Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stellpflug v. Stellpfluggreen2 sentences2016As stated above, our court has held that “[w]hile custody is always modifiable, our courts require a more rigid standard for modification than for initial determinations in order to promote stability and continuity for the children and to discourage repeated litigation of the same issues.” Stellpflug v. Stellpflug, 70 Ark. 2016App. 88 / 14 S.W.3d 536 (2000). | 3 | 5 |
Yen My Tran Vo v. Hoa Van Vogreen2 sentences2020Vo v. Vo, 78 Ark. 2010Id. | 1 | 5 |
Wilson v. Arkansasgreen2 sentences2017However, the Wilson Court recognized that under some circumstances the “flexible requirement of reasonableness should not be read to mandate a rigid rule of announcement that ignores countervailing law enforcement interests.” Id. at 934 . 2017However, the Wilson Court recognized that under some circumstances the “flexible requirement of reasonableness should not be read to mandate a rigid rule of announcement that ignores countervailing law enforcement interests.” Id. at 934 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 . | 1 | 4 |
Jones v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2000See Jones v. Jones, 328 Ark. 97 , 940 S.W.2d 881 (1997). 2000See Jones v. Jones, 328 Ark. 97 , 940 S.W.2d 881 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
Richards v. Wisconsingreen1 sentence1998However, the “flexible rule of reasonableness should not be read to mandate a rigid rule of announcement that ignores countervailing law enforcement interests.” Richards v. Wisconsin, 117 S.Ct. 1416, 1418 (1997) (citing Wilson, supra). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Smith
neutral
2 sentences1961Smith v. Smith, 215 Ark. 839 , 233 S. W. 2d 776 . 1954Smith v. Smith, 215 Ark. 839 , 223 S. W. 2d 776 . | 2 | 1954–1961 |
Baber v. Baber
green
1 sentence2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Aguilar v. Texas
red
2 sentences1988Rigid legal rules are ill-suited to an area of such diversity. `One simple rule will not cover every situation.' In Gates the court abandoned the prior rigid rule for determining probable cause, which was established in Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), and Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964), and adopted instead a "totality of the circumstances" test. 1988Rigid legal rules are ill-suited to an area of such diversity. ‘One simple rule will not cover every situation.’ In Gates the court abandoned the prior rigid rule for determining probable cause, which was established in Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 (1969), and Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964), and adopted instead a “totality of the circumstances” test. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Spinelli v. United States
red
2 sentences1988Rigid legal rules are ill-suited to an area of such diversity. `One simple rule will not cover every situation.' In Gates the court abandoned the prior rigid rule for determining probable cause, which was established in Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), and Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964), and adopted instead a "totality of the circumstances" test. 1988Rigid legal rules are ill-suited to an area of such diversity. ‘One simple rule will not cover every situation.’ In Gates the court abandoned the prior rigid rule for determining probable cause, which was established in Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 (1969), and Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964), and adopted instead a “totality of the circumstances” test. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
International Paper Co. v. Remley
green
2 sentences1984Paper Co. v. Remley, 256 Ark. 7 , 505 S.W.2d 219 (1974), in which he said, “Of course the courts are bound by the legislature’s decision to adopt a rigid rule in the case of scheduled injuries.” Under our prior decisions the proffered evidence would not be relevant and could not change the result. 1984Paper Co. v. Remley, 256 Ark. 7 , 505 S.W.2d 219 (1974), in which he said, “Of course the courts are bound by the legislature’s decision to adopt a rigid rule in the case of scheduled injuries.” Under our prior decisions the proffered evidence would not be relevant and could not change the result. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
West v. Smith
green
2 sentences1973Similarly, the rigid requirement that extensions of time for the docketing of appeals be entered within the original 90-day period was temporarily relaxed by our opinion on rehearing in West v. Smith, 224 Ark. 651 , 278 S.W. 2d 126 (1955). 1973Similarly, the rigid requirement that extensions of time for the docketing of appeals be entered within the original 90-day period was temporarily relaxed by our opinion on rehearing in West v. Smith, 224 Ark. 651 , 278 S.W. 2d 126 (1955). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.