Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1925–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hale v. Board of Education of Calloway Countygreen2 sentences2004Our decision in Horton v. Herndon, 254 Ky. 86 , 70 S.W.2d 975, 977 (1934), fairly states the law of Kentucky and we reaffirm our reliance thereon: “With the view of securing fairness in jury trials, we have adopted a rigid rule to prevent counsel from going outside the record in their arguments to the jury. 1991Our decision in Horton v. Herndon, 254 Ky. 86 , 70 S.W.2d 975, 977 (1934), fairly states the law of Kentucky and we reaffirm our reliance thereon: “With the view of securing fairness in jury trials, we have adopted a rigid rule to prevent counsel from going outside the record in their arguments to the jury. | 2 | 2 |
Board of Education v. Greenhillgreen1 sentence1996For example, in Board of Education of Lawrence County v. Workman, Ky., 256 S.W.2d 528, 530 (1953), we recognized “that each case of this type must be decided upon the particular facts involved.” We went on to note that the formula we used “has not been followed strictly in every case, and is not intended to be applied as an exact mathematical rule.” In addition, it was not until 1976, long after the decisions relied upon in the majority opinion, that the General Assembly in KRS 160.500(1) set the sheriffs fee “equal to his expense.” Despite the fact that our holding was not intended to be appl | 1 | 1 |
Board of Education v. Workmangreen1 sentence1996For example, in Board of Education of Lawrence County v. Workman, Ky., 256 S.W.2d 528, 530 (1953), we recognized “that each case of this type must be decided upon the particular facts involved.” We went on to note that the formula we used “has not been followed strictly in every case, and is not intended to be applied as an exact mathematical rule.” In addition, it was not until 1976, long after the decisions relied upon in the majority opinion, that the General Assembly in KRS 160.500(1) set the sheriffs fee “equal to his expense.” Despite the fact that our holding was not intended to be appl | 1 | 1 |
Holland v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1 |
Truax v. Corrigangreen2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1 |
| Lucas v. Hensleygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Baird & Williams v. Pewittgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Horton v. Herndon
neutral
2 sentences2004Our decision in Horton v. Herndon, 254 Ky. 86 , 70 S.W.2d 975, 977 (1934), fairly states the law of Kentucky and we reaffirm our reliance thereon: “With the view of securing fairness in jury trials, we have adopted a rigid rule to prevent counsel from going outside the record in their arguments to the jury. 1991Our decision in Horton v. Herndon, 254 Ky. 86 , 70 S.W.2d 975, 977 (1934), fairly states the law of Kentucky and we reaffirm our reliance thereon: “With the view of securing fairness in jury trials, we have adopted a rigid rule to prevent counsel from going outside the record in their arguments to the jury. | 2 | 1991–2004 |
Comair, Inc. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Airport Corp.
green
1 sentence2020These two prongs should not be viewed as a rigid test but should instead be “treated as a guiding principle[.]” Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Wilson v. Arkansas
green
2 sentences1998The Fourth Amendment's flexible requirement of reasonableness should not be read to mandate a rigid rule of announcement that ignores countervailing law enforcement interests." Id. at 934 , 115 S.Ct. at 1918 . 1998The Fourth Amendment's flexible requirement of reasonableness should not be read to mandate a rigid rule of announcement that ignores countervailing law enforcement interests." Id. at 934 , 115 S.Ct. at 1918 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Cross v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Jackson v. Denno
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| In Re GAULT green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Duncan v. Louisiana green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Graham v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Mapp v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Gideon v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Ballew v. Georgia
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Henderson v. Morgan
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Roberts v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Taylor v. Kentucky green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Mason v. Commonwealth green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Johnson v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Crist v. Bretz
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Tate v. Short
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Chaffin v. Stynchcombe
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Herring v. New York
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Coker v. Georgia
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
McGautha v. California
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Lego v. Twomey
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Apodaca v. Oregon
red
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Gregg v. Georgia green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Furman v. Georgia
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Wardius v. Oregon green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Stone v. Powell green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Wainwright v. Sykes
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Coleman v. Alabama green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Chambers v. Mississippi green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Youman v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct 1978NOTES [1] In view of Taylor v. Kentucky, ____ U.S. ____, 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), RCr 9.56 was amended as of July 1, 1978, to require inclusion of the presumption of innocence. [2] Also in view of Taylor v. Kentucky, supra n. 1 , RCr 9.56 has been amended to caution against any attempt to define "reasonable doubt." [3] See Mason v. Commonwealth, Ky., 565 S.W.2d 140 (1978), in which future reference to the presumption of sanity was proscribed. [4] On what other facts an appellate court might rest its decision we hesitate to guess. [1] Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 344 , 42 S.Ct | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Smith v. Onyx Oil And Chemical Company green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Herbold v. Ford Motor Co. green | 1 | 1955–1955 |
| Lexington Glass Co. v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co. green | 1 | 1955–1955 |
| Hedger v. Davis green | 1 | 1949–1949 |
| Cadle v. McHargue green | 1 | 1949–1949 |
| Silver Fleet Motor Express v. Gilbert green | 1 | 1949–1949 |
| Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. green | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.