Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Virgin Islands opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virgin Islands courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.green2 sentences2017Co. of Puerto Rico, 56 V.I. 558, 565-66 (V.I. 2012) (citing Rosenau v. Unifund Corp., 539 F.3d 218, 221 (3d Cir. 2008)). 2012Rosenau v. Unifund Corp., 539 F.3d 218, 221 (3d Cir. 2008). | 2 | 2 |
Molloy v. Independence Blue Crossgreen1 sentence2024See Molloy v. Independence Blue Cross, 56 V.I. 155, 169 (V.I. 2012) (“We apply a de novo standard of review to a determination by the Superior Court that it lacked personal jurisdiction. . . . | 1 | 1 |
Benjamin v. AIG Insurancegreen1 sentence2017Co. of Puerto Rico, 56 V.I. 558, 565-66 (V.I. 2012) (citing Rosenau v. Unifund Corp., 539 F.3d 218, 221 (3d Cir. 2008)). | 1 | 1 |
G & S Livingston Realty, Inc. v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.green1 sentence2014See, e.g., G&S Livingston Realty, Inc. v. CVS Pharm., Inc., 506 Fed. | 1 | 1 |
Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold Pinkergreen1 sentence2012See Telcordia Tech Inc. v. Telkom SA Ltd., 458 F.3d 172, 176 (3d Cir. 2006) (citing Pinker v. Roche Holdings Ltd., 292 F.3d 361, 368 (3d Cir. 2002)). | 1 | 1 |
Telcordia Tech Inc, in the Matter of the Arbitration of Certain Controversies Between v. Telkom Sa Ltdgreen1 sentence2012See Telcordia Tech Inc. v. Telkom SA Ltd., 458 F.3d 172, 176 (3d Cir. 2006) (citing Pinker v. Roche Holdings Ltd., 292 F.3d 361, 368 (3d Cir. 2002)). | 1 | 1 |
Martinez v. Colombian Emeralds, Inc.green1 sentence2011See Martinez, 51 V.I. at 187 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virgin Islands. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Browne v. People
green
1 sentence2012(J.A. 58-59.) We recognize that in Browne , this Court stated that the trial court’s “findings” are reviewed under a de novo standard. 50 V.I. at 247 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion
green
2 sentences2010Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729, 744 , 105 S. Ct. 1598 , 84 L. 2010Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729, 744 , 105 S. Ct. 1598 , 84 L. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.