exacting rule (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

exacting rule in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1893–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Ex Parte Integon Corp.green
ala · 1995 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Moreover, a petitioner must meet the exacting standard required for mandamus relief: 11 SC-2023-0385 "Mandamus is a drastic and extraordinary writ, to be issued only where there is (1) a clear legal right in the petitioner to the order sought; (2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; (3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and (4) properly invoked jurisdiction of the court." Ex parte Integon Corp., 672 So. 2d 497, 499 (Ala. 1995).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis green
scotus · 1995
2 sentences

2014To meet this requirement, it must be shown that a maritime employee has “a connection to a vessel in navigation (or to an identifiable group of such vessels) that is substantial in terms of both its duration and nature.” 515 U.S. at 368 , 115 S.Ct. 2172 .

2014To meet this requirement, it must be shown that a maritime employee has “a connection to a vessel in navigation (or to an identifiable group of such vessels) that is substantial in terms of both its duration and nature.” 515 U.S. at 368 , 115 S.Ct. 2172 .

12014–2014
Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County, Fla. green
ca11 · 2010
1 sentence

2013In essence, Title IX’s premise ‘is an official decision by the recipient not to remedy the violation.’ Gebser, 524 U.S. at 290 , 118 S.Ct. at 1999 .” Doe, 604 F.3d at 1259 .

12013–2013
Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District green
scotus · 1998
2 sentences

2013In essence, Title IX’s premise ‘is an official decision by the recipient not to remedy the violation.’ Gebser, 524 U.S. at 290 , 118 S.Ct. at 1999 .” Doe, 604 F.3d at 1259 .

2013In essence, Title IX’s premise ‘is an official decision by the recipient not to remedy the violation.’ Gebser, 524 U.S. at 290 , 118 S.Ct. at 1999 .” Doe, 604 F.3d at 1259 .

12013–2013
Cobb v. Malone green
ala · 1890
1 sentence

1920However .if it is assumed that Bibb’s testimony left in doubt the -matter of the character of the receptacle about which he testified, so as to require the submission of this phase of the issue to the jury, the other evidence before the court was abundant to exclude and remove the possibility of any reasonable doubt in the premises, within the exacting rule of Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630, 635 . 9 South. 738 .

11920–1920
Jefford's Adm'r v. Ringgold & Co. neutral
ala · 1844
1 sentence

1893In Alabama we have not adopted the exacting rule, but have held that all contracts of infants, with a very limited exception, are simply voidable — not void. — Jef ford v. Ringgold, 6 Ala. 544 ; Thomasson v. Boyd, 13 Ala. 419 ; West v. Penny, 16 Ala. 186 ; Shropshire v. Burns, 46 Ala. 108 ; Philpot v. Bingham, 45 Ala. 435 ; Flexner v. Dickerson, 72 Ala. 318 ; Sharpe v. Robertson, 76 Ala. 343 .

11893–1893
Thomasson v. Boyd neutral
ala · 1848
1 sentence

1893In Alabama we have not adopted the exacting rule, but have held that all contracts of infants, with a very limited exception, are simply voidable — not void. — Jef ford v. Ringgold, 6 Ala. 544 ; Thomasson v. Boyd, 13 Ala. 419 ; West v. Penny, 16 Ala. 186 ; Shropshire v. Burns, 46 Ala. 108 ; Philpot v. Bingham, 45 Ala. 435 ; Flexner v. Dickerson, 72 Ala. 318 ; Sharpe v. Robertson, 76 Ala. 343 .

11893–1893
West v. Penny green
ala · 1849
1 sentence

1893In Alabama we have not adopted the exacting rule, but have held that all contracts of infants, with a very limited exception, are simply voidable — not void. — Jef ford v. Ringgold, 6 Ala. 544 ; Thomasson v. Boyd, 13 Ala. 419 ; West v. Penny, 16 Ala. 186 ; Shropshire v. Burns, 46 Ala. 108 ; Philpot v. Bingham, 45 Ala. 435 ; Flexner v. Dickerson, 72 Ala. 318 ; Sharpe v. Robertson, 76 Ala. 343 .

11893–1893
Shropshire v. Burns neutral
ala · 1871
1 sentence

1893In Alabama we have not adopted the exacting rule, but have held that all contracts of infants, with a very limited exception, are simply voidable — not void. — Jef ford v. Ringgold, 6 Ala. 544 ; Thomasson v. Boyd, 13 Ala. 419 ; West v. Penny, 16 Ala. 186 ; Shropshire v. Burns, 46 Ala. 108 ; Philpot v. Bingham, 45 Ala. 435 ; Flexner v. Dickerson, 72 Ala. 318 ; Sharpe v. Robertson, 76 Ala. 343 .

11893–1893
Flexner & Lichten v. Dickerson neutral
· 1882
1 sentence

1893In Alabama we have not adopted the exacting rule, but have held that all contracts of infants, with a very limited exception, are simply voidable — not void. — Jef ford v. Ringgold, 6 Ala. 544 ; Thomasson v. Boyd, 13 Ala. 419 ; West v. Penny, 16 Ala. 186 ; Shropshire v. Burns, 46 Ala. 108 ; Philpot v. Bingham, 45 Ala. 435 ; Flexner v. Dickerson, 72 Ala. 318 ; Sharpe v. Robertson, 76 Ala. 343 .

11893–1893
Sharp v. Robertson's Executors neutral
ala · 1884
1 sentence

1893In Alabama we have not adopted the exacting rule, but have held that all contracts of infants, with a very limited exception, are simply voidable — not void. — Jef ford v. Ringgold, 6 Ala. 544 ; Thomasson v. Boyd, 13 Ala. 419 ; West v. Penny, 16 Ala. 186 ; Shropshire v. Burns, 46 Ala. 108 ; Philpot v. Bingham, 45 Ala. 435 ; Flexner v. Dickerson, 72 Ala. 318 ; Sharpe v. Robertson, 76 Ala. 343 .

11893–1893

Where else courts name it

TX 179 (1969–2026) NJ 145 (1958–2026) IL 81 (1978–2026) CA 76 (1895–2026) NY 75 (1943–2026) CT 61 (1923–2024) PA 44 (1892–2026) DC 26 (1988–2024) MD 22 (1983–2023) MA 22 (1951–2019) MI 22 (1973–2022) NM 20 (1990–2024) FL 19 (1991–2019) NC 17 (1917–2025) WA 17 (2004–2025) DE 16 (1997–2026) RI 16 (1990–2021) KY 16 (1979–2025) AZ 15 (1996–2022) KS 12 (1938–2025) WI 12 (1975–2025) CO 12 (1988–2026) VA 11 (1998–2024) MN 11 (1972–2025) OH 10 (1984–2025) OR 9 (1954–2021) IA 9 (1970–2020) ND 8 (1986–2014) GA 8 (2000–2025) AK 7 (1976–2024) VT 6 (2005–2023) IN 6 (1973–2012) TN 6 (2003–2021) MO 5 (1885–2024) WV 5 (1988–2021) UT 5 (2002–2019) HI 5 (1964–2020) SD 5 (1978–2018) NV 5 (2015–2021) WY 5 (2019–2025) AL 5 (1893–2024) MS 4 (1966–2021) SC 4 (1962–2024) LA 4 (1989–2008) NH 4 (1970–2015) OK 4 (1946–2016) NE 3 (1966–2015) ME 3 (1984–2020) ID 3 (1977–2007) VI 2 (2013–2013) MT 2 (1999–2003) AR 2 (1974–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check