18 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1913–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. Board of Reviewgreen1 sentence2026But because the court of appeals concluded that the tanks in McDermott Propane were equipment instead of improvements, they were only real property 27 under paragraph (d) if they were “attached to the buildings, structures, or improvements defined in paragraph ‘c.’ ” McDermott Propane, 2022 WL 468702 , at *4 (quoting Iowa Code § 427A.1(1)(d) (2020)); accord Rose Acre Farms, Inc., 479 N.W.2d at 263 (“[If] items are not attached for purposes of section 427A.1(1)(d),” they “would not be taxed as real property because ‘attachment’ is a necessary factor for taxability of equipment and machinery und | 1 | 1 |
Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of Iowagreen2 sentences2025See 909 N.W.2d at 797 (noting that to succeed 7 on a freestanding actual-innocence claim, “the applicant must show by clear and convincing evidence that, despite the evidence of guilt supporting the conviction, no reasonable fact finder could convict the applicant of the crimes for which the sentencing court found the applicant guilty in light of all the evidence, including the newly discovered evidence.”). 2025See 909 N.W.2d at 797 (noting that to succeed 7 on a freestanding actual-innocence claim, “the applicant must show by clear and convincing evidence that, despite the evidence of guilt supporting the conviction, no reasonable fact finder could convict the applicant of the crimes for which the sentencing court found the applicant guilty in light of all the evidence, including the newly discovered evidence.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sailergreen1 sentence2023Ultimately, we take the juvenile court’s statement that it considered all of the necessary factors “at face value.” State v. Damme, 944 N.W.2d 98 , 107 (Iowa 2020) (quoting State v. Sailer, 587 N.W.2d 756, 763 (Iowa 1998)). | 1 | 1 |
Morris v. Slappygreen1 sentence2023The Sixth Amendment provides criminal defendants the right to counsel, but “[t]he Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not guarantee a ‘meaningful 5 relationship between an accused and his counsel.’” Lopez, 633 N.W.2d at 778 (quoting Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1, 14 (1983)). | 1 | 1 |
In re the Marriage of Mooregreen1 sentence2022See id. § 598.21F(2)(a); Larsen, 912 N.W.2d at 449 (“First the court must ascertain ‘the cost of postsecondary education based upon the cost of attending an in-state public institution for a course of instruction leading to an undergraduate degree and shall include the reasonable costs for only necessary postsecondary education expenses.’” (quoting Iowa Code § 598 .21F(2)(a))). | 1 | 1 |
Oregon v. Bradshawgreen1 sentence2022See Bradshaw, 462 U.S. at 1046 (noting that the defendant’s inquiry into what was going to happen to him expressed “a desire for a generalized discussion about the investigation; it was not merely a necessary inquiry arising out of the incidents of the custodial relationship”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kirchoffgreen1 sentence2016See State v. Kirchoff, 452 N.W.2d 801 , 805–06 (Iowa 1990) (“[The defendant] will not be allowed to plead anew merely because he was informed of the matters listed in rule [2.8(2)(b)] in writing instead of orally.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Merongreen1 sentence2016In State v. Meron, 675 N.W.2d 537, 542 (Iowa 2004), our supreme court indicated that the trial court has a duty to ensure the plea is knowingly and voluntarily made and in order to do so, the court “is required to make specific inquiry into a number of matters set for in the [rule 2.8(2)(b)].” A court may make the necessary inquiry either through an oral colloquy or through a written plea. | 1 | 1 |
Fischer v. Heckermangreen1 sentence2013For instance, one appellate court has stated the evidence must be “of sufficient character, substance, and weight to furnish a firm foundation for a jury’s verdict.” Fischer v. Heckerman, 772 S.W.2d 642, 646 (Ky.Ct.App.1989). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Everettgreen1 sentence1997State v. Everett, 372 N.W.2d 235, 236 (Iowa 1985). | 1 | 1 |
Alvey v. Hartwiggreen2 sentences1978See Alvey v. Hartwig, 106 Md. 254 , 67 A. 132 (1907). 1978See Alvey v. Hartwig, 106 Md. 254 , 67 A. 132 (1907). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lyle
green
2 sentences2018Id. at 400 . 11 Additionally, we established the following necessary factors for a district court to consider in deciding whether a juvenile offender warrants the minimum period of incarceration without parole: (1) the age of the offender and the features of youthful behavior, such as “immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate risks and consequences”; (2) the particular “family and home environment” that surround the youth; (3) the circumstances of the particular crime and all circumstances relating to youth that may have played a role in the commission of the crime; (4) the challenge 2018Id. at 400 . 11 Additionally, we established the following necessary factors for a district court to consider in deciding whether a juvenile offender warrants the minimum period of incarceration without parole: (1) the age of the offender and the features of youthful behavior, such as “immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate risks and consequences”; (2) the particular “family and home environment” that surround the youth; (3) the circumstances of the particular crime and all circumstances relating to youth that may have played a role in the commission of the crime; (4) the challenge | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Miller v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2018Id. at 404 n.10 (quoting Miller , 567 U.S. at 477 , 132 S.Ct. at 2468 ). 2018Id. at 404 n.10 (quoting Miller , 567 U.S. at 477 , 132 S.Ct. at 2468 ). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Lopez
green
1 sentence2023The Sixth Amendment provides criminal defendants the right to counsel, but “[t]he Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not guarantee a ‘meaningful 5 relationship between an accused and his counsel.’” Lopez, 633 N.W.2d at 778 (quoting Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1, 14 (1983)). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Hyatt
green
2 sentences2018Id. at 138 (quoting People v. Hyatt , 316 Mich.App. 368 , 891 N.W.2d 549 , 578 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016) ). 2018Id. at 138 (quoting People v. Hyatt , 316 Mich.App. 368 , 891 N.W.2d 549 , 578 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016) ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State of Iowa v. Christopher Ryan Lee Roby
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 138 (quoting People v. Hyatt , 316 Mich.App. 368 , 891 N.W.2d 549 , 578 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016) ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Roth
green
2 sentences2018The standard for sexual harassment established under the rules does not include the necessary analysis of the accused’s intent that is required in the removal context to determine whether the accused acted “intentionally, deliberately, with a bad or evil purpose, contrary to a known duty.” Roth, 162 Iowa at 651 , 144 N.W. at 344. 2018The standard for sexual harassment established under the rules does not include the necessary analysis of the accused's intent that is required in the removal context to determine whether the accused acted "intentionally, deliberately, with a bad or evil purpose, contrary to a known duty." Roth , 162 Iowa at 651 , 144 N.W. at 344 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Melvin Burns v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. Knoxville Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Inc.
green
1 sentence2003Nor are employers required to “displace existing employees from their positions.” Burns, 222 F.3d at 257 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Schlitzer v. University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
green
1 sentence2003Yet, this evidence falls below the necessary standard of proof. 5 “An employer is not required to create a vacancy.” Id. at 530 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
In Re Estate of Kirschstein
neutral
2 sentences1955A., N.S., 303: “It is not questioned by the respondents that money paid for funeral expenses by one not acting officiously, if reasonable, considering the estate of the deceased and the circumstances surrounding the death and burial, will be repaid by the estate to the party paying them. * ^ * This is-a proper, and, indeed, a necessary rule in view of the fact that the burial must often be provided for before an executor or- administrator can be appointed.” To much the same effect are In re Jack’s Estate, 275 Pa. 405 , 119 A. 474 , In re Kirschstein’s Estate, 213 Minn. 1 , 4 N.W.2d 633 , and I 1955A., N.S., 303: “It is not questioned by the respondents that money paid for funeral expenses by one not acting officiously, if reasonable, considering the estate of the deceased and the circumstances surrounding the death and burial, will be repaid by the estate to the party paying them. * ^ * This is-a proper, and, indeed, a necessary rule in view of the fact that the burial must often be provided for before an executor or- administrator can be appointed.” To much the same effect are In re Jack’s Estate, 275 Pa. 405 , 119 A. 474 , In re Kirschstein’s Estate, 213 Minn. 1 , 4 N.W.2d 633 , and I | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Jack's Estate
green
2 sentences1955A., N.S., 303: “It is not questioned by the respondents that money paid for funeral expenses by one not acting officiously, if reasonable, considering the estate of the deceased and the circumstances surrounding the death and burial, will be repaid by the estate to the party paying them. * ^ * This is-a proper, and, indeed, a necessary rule in view of the fact that the burial must often be provided for before an executor or- administrator can be appointed.” To much the same effect are In re Jack’s Estate, 275 Pa. 405 , 119 A. 474 , In re Kirschstein’s Estate, 213 Minn. 1 , 4 N.W.2d 633 , and I 1955A., N.S., 303: “It is not questioned by the respondents that money paid for funeral expenses by one not acting officiously, if reasonable, considering the estate of the deceased and the circumstances surrounding the death and burial, will be repaid by the estate to the party paying them. * ^ * This is-a proper, and, indeed, a necessary rule in view of the fact that the burial must often be provided for before an executor or- administrator can be appointed.” To much the same effect are In re Jack’s Estate, 275 Pa. 405 , 119 A. 474 , In re Kirschstein’s Estate, 213 Minn. 1 , 4 N.W.2d 633 , and I | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In re Dorsey
neutral
1 sentence1955A., N.S., 303: “It is not questioned by the respondents that money paid for funeral expenses by one not acting officiously, if reasonable, considering the estate of the deceased and the circumstances surrounding the death and burial, will be repaid by the estate to the party paying them. * ^ * This is-a proper, and, indeed, a necessary rule in view of the fact that the burial must often be provided for before an executor or- administrator can be appointed.” To much the same effect are In re Jack’s Estate, 275 Pa. 405 , 119 A. 474 , In re Kirschstein’s Estate, 213 Minn. 1 , 4 N.W.2d 633 , and I | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Murphy ex rel. Schnoor v. Murphy
green
1 sentence1913We quote the following from the recent case of Murphy v. Murphy, 146 Iowa 255 : “The value of such evidence depends largely on the identification and number of similar characteristics or lack thereof between the disputed writing and the standards. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Wesco Supply Co. v. Incorporated Town of Allerton
neutral
1 sentence1913In support of this claim, among the eases cited by appellant is that of Wesco Supply Company v. Allerton, decided by this court, and reported in 156 Iowa, 695 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.