Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1951–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aid Insurance Co. v. Davis Countygreen2 sentences2016While noting “the easier course would require naming these parties,” the court did not require such a rigid rule when the released parties “are otherwise sufficiently identified in a manner that the parties to the release would know who was to be benefitted.” Id. at 633 . 1989Id. at 633 (emphasis added). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Cullisongreen1 sentence1996State v. Cullison, 227 N.W.2d 121, 127 (Iowa 1975); see also State v. Smith, 546 N.W.2d 916, 926 (Iowa 1996). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence1996State v. Cullison, 227 N.W.2d 121, 127 (Iowa 1975); see also State v. Smith, 546 N.W.2d 916, 926 (Iowa 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Tragarz v. Keene Corporationgreen1 sentence1994See Tragarz v. Keene Corp., 980 F.2d 411, 420-21 (7th Cir.1992) (application of the three prongs may vary under different circumstances). | 1 | 1 |
Truhitte v. French Hospitalgreen2 sentences1991And although some states still apply the doctrine, see, e.g., Young by and through Young v. Carpenter, 694 P.2d 861, 863 (Colo.App.1984), and California courts are split on the issue, compare Schultz by and through Schultz v. Mutch, 211 Cal.Rptr. 445 , 450 (1985) (Court of Appeal opinion endorsing doctrine; California Supreme Court denied hearing and ordered no official publication), with Truhitte v. French Hosp., 128 Cal.App.3d 332, 348-49 , 180 Cal.Rptr. 152, 160 (1982) (disapproving doctrine), the majority of courts shun this rigid doctrine of vicarious liability. 1991And although some states still apply the doctrine, see, e.g., Young by and through Young v. Carpenter, 694 P.2d 861, 863 (Colo.App.1984), and California courts are split on the issue, compare Schultz by and through Schultz v. Mutch, 211 Cal.Rptr. 445 , 450 (1985) (Court of Appeal opinion endorsing doctrine; California Supreme Court denied hearing and ordered no official publication), with Truhitte v. French Hosp., 128 Cal.App.3d 332, 348-49 , 180 Cal.Rptr. 152, 160 (1982) (disapproving doctrine), the majority of courts shun this rigid doctrine of vicarious liability. | 1 | 1 |
Young by and Through Young v. Carpentergreen1 sentence1991And although some states still apply the doctrine, see, e.g., Young by and through Young v. Carpenter, 694 P.2d 861, 863 (Colo.App.1984), and California courts are split on the issue, compare Schultz by and through Schultz v. Mutch, 211 Cal.Rptr. 445 , 450 (1985) (Court of Appeal opinion endorsing doctrine; California Supreme Court denied hearing and ordered no official publication), with Truhitte v. French Hosp., 128 Cal.App.3d 332, 348-49 , 180 Cal.Rptr. 152, 160 (1982) (disapproving doctrine), the majority of courts shun this rigid doctrine of vicarious liability. | 1 | 1 |
Sparger v. Worley Hospital, Inc.green1 sentence1991See Sparger v. Worley Hosp., Inc., 547 S.W.2d 582, 584 (Tex.1977) (rejecting captain of ship concept in favor of borrowed servant doctrine); Parker v. Vanderbilt Univ., 767 S.W.2d 412, 415 (Tenn.App.1988) (same). | 1 | 1 |
Parker v. Vanderbilt Universitygreen1 sentence1991See Sparger v. Worley Hosp., Inc., 547 S.W.2d 582, 584 (Tex.1977) (rejecting captain of ship concept in favor of borrowed servant doctrine); Parker v. Vanderbilt Univ., 767 S.W.2d 412, 415 (Tenn.App.1988) (same). | 1 | 1 |
National Labor Relations Board v. Phelpsgreen1 sentence1988See Jarrott, 225 F.Supp. at 833 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Phelps, 136 F.2d 562, 563 (5th Cir.1943). | 1 | 1 |
Jarrott v. Scrivenergreen1 sentence1988See Jarrott, 225 F.Supp. at 833 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Phelps, 136 F.2d 562, 563 (5th Cir.1943). | 1 | 1 |
Travis v. Travisgreen2 sentences1981See Travis v. Travis, 227 Ga. 406, 409 , 181 S.E.2d 61, 63 (1971) (remarriage of divorced spouses operates, at most, to relieve husband of further obligation to make installment payments of alimony, but does not affect accrued payments, which remain sole property of judgment holder); Scheibel v. Scheibel, 204 Neb. 653, 654 , 284 N.W.2d 572, 573 (1979) (remarriage of parties will not operate as matter of law to prohibit holder of support order from instituting action to collect arrearage). 1981See Travis v. Travis, 227 Ga. 406, 409 , 181 S.E.2d 61, 63 (1971) (remarriage of divorced spouses operates, at most, to relieve husband of further obligation to make installment payments of alimony, but does not affect accrued payments, which remain sole property of judgment holder); Scheibel v. Scheibel, 204 Neb. 653, 654 , 284 N.W.2d 572, 573 (1979) (remarriage of parties will not operate as matter of law to prohibit holder of support order from instituting action to collect arrearage). | 1 | 1 |
Scheibel v. Scheibelgreen2 sentences1981See Travis v. Travis, 227 Ga. 406, 409 , 181 S.E.2d 61, 63 (1971) (remarriage of divorced spouses operates, at most, to relieve husband of further obligation to make installment payments of alimony, but does not affect accrued payments, which remain sole property of judgment holder); Scheibel v. Scheibel, 204 Neb. 653, 654 , 284 N.W.2d 572, 573 (1979) (remarriage of parties will not operate as matter of law to prohibit holder of support order from instituting action to collect arrearage). 1981See Travis v. Travis, 227 Ga. 406, 409 , 181 S.E.2d 61, 63 (1971) (remarriage of divorced spouses operates, at most, to relieve husband of further obligation to make installment payments of alimony, but does not affect accrued payments, which remain sole property of judgment holder); Scheibel v. Scheibel, 204 Neb. 653, 654 , 284 N.W.2d 572, 573 (1979) (remarriage of parties will not operate as matter of law to prohibit holder of support order from instituting action to collect arrearage). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
green
1 sentence1997Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Hamilton v. Wosepka
green
2 sentences1983Rejecting the rigid rule as “amounting] to judicial prejudgment of a situation which may be entirely different than that presupposed by it,” id. at 157 , we examined the intent of the court entering the dissolution decree, in light of extrinsic evidence received under the doctrine of Hamilton v. Wosepka, 261 Iowa 299 , 154 N.W.2d 164 (1967). 1983Rejecting the rigid rule as “amounting] to judicial prejudgment of a situation which may be entirely different than that presupposed by it,” id. at 157 , we examined the intent of the court entering the dissolution decree, in light of extrinsic evidence received under the doctrine of Hamilton v. Wosepka, 261 Iowa 299 , 154 N.W.2d 164 (1967). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Peters v. Peters
green
1 sentence1983Rejecting the rigid rule as “amounting] to judicial prejudgment of a situation which may be entirely different than that presupposed by it,” id. at 157 , we examined the intent of the court entering the dissolution decree, in light of extrinsic evidence received under the doctrine of Hamilton v. Wosepka, 261 Iowa 299 , 154 N.W.2d 164 (1967). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Illinois Commerce Commission
green
2 sentences1968So also the case of Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Illinois Commerce Commission, 1 Ill.2d 509 , 116 N.E.2d 394 holds contra to our conclusion here. 1968So also the case of Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Illinois Commerce Commission, 1 Ill.2d 509 , 116 N.E.2d 394 holds contra to our conclusion here. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Livingston v. McDonald
green
1 sentence1951The rigid rule was adopted in our early case, of Livingston v. McDonald, 21 Iowa 160 , that “the owner of the higher land has no right, even in the course of the use and improvement of his farm, to collect the surface water upon his own lands into a drain or ditch, increased in quantity or in a manner different from the natural flow, upon the lower lands of another, to the injury of such [lower] lands.” (Quotation from headnote.) But this rule has been modified in the interest of agriculture to permit the upper proprietor to drain his land into a natural watercourse without liability to a lowe | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Martin v. Schwertley
neutral
2 sentences1951Martin v. Schwertley, 155 Iowa 347, 351 , 136 N.W. 218 , 40 L. 1951Martin v. Schwertley, 155 Iowa 347, 351 , 136 N.W. 218 , 40 L. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.