Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1883–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fisher v. Fishergreen1 sentence2019Vermont “regards the protection of children as one of [our] most important responsibilities.” Eddy v. Eddy, 2003 VT 67, ¶ 11 , 175 Vt. 608 , 833 A.2d 1243 (mem.); see also Varnum v. Varnum, 155 Vt. 376, 384 , 586 A.2d 1107, 1111 (1990) (citing Fisher v. Fisher, 324 N.W.2d 582, 584 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982) (finding it “difficult” to conceive of a more compelling state interest)) (stating that “[t]here is no question that the societal interest in protecting and nurturing children is great”). | 1 | 1 |
Varnum v. Varnumgreen2 sentences2019Vermont “regards the protection of children as one of [our] most important responsibilities.” Eddy v. Eddy, 2003 VT 67, ¶ 11 , 175 Vt. 608 , 833 A.2d 1243 (mem.); see also Varnum v. Varnum, 155 Vt. 376, 384 , 586 A.2d 1107, 1111 (1990) (citing Fisher v. Fisher, 324 N.W.2d 582, 584 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982) (finding it “difficult” to conceive of a more compelling state interest)) (stating that “[t]here is no question that the societal interest in protecting and nurturing children is great”). 2019Vermont “regards the protection of children as one of [our] most important responsibilities.” Eddy v. Eddy, 2003 VT 67, ¶ 11 , 175 Vt. 608 , 833 A.2d 1243 (mem.); see also Varnum v. Varnum, 155 Vt. 376, 384 , 586 A.2d 1107, 1111 (1990) (citing Fisher v. Fisher, 324 N.W.2d 582, 584 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982) (finding it “difficult” to conceive of a more compelling state interest)) (stating that “[t]here is no question that the societal interest in protecting and nurturing children is great”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Younggreen2 sentences2016First, under Rule 613(b), the “statements sought to be used for impeachment must first be brought to the attention of the witness and an opportunity provided for explanation or denial.” State v. Young, 139 Vt. 535, 538 , 433 A.2d 254, 256 (1981); see also 1 McCormick, supra, § 37, at 122-23 (noting this foundation requirement attempts to prevent jury from *188 treating the extrinsic statement as substantive evidence). 2016First, under Rule 613(b), the “statements sought to be used for impeachment must first be brought to the attention of the witness and an opportunity provided for explanation or denial.” State v. Young, 139 Vt. 535, 538 , 433 A.2d 254, 256 (1981); see also 1 McCormick, supra, § 37, at 122-23 (noting this foundation requirement attempts to prevent jury from *188 treating the extrinsic statement as substantive evidence). | 1 | 1 |
Howard v. Chapmangreen1 sentence1935See State v. Lapan, 101 Vt. 124, 133 , 141 Atl. 686 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lapangreen1 sentence1935See State v. Lapan, 101 Vt. 124, 133 , 141 Atl. 686 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Roundsgreen2 sentences1933Ryder v. Vermont Last Block Co., 91 Vt. 158, 167 , 99 Atl. 733 ; see State v. Rounds, 104 Vt. 442 , 160 Atl. 249, 253, 254 . 1933Ryder v. Vermont Last Block Co., 91 Vt. 158, 167 , 99 Atl. 733 ; see State v. Rounds, 104 Vt. 442 , 160 Atl. 249, 253, 254 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Kostenblatt
green
1 sentence2020The parties’ legal arguments regarding the Museum NOV are much the same as those previously addressed in our discussion of the Foundation’s motion above.16 For the reasons outlined on pages 12–14, we conclude that Condition 2 of the conditional use permit requires us to “determine the proposal presented [to the ZBA] to understand the permit requirements.”17 See Kostenblatt, 161 Vt. at 299 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Grayned v. City of Rockford
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Wood v. Eddy
green
2 sentences2019Vermont “regards the protection of children as one of [our] most important responsibilities.” Eddy v. Eddy, 2003 VT 67, ¶ 11 , 175 Vt. 608 , 833 A.2d 1243 (mem.); see also Varnum v. Varnum, 155 Vt. 376, 384 , 586 A.2d 1107, 1111 (1990) (citing Fisher v. Fisher, 324 N.W.2d 582, 584 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982) (finding it “difficult” to conceive of a more compelling state interest)) (stating that “[t]here is no question that the societal interest in protecting and nurturing children is great”). 2019Vermont “regards the protection of children as one of [our] most important responsibilities.” Eddy v. Eddy, 2003 VT 67, ¶ 11 , 175 Vt. 608 , 833 A.2d 1243 (mem.); see also Varnum v. Varnum, 155 Vt. 376, 384 , 586 A.2d 1107, 1111 (1990) (citing Fisher v. Fisher, 324 N.W.2d 582, 584 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982) (finding it “difficult” to conceive of a more compelling state interest)) (stating that “[t]here is no question that the societal interest in protecting and nurturing children is great”). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Stanhope v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
green
2 sentences1996There is no support for the proposition that the difference can eliminate the foundation requirement of Lander that the witness “aver that the statement accurately reflected his knowledge at the time of its making.” Lander, 155 Vt. at 645 , 582 A.2d at 128 . 1996There is no support for the proposition that the difference can eliminate the foundation requirement of Lander that the witness "aver that the statement accurately reflected his knowledge at the time of its making." Lander, 155 Vt. at 645 , 582 A.2d at 128 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Lander
green
2 sentences1996There is no support for the proposition that the difference can eliminate the foundation requirement of Lander that the witness “aver that the statement accurately reflected his knowledge at the time of its making.” Lander, 155 Vt. at 645 , 582 A.2d at 128 . 1996There is no support for the proposition that the difference can eliminate the foundation requirement of Lander that the witness "aver that the statement accurately reflected his knowledge at the time of its making." Lander, 155 Vt. at 645 , 582 A.2d at 128 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Howley v. Kantor
green
2 sentences1964Howley v. Kantor, 105 Vt. 128, 133 , 163 Atl. 628 . 1964Howley v. Kantor, 105 Vt. 128, 133 , 163 Atl. 628 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Ryder v. Vermont Last Block Co.
green
2 sentences1933Ryder v. Vermont Last Block Co., 91 Vt. 158, 167 , 99 Atl. 733 ; see State v. Rounds, 104 Vt. 442 , 160 Atl. 249, 253, 254 . 1933Ryder v. Vermont Last Block Co., 91 Vt. 158, 167 , 99 Atl. 733 ; see State v. Rounds, 104 Vt. 442 , 160 Atl. 249, 253, 254 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Ormsbee v. Howe
neutral
1 sentence1883Ormsbee v. Howe, supra. It is probable the plaintiff in such a case would be liable for whatever expense he should cause the defendant by *the dishonest assertion of a false claim to extort* money. | 1 | 1883–1883 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.