modern rule (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

modern rule in Georgia

8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1848–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, Inc.green
gactapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010Compare Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, 251 Ga. App. 124, 131 (2) (c) ( 553 SE2d 662 ) (2001). 17 Our conclusion is consistent with the modern rule among state courts that “the fact that a spouse performs [services required to be furnished by the employer] should not inure to the benefit of the employer.” Workers’ compensation: recovery for home services provided by spouse, 67 ALR 4th 765 , § I (2) (a) (2010).

2010Compare Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, 251 Ga. App. 124, 131 (2) (c) ( 553 SE2d 662 ) (2001). 17 Our conclusion is consistent with the modern rule among state courts that “the fact that a spouse performs [services required to be furnished by the employer] should not inure to the benefit of the employer.” Workers’ compensation: recovery for home services provided by spouse, 67 ALR 4th 765 , § I (2) (a) (2010).

11
Helen Hanna, Cicero Hanna v. Annie C. Fletcher, Trustee of Estate of Florence Johnson, Benjamin F. Fletcher, and Fred S. Gichner Iron Works, Inc.green
cadc · 1956 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009See Hanna v. Fletcher, 231 F.2d 469 (D.C.Cir.1956).

11
Cuyler v. Ensworthgreen
nychanct · 1836 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1848–1848
1 sentence

1848Ensworth, 6 Paige, 32, 33.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Bawknight v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance neutral
ga · 1875
2 sentences

1942The case of Bawknight v. Insurance Company, 55 Ga. 194 , was decided during the transition period and before the modern doctrine had been firmly established.

1905The case of Bawknight v. Insurance Company, 55 Ga. 194 , was decided during the transition period and before the modern doctrine had been firmly established.

21905–1942
Marchman & Sons, Inc. v. Nelson green
ga · 1983
1 sentence

2005Marchman, supra, 251 Ga. at 476 , citing Code 1933, § 105-2012.

12005–2005
Maxey v. Hospital Authority green
ga · 1980
2 sentences

1985Auth., 245 Ga. 480 ( 265 SE2d 779 ) (1980), with regard to the admissibility of parol evidence where the terms of the release were clear and unambiguous.

1985Auth., 245 Ga. 480 ( 265 SE2d 779 ) (1980), with regard to the admissibility of parol evidence where the terms of the release were clear and unambiguous.

11985–1985
Smith v. Farmers Mutual Insurance green
ga · 1900
1 sentence

1915Co., 111 Ga. 737 ( 36 S. E. 957 ), Cobb, J., states: “It may be safely said, in view of the foregoing, that the doctrine announced in Ingram v. Little is not, at this time, to be regarded as the law of this State.” “It seems to be the modern rule that parol authority to fill a deed is sufficient, and therefore not only may'a deed be delivered to an agent by the maker to be filled and delivered, both in the ease of specialties and conveyances of land, but also, in the former, parol authority is sufficient to fill after delivery.” 2 C.

11915–1915
Greene v. Almand green
ga · 1900
1 sentence

1915Co., 111 Ga. 737 ( 36 S. E. 957 ), Cobb, J., states: “It may be safely said, in view of the foregoing, that the doctrine announced in Ingram v. Little is not, at this time, to be regarded as the law of this State.” “It seems to be the modern rule that parol authority to fill a deed is sufficient, and therefore not only may'a deed be delivered to an agent by the maker to be filled and delivered, both in the ease of specialties and conveyances of land, but also, in the former, parol authority is sufficient to fill after delivery.” 2 C.

11915–1915

Where else courts name it

CA 141 (1885–2026) NY 88 (1806–2025) PA 79 (1855–2024) IN 60 (1874–2024) MO 59 (1892–2025) IL 53 (1868–2013) TX 48 (1913–2022) TN 41 (1875–2025) IA 41 (1871–2021) MD 40 (1964–2025) MI 40 (1879–2023) NC 39 (1893–2022) WA 38 (1901–2024) CT 36 (1917–2022) KY 36 (1857–2025) OH 33 (1894–2026) AL 32 (1876–2026) CO 31 (1896–2023) NJ 31 (1832–2025) AZ 31 (1922–2018) OK 30 (1913–2004) KS 29 (1893–2024) WV 28 (1893–2013) VA 24 (1882–2026) NM 24 (1904–2024) OR 21 (1871–2014) WI 20 (1900–2021) FL 20 (1931–2017) LA 17 (1871–2020) MS 17 (1904–1998) MA 17 (1906–2025) NE 16 (1888–1981) MN 15 (1875–2024) DC 12 (1976–2011) ND 12 (1893–1980) DE 11 (1900–2018) HI 11 (1921–2011) ME 11 (1903–2020) AR 10 (1907–2010) UT 9 (1912–2019) MT 9 (1899–1936) SC 9 (1927–2023) WY 8 (1933–2013) GA 8 (1848–2010) AK 8 (1970–2011) ID 7 (1909–1992) SD 7 (1890–2007) NH 6 (1974–2024) VT 5 (1932–2025) RI 5 (1901–1983) NV 4 (1910–1932) VI 2 (1991–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check