 504 (1980); Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 842 , 280 N.W.2d 711 (1979). 80 Other courts have recognized this extreme irony. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003All of the cases are distinguishable, however, They all involve post-secondary schools, none of which was statutorily required to offer the services that formed the basis of the contract. [37] Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 26 Wis. 2d 683, 698 , 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965). [38] Id. at 698 . [39] Id. at 702 . [40] See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 2003All of the cases are distinguishable, however, They all involve post-secondary schools, none of which was statutorily required to offer the services that formed the basis of the contract. [37] Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 26 Wis. 2d 683, 698 , 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965). [38] Id. at 698 . [39] Id. at 702 . [40] See Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 2000 WI 56, ¶¶ 33, 35 , 235 Wis. 2d 409 , 611 N.W.2d 693 (suits must be based in tort to garner the protection of immunity consistent with the statute); Energy Complexes, Inc. v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453, 464-65 , 449 N.W.2d 35 | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Kimps v. Hill
green
2 sentences2002Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 11-12 , 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996). 2002Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 11-12 , 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State Department of Natural Resources v. City of Waukesha
green
2 sentences2000The court said: "It is clear from the plain language, especially as bolstered by the legislative history, that the legislature intended that § 893.80(1)(b) apply to `all causes of action, not just those in tort and not just those for money damages'" (citing DNR v. City of Waukesha, 184 Wis. 2d 178, 191 , 515 N.W.2d 888 (1994)). [8] As noted in footnote 6, this court unanimously rejected breach of contract immunity in Energy Complexes v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453 , 449 N.W.2d 35 (1989). [9] The majority attempts to limit the holding in Johnson , asserting in ś 33 that "suits must be ba 2000The court said: "It is clear from the plain language, especially as bolstered by the legislative history, that the legislature intended that § 893.80(1)(b) apply to `all causes of action, not just those in tort and not just those for money damages'" (citing DNR v. City of Waukesha, 184 Wis. 2d 178, 191 , 515 N.W.2d 888 (1994)). [8] As noted in footnote 6, this court unanimously rejected breach of contract immunity in Energy Complexes v. Eau Claire County, 152 Wis. 2d 453 , 449 N.W.2d 35 (1989). [9] The majority attempts to limit the holding in Johnson , asserting in ś 33 that "suits must be ba | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Willow Creek Ranch, L. L. C. v. Town of Shelby
green
2 sentences2000Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 224 Wis. 2d 269, 286-87 , 592 N.W.2d 15 (Ct. App. 1998). 2000Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby, 224 Wis. 2d 269, 286-87 , 592 N.W.2d 15 (Ct. App. 1998). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
United States v. Dionisio
green
1 sentence1978United States v. Dionisio, supra , 11. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Hentges v. Wolff
green
2 sentences1974Therefore, both of the conditions necessary for recovery have lo66n ullc^cd Hentges v. Wolff (1953), 240 Minn. 517 , 61 N. W. 2d 748 , considered the broker’s right to a commission under a similar broker’s protection clause. 1974Therefore, both of the conditions necessary for recovery have lo66n ullc^cd Hentges v. Wolff (1953), 240 Minn. 517 , 61 N. W. 2d 748 , considered the broker’s right to a commission under a similar broker’s protection clause. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Smith v. City of Green Bay
green
2 sentences1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . 1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Strong v. City of Stevens Point
green
2 sentences1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . 1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Witkowski v. City of Menasha
green
2 sentences1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . 1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.
green
2 sentences1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . 1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Prunty v. Vandenberg
green
2 sentences1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . 1952Prunty v. Vandenberg (1950), 257 Wis. 469 , 44 N. W. (2d) 246 ; Witkowski v. Menasha (1943), 242 Wis. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 612 ; Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1942), 240 Wis. 215 , 2 N. W. (2d) 242 ; Smith v. Green Bay (1937), 223 Wis. 427 , 271 N. W. 28 ; Strong v. Stevens Point (1885), 62 Wis. 255 , 22 N. W. 425 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Dahlman v. Hammel
neutral
1 sentence1942Dahlman v. Hammel (1878), 45 Wis. 466 ; International Textbook Co. v. Mabbott (1915); 159 Wis. 423 , 150 N. W. 429 ; Holmes v. Webb (1917), 166 Wis. 280 , 164 N. W. 1007 ; 24 Am. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
International Textbook Co. v. Mabbott
green
2 sentences1942Dahlman v. Hammel (1878), 45 Wis. 466 ; International Textbook Co. v. Mabbott (1915); 159 Wis. 423 , 150 N. W. 429 ; Holmes v. Webb (1917), 166 Wis. 280 , 164 N. W. 1007 ; 24 Am. 1942Dahlman v. Hammel (1878), 45 Wis. 466 ; International Textbook Co. v. Mabbott (1915); 159 Wis. 423 , 150 N. W. 429 ; Holmes v. Webb (1917), 166 Wis. 280 , 164 N. W. 1007 ; 24 Am. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
| Holmes v. Webb neutral | 1 | 1942–1942 |
| Vannatta v. Lancaster Light & Power Co. neutral | 1 | 1940–1940 |
| Joseph v. Baars green | 1 | 1924–1924 |
| In re Will of Hunt green | 1 | 1920–1920 |
| McGinty v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen neutral | 1 | 1920–1920 |
| Raymond v. Fish green | 1 | 1904–1904 |
| Bunker v. City of Hudson green | 1 | 1904–1904 |
| Damkoehler v. City of Milwaukee green | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.