Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Haley v. Talcottgreen2 sentences2008One such instance occurred in Haley v. Talcott, 864 A2d 86, 94 (Del 2004). 2008One such instance occurred in Haley v. Talcott, 864 A.2d 86, 94 (Del.Ch.2004). | 1 | 1 |
Ellis v. City of Yanktongreen1 sentence1997Ellis v. City of Yankton, 526 N.W.2d 124, 126 (S.D.1995) (must construe words in statute that are related together; must derive the intent of the statute from reading it as a whole); Kelley v. Duling Enters., Inc., 84 S.D. 427, 433 , 172 N.W.2d 727, 730 (1969) (“In construing a particular word or term in a statute reference will be had to the meaning of the words with which it is associated.”). [¶ 12.] Until today, this Court has not addressed the scope of the disclosure statutes at issue. | 1 | 1 |
Kelley v. Duling Enterprises, Inc.green2 sentences1997Ellis v. City of Yankton, 526 N.W.2d 124, 126 (S.D.1995) (must construe words in statute that are related together; must derive the intent of the statute from reading it as a whole); Kelley v. Duling Enters., Inc., 84 S.D. 427, 433 , 172 N.W.2d 727, 730 (1969) (“In construing a particular word or term in a statute reference will be had to the meaning of the words with which it is associated.”). [¶ 12.] Until today, this Court has not addressed the scope of the disclosure statutes at issue. 1997Ellis v. City of Yankton, 526 N.W.2d 124, 126 (S.D.1995) (must construe words in statute that are related together; must derive the intent of the statute from reading it as a whole); Kelley v. Duling Enters., Inc., 84 S.D. 427, 433 , 172 N.W.2d 727, 730 (1969) (“In construing a particular word or term in a statute reference will be had to the meaning of the words with which it is associated.”). [¶ 12.] Until today, this Court has not addressed the scope of the disclosure statutes at issue. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kissnergreen2 sentences1978See also State v. Kissner, S.D., 252 N.W.2d 330 . 1978See also State v. Kissner, S.D., 252 N.W.2d 330 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Engelhart v. Kramer
green
2 sentences2018A plain reading of the terms together evince[s] a more exacting standard than truth alone.” Engelhart, 1997 S.D. 124 , ¶ 11, 570 N.W.2d at 552-53 . 2018A plain reading of the terms together evince[s] a more exacting standard than truth alone." Engelhart , 1997 S.D. 124 , ¶ 11, 570 N.W.2d at 552 -53 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Gerber
green
2 sentences1978As we held in State v. Haron, 88 S.D. 397 , 220 N.W.2d 829 , and State v. Gerber, S.D., 241 N.W.2d 720 , a less exacting test of informant reliability is applied in those cases in which the informant is an identified citizen eyewitness or victim of an offense and not a paid police informant. 1978As we held in State v. Haron, 88 S.D. 397 , 220 N.W.2d 829 , and State v. Gerber, S.D., 241 N.W.2d 720 , a less exacting test of informant reliability is applied in those cases in which the informant is an identified citizen eyewitness or victim of an offense and not a paid police informant. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Haron
green
2 sentences1978As we held in State v. Haron, 88 S.D. 397 , 220 N.W.2d 829 , and State v. Gerber, S.D., 241 N.W.2d 720 , a less exacting test of informant reliability is applied in those cases in which the informant is an identified citizen eyewitness or victim of an offense and not a paid police informant. 1978As we held in State v. Haron, 88 S.D. 397 , 220 N.W.2d 829 , and State v. Gerber, S.D., 241 N.W.2d 720 , a less exacting test of informant reliability is applied in those cases in which the informant is an identified citizen eyewitness or victim of an offense and not a paid police informant. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.